20201116 trans - Revision history

Root: /* Yao Cheng 姚诚 */

2021-05-10T18:41:21Z

Yao Cheng 姚诚

Root: /* Yao Cheng 姚诚 */

2021-05-10T18:37:08Z

Yao Cheng 姚诚

Zhangqi: /* Zhang Xueyi 张雪仪 */

2020-12-20T05:20:10Z

Zhang Xueyi 张雪仪

Yang Ziling: /* Yang Hui 阳慧 */

2020-12-16T15:18:35Z

Yang Hui 阳慧

Yang Ziling: /* Yang Ziling 杨子泠 */

2020-12-16T15:14:46Z

Yang Ziling 杨子泠

Zhu Xu: /* Volunteer */

2020-12-10T09:39:56Z

Volunteer

Mashuya: /* Mo Nan 莫南 */

2020-11-23T13:59:14Z

Mo Nan 莫南

Mashuya: /* Ma Shuya 马淑雅 */

2020-11-23T13:55:53Z

Ma Shuya 马淑雅

XieFan: /* Xie Ziyi 谢子熠 */

2020-11-23T07:49:45Z

Xie Ziyi 谢子熠

QiKai: /* Wei Yafei 魏亚菲 */

2020-11-16T12:40:42Z

Wei Yafei 魏亚菲

@@ Line 1,301: / Line 1,301: @@
 ==Yao Cheng 姚诚==
-'''History of the Chinese Essay'''
+'''History of Chinese Studies - Introduction'''
 When we define an academic category like "Chinese studies", we pay respect to the fact that the world historically has developed differently in different regions. Of course the world was far less connected than today, with slow carriers like horses and ships and often bad or risky infrastructure  like roads.
-'''中国散文史'''
+'''汉学史——前言'''
 在定义诸如“中国研究”之类的学术类别时，我们要尊重这一事实：从历史上看，全球不同地区发展轨迹不同。当然，那是马匹和船只等运输工具速度慢，马路等基础设施经常是破烂不堪或有造成事故的风险，当时世界的联系远比现在低。--[[User:Yao Cheng|Yao Cheng]] ([[User talk:Yao Cheng|talk]]) 14:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 1,301: / Line 1,301: @@
 ==Yao Cheng 姚诚==
 When we define an academic category like "Chinese studies", we pay respect to the fact that the world historically has developed differently in different regions. Of course the world was far less connected than today, with slow carriers like horses and ships and often bad or risky infrastructure  like roads.
 在定义诸如“中国研究”之类的学术类别时，我们要尊重这一事实：从历史上看，全球不同地区发展轨迹不同。当然，那是马匹和船只等运输工具速度慢，马路等基础设施经常是破烂不堪或有造成事故的风险，当时世界的联系远比现在低。--[[User:Yao Cheng|Yao Cheng]] ([[User talk:Yao Cheng|talk]]) 14:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:20, 20 December 2020
Line 1,446:		Line 1,446:

	重读当代西方期刊上对中国文学的评论后，感到惊讶的是，即使是文人也会如此不尊重地对待中国文学，即使是在还没有翻译的时代，以至于只能说，民族中心主义的态度压倒了知识。--[[User:Blank\|Blank]] ([[User talk:Blank\|talk]]) 03:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)		重读当代西方期刊上对中国文学的评论后，感到惊讶的是，即使是文人也会如此不尊重地对待中国文学，即使是在还没有翻译的时代，以至于只能说，民族中心主义的态度压倒了知识。--[[User:Blank\|Blank]] ([[User talk:Blank\|talk]]) 03:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	对当代西方期刊关于中国文学的评论重读，吃惊的是，即使是在还没有译文的时期，就连文学家都对中国文学充满了不尊重，可以说民族优越感压倒了知识。--[[User:Zhangqi\|Zhangqi]] ([[User talk:Zhangqi\|talk]]) 05:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

	==Zhang Yinliu 张银柳==		==Zhang Yinliu 张银柳==

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:18, 16 December 2020
Line 1,281:		Line 1,281:

	But the results are often different from those of the heroes.The first emperor wanted the emperor to pass on to the world, but the second died, pardoning the books of agriculture and medicine, and the former books of the Qin Dynasty had no one left--[[User:YangHui\|YangHui]] ([[User talk:YangHui\|talk]]) 05:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)		But the results are often different from those of the heroes.The first emperor wanted the emperor to pass on to the world, but the second died, pardoning the books of agriculture and medicine, and the former books of the Qin Dynasty had no one left--[[User:YangHui\|YangHui]] ([[User talk:YangHui\|talk]]) 05:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	But the results are often different from the calculations of the heroes. The first emperor wanted the emperor to be passed on to all generations, but the second died, pardoning agricultural books and medical books, but now there is none of those books before Qin Dynasty left. --[[User:Yang Ziling\|Yang Ziling]] ([[User talk:Yang Ziling\|talk]]) 15:18, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

	==Yang Yi 杨逸==		==Yang Yi 杨逸==

@@ Line 1,294: / Line 1,294: @@
 ==Yang Ziling 杨子泠==
 这真是一个大讽刺。刺的是谁，不问也罢，但可见讽刺也还不是“梦呓”，质之黄脸干儿们，不知以为何如？六月二十八日。
 What an irony it is! Don't bother who it hurts, but it is still not a dream. When asked, ordinary people generally don't know what to do.
------- June 28th
+------ June 28th --[[User:Yang Ziling|Yang Ziling]] ([[User talk:Yang Ziling|talk]]) 15:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 ==Yao Cheng 姚诚==

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 10 December 2020
Line 1,576:		Line 1,576:

	然而，我们不应高估欧洲的贡献。现在仍然有民族中心主义的例子，甚至是出于宗教动机对中国文学作品的解读。在波恩出版的10卷《中国文学史》就是其中之一。德国汉学家在《中国文学起源论》和《中国诗歌论》两卷中，曾任神父的汉学家对中国文学的起源进行了界定:中国文学的起源在于作者与上帝的对话。--[[User:Zheng Huajun\|Zheng Huajun]] ([[User talk:Zheng Huajun\|talk]]) 05:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)		然而，我们不应高估欧洲的贡献。现在仍然有民族中心主义的例子，甚至是出于宗教动机对中国文学作品的解读。在波恩出版的10卷《中国文学史》就是其中之一。德国汉学家在《中国文学起源论》和《中国诗歌论》两卷中，曾任神父的汉学家对中国文学的起源进行了界定:中国文学的起源在于作者与上帝的对话。--[[User:Zheng Huajun\|Zheng Huajun]] ([[User talk:Zheng Huajun\|talk]]) 05:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	然而，我们不应高估欧洲的贡献。现在仍有种族中心主义的例子，甚至出于宗教动机解读中国文学。其中一个例子就是波恩出版的10卷《中国文学史》，作者波恩是曾任神父的德国汉学家。他在《中国文学起源》和《中国诗歌》两卷中明确指出，中国文学起源于作者与上帝的对话。--[[User:Zhu Xu\|Zhu Xu]] ([[User talk:Zhu Xu\|talk]]) 09:39, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

	==Volunteer==		==Volunteer==

@@ Line 738: / Line 738: @@
 Hu Deping opened the first panel on studies on the author (Caoxue) with a discussion of the banner identity of Cao Xueqin, he stressed the imperial proximity of his even plain white banner and his high social status. Hu sees descriptions of Cao asking to put drinks on his tab as a proof of his trustworthiness due to his steady imperial stipend. Fan Zhibin in his contribution interpreted Cao’s status lower. Hu Deping expressed his skepticism towards the authenticity of any findings of cultural relicts after the 1970s attributed to Cao. But he pointed at the fact, that two places in the Old Summer Palace are called like the Daguan yuan itself (‘Daguan’) or like a place in it.
 胡德平组织了曹学研究的第一次研讨会，会上讨论了曹雪芹的正白旗身份。他强调了正白旗与皇室关系之亲密，社会地位之显赫。胡认为，关于曹雪芹赊账喝酒的描述证明了他为人可靠，因为他有稳定的皇室津贴。范志斌在其作品中说明曹雪芹地位低下。胡德平对20世纪70年代以来曹雪芹文化遗物的真实性表示怀疑，但他指出了一个事实：圆明园中有两处像是大观园，或大观园一角。--[[User:Monan|Monan]] ([[User talk:Monan|talk]]) 12:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 ==Nie Xiaolou 聂晓楼==

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 23 November 2020
Line 695:		Line 695:

	[Please refer to the full bibliographic references in the footnotes for now.]		[Please refer to the full bibliographic references in the footnotes for now.]
		+
		+	王国维自1885年以来就改善了这部小说的地位，他将其视为中国文学中最重要的作品之一，并讨论了胡适和于平波。
		+	在文化大革命期间，《红楼梦》再次被禁。
		+	在德国传播
		+	1932年至1977年间出版的总册数为89335卷，《金瓶梅》在1930年至1977年间达到了175000卷。
		+	Der Traum der Roten Kammer rangiert auf Platz 4 der Welt-Bestsellerliste。
		+	参考文献
		+	[现在请参阅脚注中的完整书目参考。]--[[User:Mashuya\|Mashuya]] ([[User talk:Mashuya\|talk]]) 13:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)MaShuya

	==Ma Zhixing 马智星==		==Ma Zhixing 马智星==

@@ Line 1,184: / Line 1,184: @@
 鲁迅对西方文化的接受并不是没有批判的;他受到了传统教育和西方教育的双重影响，把普世价值观应用到中国的发展中——一个具有普世价值观的中国人——一个真正的世界公民。--[[User:XiaoXi|XiaoXi]] ([[User talk:XiaoXi|talk]]) 11:03, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Xiao Xi
 鲁迅并非不加批判完全接受西方文化；用普世价值来判断中国的发展--[[User:Li Yongshan|Li Yongshan]] ([[User talk:Li Yongshan|talk]]) 17:22, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 ==Xu Jia 徐佳==

@@ Line 1,041: / Line 1,041: @@
 --[[User:Weiyafei|Weiyafei]] ([[User talk:Weiyafei|talk]]) 03:12, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Weiyafei
-中国民权联盟理事会向贝伦副总领事馆递交了抗议说明，其中包括孙中山遗孀宋庆龄，学术界的领袖西尼卡，蔡元培，鲁迅和中央研究院副院长杨兴佛（阳泉）。 赵延年（生于1924年）在1956年制作了这些木刻版画。根据领事馆的报告，作家林语堂、艾格尼丝·史沫特莱和哈罗德——以撒并未陈列其中。 中国媒体也并未提及林语堂。--[[User:Wensixing|Wensixing]] ([[User talk:Wensixing|talk]]) 10:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
+中国民权联盟理事会向贝伦副总领事馆递交了抗议说明，其中包括孙中山的遗孀宋庆龄，学术界的领袖西尼卡，蔡元培，鲁迅和中央研究院副院长杨兴佛（阳泉）。 赵延年（生于1924）在1956年制作了这些木刻版画。根据领事馆的报告，作家林语堂、艾格尼丝·史沫特莱和哈罗德——以撒并未陈列其中。 中国媒体也并未提及林语堂。--[[User:Wensixing|Wensixing]] ([[User talk:Wensixing|talk]]) 10:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 ==Wen Sixing 文偲荇==