20201228 trans - Revision history

Li Yu: /* Lin Min 林敏 */

2021-01-03T06:04:07Z

Lin Min 林敏

Li Yu: /* Li Yu 李玉 */

2021-01-03T05:56:55Z

Li Yu 李玉

He Changqi: /* He Changqi 何长琦 */

2021-01-03T03:24:16Z

He Changqi 何长琦

Xu Mengdie: /* Xu Mengdie 徐梦蝶 */

2020-12-31T00:29:39Z

Xu Mengdie 徐梦蝶

Wen Xiaoyi: /* Wen Xiaoyi 文晓艺 */

2020-12-29T15:24:32Z

Wen Xiaoyi 文晓艺

Gudongfang: /* Gu Dongfang 顾东方 */

2020-12-28T11:49:45Z

Gu Dongfang 顾东方

Yi Huan: /* Yu Ni 余妮 */

2020-12-28T11:04:34Z

Yu Ni 余妮

Yi Huan: /* Yi Huan 易欢 */

2020-12-28T10:47:01Z

Yi Huan 易欢

Lin Min: /* Lin Min 林敏 */

2020-12-28T10:19:20Z

Lin Min 林敏

WuQiong: /* Wu Xiang 邬香 */

2020-12-28T09:48:09Z

Wu Xiang 邬香

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:04, 3 January 2021
Line 446:		Line 446:

	当时，五四小组在很多人中只有一个声音，因为它在公共领域的煽动性和争论性而获得成功，因此我们必须使用新的手段来将中文散文安排到适当的位置。从简化的叙述中，我们学到，区分和重建复杂的时间背景是绝对有必要的。对中国文学的理解仅取决于小说和诗歌的发展，而更广泛的理解将改变中国文学的整体面貌。学术上的努力是在这种类型的方法中使用现代文学理论。--[[User:Lin Min\|Lin Min]] ([[User talk:Lin Min\|talk]]) 10:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)		当时，五四小组在很多人中只有一个声音，因为它在公共领域的煽动性和争论性而获得成功，因此我们必须使用新的手段来将中文散文安排到适当的位置。从简化的叙述中，我们学到，区分和重建复杂的时间背景是绝对有必要的。对中国文学的理解仅取决于小说和诗歌的发展，而更广泛的理解将改变中国文学的整体面貌。学术上的努力是在这种类型的方法中使用现代文学理论。--[[User:Lin Min\|Lin Min]] ([[User talk:Lin Min\|talk]]) 10:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	当时，五四群体只是许多发声群体中的一个，且仅仅因为它在公共领域的煽动性和争论性而获得成功，因此我们必须使用新的方法来恰当地评估中国散文的地位。从简化的叙述中，我们学到，区分和重建复杂的时间背景是绝对有必要的。目前对中国文学的理解是其仅取决于小说和诗歌的发展，而更广泛的理解将改变中国文学的整体面貌。学术上的努力是在靠近这种文学类型的过程中使用现代文学理论。--[[User:Li Yu\|Li Yu]] ([[User talk:Li Yu\|talk]]) 06:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

	==Lin Xin 林鑫==		==Lin Xin 林鑫==

@@ Line 434: / Line 434: @@
 I will give a few hints, what the essay can contribute to the picture of Chinese Literature, which so far is overshadowed by fiction through the narrative of C.T. Hsia, Prusek and Anderson.
 We are used to established narratives, like the emergence and success of the May-Fourth literature. But this view neglects the role, that for example the ''yuanyang hudie pai'' played in the choir of different voices in the awoken intellectual debate in the beginning of this century.
 ==Lin Min 林敏==
 The May-Fourth group at that time was one voice among many and only succeeded because of its agitation and polemic in the public sphere, so we have to use new means to assign the Chinese essay its proper place. We learn from simplifiying narratives, that it is absolutely necessary to differentiate, and to reconstruct the complex time background. Having understood Chinese literature as determined by the development of fiction and poetry only, a broader understanding will change the whole appearance of Chinese literature. A scholarly endeavour is the use of modern literary theories in the approach to this genre.

@@ Line 231: / Line 231: @@
 Similar to international literature, the basic subdivision of literature in China in general is one in three types: epic (with xiaoshuo (fiction), sanwen (non-fictional prose)), lyrics (shige) and drama (xiqu).  Though there is no pure epic form, fiction and prose are often jointly addressed with the Chinese term "wu yunwen" which corresponds to the term "epic" in the West. The types may be distinguished roughly by their nature in the following way: In the epic, bygone events are retold, a broad, filled story dominates the foreground.
 ==Hu Baihui 胡百辉==
 In the lyrics, the reader is encouraged to feel the current sensations and often confessionlike feelings of the poet.  The drama recalls a self-contained action directly in monologue or dialogue and in this way unburdens the re-creative imagination of the readers/spectators through it.  The essay as a genre of the epic is a detached non-fictional subjective representation in a free form.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:29, 31 December 2020
Line 1,134:		Line 1,134:

	封建社会和奴隶		封建社会和奴隶
		+
	一种普遍的解释是，贾宝玉对家庭成员和奴隶一视同仁，这将成为奴隶解放的宣言。我并不同意这个解释，因为亚里士多德的民主就排除了奴隶的投票权。所以，我们并不能用现代观念去评判过去。在我看来，贾宝玉并不是和不平等作斗争，而是把人视作群体和个人。--[[User:Xu Mengdie\|Xu Mengdie]] ([[User talk:Xu Mengdie\|talk]]) 09:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Xu Mengdie		一种普遍的解释是，贾宝玉对家庭成员和奴隶一视同仁，这将成为奴隶解放的宣言。我并不同意这个解释，因为亚里士多德的民主就排除了奴隶的投票权。所以，我们并不能用现代观念去评判过去。在我看来，贾宝玉并不是和不平等作斗争，而是把人视作群体和个人。--[[User:Xu Mengdie\|Xu Mengdie]] ([[User talk:Xu Mengdie\|talk]]) 09:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Xu Mengdie

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:24, 29 December 2020
Line 956:		Line 956:

	However, when we look closer at these “Chinese Ethics”, we discover, that they are claimed also in Indian Buddhism “karuna” and in the Christian tradition of “caritas” and in almost every civilization. Therefore, we might call these values “human ethics”.		However, when we look closer at these “Chinese Ethics”, we discover, that they are claimed also in Indian Buddhism “karuna” and in the Christian tradition of “caritas” and in almost every civilization. Therefore, we might call these values “human ethics”.
		+
		+	中国伦理“扶贫济困”是中国文化的传统核心价值观。当我们今天坐在北京地铁时，扬声器的公告提醒我们，让弱势群体有座位是中国传统道德。我们知道曹雪芹，他支持穷人和处境不利的人，他为孩子们制作风筝。但是，当我们仔细观察这些“中国伦理学”时，我们发现，印度佛教“ karuna”，基督教的“明爱”传统以及几乎所有文明中也都声称拥有它们。因此，我们可以将这些价值观称为“人类道德”。--[[User:Wen Xiaoyi\|Wen Xiaoyi]] ([[User talk:Wen Xiaoyi\|talk]]) 15:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

	==Wu Kai 吴恺==		==Wu Kai 吴恺==

@@ Line 146: / Line 146: @@
 ==Gu Dongfang 顾东方==
 A sign for the increasing independence of the editors of essay anthologies from governmental or ideological handicaps, and for the increasing commercialization of the publishing houses with an orientation for customers (former: "readers").  Following the emotional essays of Zhu Ziqing who rank 1st and 2nd, ''nostalgia'' is the element of emotional identification in "''Wild vegetables of my home region''" by Zhou Zuoren, which ranks 3rd[	In Jia Pingwa's "Moon traces", which ranks 11, and in Ba Jin's "''Paradise for Birds''", which ranks 19].  Therefore one can state, that moving essays form the top.
 ==Guan Qinqing 管钦清==
 In 1927, Chinese literature took the form of 'engaged literature'.  In the 1980/90s, the discussion of politics in daily interest form a smaller part than in the 1920/30s. In the 1980s all genres including poems and essays were used for the critic against the master narrative of Communism or the Maoist understanding of art as serving ideology. In the later half of the 1990s, the master narrator himself seems to be lost within the subjectivity of individuals and everyday's profaneity and banality of a more and more formally organized but substantially empty citylife.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:04, 28 December 2020
Line 1,285:		Line 1,285:
	这些算法不仅针对明确的交流，也针对人类的情绪和思想，并预测未来的行为，因此允许模拟现实。更强大的算法也在社会中占据了决策角色：取代人类法庭的判决，及时微调和按需制作，审查聊天室等。一套算法有助于管理智慧城市和整个社会。--[[User:Yu Ni\|Yu Ni]] ([[User talk:Yu Ni\|talk]]) 10:34, 27 December 2020 (UTC)		这些算法不仅针对明确的交流，也针对人类的情绪和思想，并预测未来的行为，因此允许模拟现实。更强大的算法也在社会中占据了决策角色：取代人类法庭的判决，及时微调和按需制作，审查聊天室等。一套算法有助于管理智慧城市和整个社会。--[[User:Yu Ni\|Yu Ni]] ([[User talk:Yu Ni\|talk]]) 10:34, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

		+	这些算法不仅指向明确的信息交流，也指向人类的情感与思想，还会预测未来行为，因此能够模仿现实。更强大的算法在社会中更是占据决定性地位：他们会取代人类法庭判决，及时微调，按需生产，审查聊天室等等。成套的算法还能有助于管理智慧城市和整个社会。--[[User:Yi Huan\|Yi Huan]] ([[User talk:Yi Huan\|talk]]) 11:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

	----		----

@@ Line 1,226: / Line 1,226: @@
 ==Yi Huan 易欢==
 The variety of cultures is paralleled with the variety of elements of different dynasties, which makes it timeless and therefore even more a masterpiece of Chinese art and a masterpiece of human art. Therefore I would like to nominate the Red Chamber Dreams as “World Documentary Heritage”.
+文化的多样性与不同朝代的元素多样性相辅相成，这种多样性便其变得永恒，甚至因此而成为中国艺术杰作和人类艺术杰作。因此，我想提名《红楼梦》为“世界纪录片遗产”。--[[User:Yi Huan|Yi Huan]] ([[User talk:Yi Huan|talk]]) 10:47, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 '''References'''（参考文献不用翻译）

@@ Line 429: / Line 429: @@
 ==Lin Min 林敏==
 The May-Fourth group at that time was one voice among many and only succeeded because of its agitation and polemic in the public sphere, so we have to use new means to assign the Chinese essay its proper place. We learn from simplifiying narratives, that it is absolutely necessary to differentiate, and to reconstruct the complex time background. Having understood Chinese literature as determined by the development of fiction and poetry only, a broader understanding will change the whole appearance of Chinese literature. A scholarly endeavour is the use of modern literary theories in the approach to this genre.
 ==Lin Xin 林鑫==
 In the following, I will name three aspects (chronologically sorted by past, modern and contemporary time) to hold the argument, that the taking into consideration of the essay will rewrite the history of Chinese literature and change our current understanding of it.

@@ Line 995: / Line 995: @@
 小说作为一种文学题材不再仅仅记录一种文化，而是用沃尔特·本杰明的话来代表历史的有机物。因此，卢卡奇对这部小说的理解从历史转向哲学。一部小说被理解为其历史时代的典型小说，这部小说会体现时代精神（时代精神）。
 The ''Red Chamber Dreams'' are written in front of the background of the Manchu minority having taken over the power in formerly Han-shaped Ming-China (which was a multi-ethnic and crosscultural society) and families suffering the changing favor of changing emperors, with the Cao family being fostered by Kangxi and being persecuted by Yongzheng.
 《红楼梦》是在满族统治原汉族掌管的明朝（当时是一个多民族、跨文化的社会）和贵族家庭遭受皇位更迭影响的背景下写成的，曹氏家族受到康熙的扶植和雍正的迫害。--[[User:Wu Xiang|Wu Xiang]] ([[User talk:Wu Xiang|talk]]) 15:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 ==Wu Yilu 吴一露==