https://bou.de/u/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Report_CN_EN_13%3A13Report CN EN 13:13 - Revision history2026-04-04T18:00:52ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.35.14https://bou.de/u/index.php?title=Report_CN_EN_13:13&diff=154711&oldid=prevRoot: Replaced content with "This page has moved, please note the new website name: Report_CN_EN_13"2023-03-12T14:07:25Z<p>Replaced content with "This page has moved, please note the new website name: <a href="/u/wiki/Report_CN_EN_13" title="Report CN EN 13">Report_CN_EN_13</a>"</p>
<a href="https://bou.de/u/index.php?title=Report_CN_EN_13:13&diff=154711&oldid=154685">Show changes</a>Roothttps://bou.de/u/index.php?title=Report_CN_EN_13:13&diff=154685&oldid=prevRoot at 13:48, 12 March 20232023-03-12T13:48:46Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 13:48, 12 March 2023</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Please translate from Chinese to English and use the [[Report_CN_EN#List_of_Common_Terms]]. Also, you can jump back to the course homepage here: [[Chinese_Classics_Translation_Spring_2023]]</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">=Contents=</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">1. Translator 胡欣怡 Hu Xinyi《岭南万户皆春色》[[Lingnan Englisch]] Proofreader: 陈彦希 Chen Yanxi (translated until here: https://bou.de/u/wiki/Lingnan_Englisch#.E6.9D.8E.E6.A2.93.E7.8E.89_Li_Ziyu), rest: 76000 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2. Translator: 陈彦希 Chen Yanxi《金银潭抗疫纪事》[[Goldbank Englisch]] Proofreader: 李心田 Li Xintian (currently being translated by professionals), 120000 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">3. Translator: 李心田 Li Xintian [[Report_CN_EN_01]] Proofreader: 廖璐佳 Liao Lujia (currently being translated by professionals), 120000 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">4. Translator: 廖璐佳 Liao Lujia [[Report_CN_EN_02]] Proofreader: 谢佳玉 Xie Jiayu 《大记录》 1087 pp., 1176110 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">5. Translator: 谢佳玉 Xie Jiayu [[Report_CN_EN_03]] Proofreader: 张玉燕 Zhang Yuyan 《大记录》 1087 pp., 1176110 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">6. Translator: 张玉燕 Zhang Yuyan [[Report_CN_EN_04]] Proofreader: 周晓兰 Zhou Xiaolan《大记录》 1087 pp., 1176110 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">7. Translator: 周晓兰 Zhou Xiaolan [[Report_CN_EN_05]] Proofreader: 陈婧 Chen Jing《大记录》 1087 pp., 1176110 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">8. Translator: 陈婧 Chen Jing [[Report_CN_EN_06]] Proofreader: 梁昕璐 Liang Xinlu《大记录》 1087 pp., 1176110 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">9. Translator: 梁昕璐 Liang Xinlu [[Report_CN_EN_07]] Proofreader: 张文琦 Zhang Wenqi《大记录》 1087 pp., 1176110 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">10. Translator: 张文琦 Zhang Wenqi [[Report_CN_EN_08]] Proofreader: 付静 Fu Jing《大记录》 1087 pp., 1176110 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">11. Translator: 付静 Fu Jing [[Report_CN_EN_09]] Proofreader: 夏玲珑 Xia Linglong《大记录》 1087 pp., 1176110 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">12. Translator: 夏玲珑 Xia Linglong [[Report_CN_EN_10]] Proofreader: 李彦 Li Yan《大记录》 1087 pp., 1176110 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">13. Translator: 李彦 Li Yan [[Report_CN_EN_11]] Proofreader: 刘雨晴 Liu Yuqing《大记录》 1087 pp., 1176110 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">14. Translator: 刘雨晴 Liu Yuqing [[Report_CN_EN_12]] Proofreader: 王芳玲 Wang Fanglin《大记录》 1087 pp., 1176110 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">15. Translator: 王芳玲 Wang Fanglin [[Report_CN_EN_13]] Proofreader: 胡欣怡 Hu Xinyi《大记录》 1087 pp., 1176110 characters</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">=Wang Fanglin=</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>邓华凤那俯身倾斜的姿态挺有亲和力,我也一直在倾听,生怕漏掉了一个字。 经过邓华凤这样一番解释和梳理,我脑子里那些模棱两可、不明不白的问题逐渐清 晰明澈,事实真相也越来越清晰,我可以得出自己的结论了,“安徽万亩袁隆平超级稻减产绝收”的根本原因从头到尾都不是种子的问题,更与袁隆平没有什么关系, 除了前面提到的“极端气候”与“预防措施不到位”两个主因,还有一个原因就是该种子的“内外包装不一致”,若说“涉嫌造假”言重了,但也很有可能对农民产生误导。哪怕退ー万步讲,即便“两优0293”的根本原因就是种子问题,那也仅仅只是个别品种的问题,并不能说凡“杂交稻,隆平造”都有问题。这里以事实为依据, 2014年安徽“减产绝收”风波涉及的只是100多个超级稻品种中的一个小品种,其种植面积非常小,目前全国推广面积第一大、第二大、第三大的超级稻品种都没有问题,这些真相都不难搞清楚,若从最基本的客观、公正和真实的立场来说,都没有必要“向整个超级稻泼脏水”,这不是我的话,而是袁隆平先生的原话。</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>邓华凤那俯身倾斜的姿态挺有亲和力,我也一直在倾听,生怕漏掉了一个字。 经过邓华凤这样一番解释和梳理,我脑子里那些模棱两可、不明不白的问题逐渐清 晰明澈,事实真相也越来越清晰,我可以得出自己的结论了,“安徽万亩袁隆平超级稻减产绝收”的根本原因从头到尾都不是种子的问题,更与袁隆平没有什么关系, 除了前面提到的“极端气候”与“预防措施不到位”两个主因,还有一个原因就是该种子的“内外包装不一致”,若说“涉嫌造假”言重了,但也很有可能对农民产生误导。哪怕退ー万步讲,即便“两优0293”的根本原因就是种子问题,那也仅仅只是个别品种的问题,并不能说凡“杂交稻,隆平造”都有问题。这里以事实为依据, 2014年安徽“减产绝收”风波涉及的只是100多个超级稻品种中的一个小品种,其种植面积非常小,目前全国推广面积第一大、第二大、第三大的超级稻品种都没有问题,这些真相都不难搞清楚,若从最基本的客观、公正和真实的立场来说,都没有必要“向整个超级稻泼脏水”,这不是我的话,而是袁隆平先生的原话。</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
</table>Roothttps://bou.de/u/index.php?title=Report_CN_EN_13:13&diff=154663&oldid=prevWang Fangling at 13:11, 12 March 20232023-03-12T13:11:12Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 13:11, 12 March 2023</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>邓华凤那俯身倾斜的姿态挺有亲和力,我也一直在倾听,生怕漏掉了一个字。 经过邓华凤这样一番解释和梳理,我脑子里那些模棱两可、不明不白的问题逐渐清 晰明澈,事实真相也越来越清晰,我可以得出自己的结论了,“安徽万亩袁隆平超级稻减产绝收”的根本原因从头到尾都不是种子的问题,更与袁隆平没有什么关系, 除了前面提到的“极端气候”与“预防措施不到位”两个主因,还有一个原因就是该种子的“内外包装不一致”,若说“涉嫌造假”言重了,但也很有可能对农民产生误导。哪怕退ー万步讲,即便“两优0293”的根本原因就是种子问题,那也仅仅只是个别品种的问题,并不能说凡“杂交稻,隆平造”都有问题。这里以事实为依据, 2014年安徽“减产绝收”风波涉及的只是100多个超级稻品种中的一个小品种,其种植面积非常小,目前全国推广面积第一大、第二大、第三大的超级稻品种都没有问题,这些真相都不难搞清楚,若从最基本的客观、公正和真实的立场来说,都没有必要“向整个超级稻泼脏水”,这不是我的话,而是袁隆平先生的原话。</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>邓华凤那俯身倾斜的姿态挺有亲和力,我也一直在倾听,生怕漏掉了一个字。 经过邓华凤这样一番解释和梳理,我脑子里那些模棱两可、不明不白的问题逐渐清 晰明澈,事实真相也越来越清晰,我可以得出自己的结论了,“安徽万亩袁隆平超级稻减产绝收”的根本原因从头到尾都不是种子的问题,更与袁隆平没有什么关系, 除了前面提到的“极端气候”与“预防措施不到位”两个主因,还有一个原因就是该种子的“内外包装不一致”,若说“涉嫌造假”言重了,但也很有可能对农民产生误导。哪怕退ー万步讲,即便“两优0293”的根本原因就是种子问题,那也仅仅只是个别品种的问题,并不能说凡“杂交稻,隆平造”都有问题。这里以事实为依据, 2014年安徽“减产绝收”风波涉及的只是100多个超级稻品种中的一个小品种,其种植面积非常小,目前全国推广面积第一大、第二大、第三大的超级稻品种都没有问题,这些真相都不难搞清楚,若从最基本的客观、公正和真实的立场来说,都没有必要“向整个超级稻泼脏水”,这不是我的话,而是袁隆平先生的原话。</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I have been listening, afraid to miss a word from Deng Huafeng who has a quite affable leaning posture. After his explanation and rethinking, I emptied ambiguous and uncertain questions in my mind so that I drew my own conclusion and a clearer truth. " From beginning to the end, the fundamental reason behind “yield loss of 10000 mu Yuan Longping super rice in Anhui” didn’t lie in seeds, let alone to have something to do with Yuan. In addition to the two main causes of "extreme weather" and "inadequate precautionary measures" mentioned earlier, there is another reason for the "inconsistency of the inner and outer packaging" of the seeds for which "suspected counterfeiting" is too much, but which is also likely to mislead farmers. Even if we take a step back, even if the root cause of the "two superior 0293" is the seed problem, it is only a problem of individual varieties instead of all "hybrid rice, made by Longping".. Here based on the facts, the 2014 Anhui "yield loss" storm involves only a small variety, which has small planting area, of more than 100 varieties of super rice. It is not difficult to figure out that the first, second and third largest varieties of super rice which are promoted to have been planted nationwide have no problem. If we take the most basic objective, fair and true position, there is no need to "throw mud at the whole super rice", this is not my words, but the original words of Mr. Yuan Longping.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I have been listening, afraid to miss a word from Deng Huafeng who has a quite affable leaning posture. After his explanation and rethinking, I emptied ambiguous and uncertain questions in my mind so that I drew my own conclusion and a clearer truth. " From beginning to the end, the fundamental reason behind “yield loss of 10000 mu Yuan Longping super rice in Anhui” didn’t lie in seeds, let alone to have something to do with Yuan. In addition to the two main causes of "extreme weather" and "inadequate precautionary measures" mentioned earlier, there is another reason for the "inconsistency of the inner and outer packaging" of the seeds for which "suspected counterfeiting" is too much, but which is also likely to mislead farmers. Even if we take a step back, even if the root cause of the "two superior 0293" is the seed problem, it is only a problem of individual varieties instead of all "hybrid rice, made by Longping".. Here based on the facts, the 2014 Anhui "yield loss" storm involves only a small variety, which has small planting area, of more than 100 varieties of super rice. It is not difficult to figure out that the first, second and third largest varieties of super rice which are promoted to have been planted nationwide have no problem. If we take the most basic objective, fair and true position, there is no need to "throw mud at the whole super rice", this is not my words, but the original words of Mr. Yuan Longping.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>我与邓华凤握手告别时,他又坦诚地表示,“安徽万亩水稻减产绝收事件”不 管由谁负责,对所有农业工作者来说,这都是ー个值得吸取的教训,未来对水稻品 种的研究,抗性将会放到更重要的位置,如何研发广适性更好的新品种,一直是所 有“杂交水稻人”努力的目标。他这一席话,让我看到了科学的境界,一篇关乎科 学的报道,必须尊重科学和新闻真实性这ー底线,任何一家媒体都可以对某ー焦点 问题采取“新闻系列追踪报道”,这是新闻工作者的权利,也是天职,但除了权利还 必须恪守职业道德和新闻伦理。如果一家媒体反复炒作一场原本不该发生的灾 难,又不顾及完整的事实真相,攻其一点,不及其余,由此而掀起一轮又一轮的风 浪,对于科学、对于人类,这又何尝不是一场不该发生的灾难?用袁隆平先生的话 说,这是“居心不良”。但说句心里话,我还真没有从“居心不良”上来猜测报道者, 我尽可能从善良的意愿来理解他们,这让我挺佩服他们,而他们的质疑和追问或许 会成为推动科技进步的另ー种力量。至少对于我,正是因为他们的报道,我オ把目 光投向了他们抓住的两个焦点,ー个是产量,ー个是质量,而以袁隆平为代表的中 国科研人员研发的杂交稻、超级稻,在他们看来“被强调的是产量,被忽视的是质 量”一这两个问题在我脑子里也闪回了无数次,一直都很纠结又难辨真相,我相 信这也是亿万中国人最揪心的两个问题:袁隆平为什么一直不遗余力地在创造超 高产的杂交稻?为了追求超高产,袁隆平又是否无暇顾及或根本不顾杂交稻和超 级稻的质量?</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>我与邓华凤握手告别时,他又坦诚地表示,“安徽万亩水稻减产绝收事件”不 管由谁负责,对所有农业工作者来说,这都是ー个值得吸取的教训,未来对水稻品 种的研究,抗性将会放到更重要的位置,如何研发广适性更好的新品种,一直是所 有“杂交水稻人”努力的目标。他这一席话,让我看到了科学的境界,一篇关乎科 学的报道,必须尊重科学和新闻真实性这ー底线,任何一家媒体都可以对某ー焦点 问题采取“新闻系列追踪报道”,这是新闻工作者的权利,也是天职,但除了权利还 必须恪守职业道德和新闻伦理。如果一家媒体反复炒作一场原本不该发生的灾 难,又不顾及完整的事实真相,攻其一点,不及其余,由此而掀起一轮又一轮的风 浪,对于科学、对于人类,这又何尝不是一场不该发生的灾难?用袁隆平先生的话 说,这是“居心不良”。但说句心里话,我还真没有从“居心不良”上来猜测报道者, 我尽可能从善良的意愿来理解他们,这让我挺佩服他们,而他们的质疑和追问或许 会成为推动科技进步的另ー种力量。至少对于我,正是因为他们的报道,我オ把目 光投向了他们抓住的两个焦点,ー个是产量,ー个是质量,而以袁隆平为代表的中 国科研人员研发的杂交稻、超级稻,在他们看来“被强调的是产量,被忽视的是质 量”一这两个问题在我脑子里也闪回了无数次,一直都很纠结又难辨真相,我相 信这也是亿万中国人最揪心的两个问题:袁隆平为什么一直不遗余力地在创造超 高产的杂交稻?为了追求超高产,袁隆平又是否无暇顾及或根本不顾杂交稻和超 级稻的质量?</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>When I was shaking hands with Deng Huafeng in farewell, he also said, frankly, every worker in agricultural field should learn from a lesson from" 10,000 mu rice yield loss incident in Anhui". Resistance should be put in a more important position in future research on rice varieties. The common goal of all "hybrid rice people" is to develop new varieties with better adaptability. His words had enlightenment on me that the bottom line of reporting on science is respecting science and journalistic authenticity. It is the right and nature for journalists to, focus on "news series tracking" of a certain issue However, a journalist must also adhere to professional and journalism ethics. If a media repeatedly speculates on a disaster that should not have happened without taking into account the complete truth thus setting off a wave after wave, how is this not a disaster that should not happen for science as well as mankind? According to Mr. Yuan, this is "ill-intentioned". To be honest, I really try to understand reporters from good will instead of speculating them from the "bad intention". I admire them because their questioning and probing may become another kind of power to promote the progress of science and technology. At least for me, it is because of their reports that I have shifted my attention to the two focal points they have seized upon, one being yield and the other quality.In their minds, the emphasis of hybrid rice or super hybrid rice, developed by Chinese researchers with Yuan Longping as a representative, has been on” yield instead of quality.”. I believe these are also the two most troubling questions for hundreds of millions of Chinese people: Why has Yuan spared no effort to create super-high yielding hybrid rice? In the pursuit of super high yield, did Yuan have no time to care about or just ignore the quality of hybrid rice and super rice? These questions appeared in my minds for thousands of times, which is hard to answer.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>When I was shaking hands with Deng Huafeng in farewell, he also said, frankly, every worker in agricultural field should learn from a lesson from" 10,000 mu rice yield loss incident in Anhui". Resistance should be put in a more important position in future research on rice varieties. The common goal of all "hybrid rice people" is to develop new varieties with better adaptability. His words had enlightenment on me that the bottom line of reporting on science is respecting science and journalistic authenticity. It is the right and nature for journalists to, focus on "news series tracking" of a certain issue However, a journalist must also adhere to professional and journalism ethics. If a media repeatedly speculates on a disaster that should not have happened without taking into account the complete truth thus setting off a wave after wave, how is this not a disaster that should not happen for science as well as mankind? According to Mr. Yuan, this is "ill-intentioned". To be honest, I really try to understand reporters from good will instead of speculating them from the "bad intention". I admire them because their questioning and probing may become another kind of power to promote the progress of science and technology. At least for me, it is because of their reports that I have shifted my attention to the two focal points they have seized upon, one being yield and the other quality.In their minds, the emphasis of hybrid rice or super hybrid rice, developed by Chinese researchers with Yuan Longping as a representative, has been on” yield instead of quality.”. I believe these are also the two most troubling questions for hundreds of millions of Chinese people: Why has Yuan spared no effort to create super-high yielding hybrid rice? In the pursuit of super high yield, did Yuan have no time to care about or just ignore the quality of hybrid rice and super rice? These questions appeared in my minds for thousands of times, which is hard to answer.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
</table>Wang Fanglinghttps://bou.de/u/index.php?title=Report_CN_EN_13:13&diff=154662&oldid=prevWang Fangling at 13:08, 12 March 20232023-03-12T13:08:57Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 13:08, 12 March 2023</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>邓华凤那俯身倾斜的姿态挺有亲和力,我也一直在倾听,生怕漏掉了一个字。 经过邓华凤这样一番解释和梳理,我脑子里那些模棱两可、不明不白的问题逐渐清 晰明澈,事实真相也越来越清晰,我可以得出自己的结论了,<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">“安徽万亩袁隆平超级 稻减产绝收”的根本原因从头到尾都不是种子的问题</del>,更与袁隆平没有什么关系, 除了前面提到的“极端气候”与“预防措施不到位”两个主因,<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">还有一个原因就是该 种子的“内外包装不一致”</del>,若说“涉嫌造假”言重了,<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">但也很有可能对农民产生误 导。哪怕退ー万步讲</del>,即便“两优0293”的根本原因就是种子问题,<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">那也仅仅只是 个别品种的问题</del>,并不能说凡“杂交稻,隆平造”都有问题。这里以事实为依据, 2014年安徽“减产绝收”风波涉及的只是100多个超级稻品种中的一个小品种,<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">其 种植面积非常小</del>,<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">目前全国推广面积第一大、第二大、第三大的超级稻品种都没有 问题</del>,这些真相都不难搞清楚,若从最基本的客观、公正和真实的立场来说,<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">都没有</del></div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>邓华凤那俯身倾斜的姿态挺有亲和力,我也一直在倾听,生怕漏掉了一个字。 经过邓华凤这样一番解释和梳理,我脑子里那些模棱两可、不明不白的问题逐渐清 晰明澈,事实真相也越来越清晰,我可以得出自己的结论了,<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">“安徽万亩袁隆平超级稻减产绝收”的根本原因从头到尾都不是种子的问题</ins>,更与袁隆平没有什么关系, 除了前面提到的“极端气候”与“预防措施不到位”两个主因,<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">还有一个原因就是该种子的“内外包装不一致”</ins>,若说“涉嫌造假”言重了,<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">但也很有可能对农民产生误导。哪怕退ー万步讲</ins>,即便“两优0293”的根本原因就是种子问题,<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">那也仅仅只是个别品种的问题</ins>,并不能说凡“杂交稻,隆平造”都有问题。这里以事实为依据, 2014年安徽“减产绝收”风波涉及的只是100多个超级稻品种中的一个小品种,<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">其种植面积非常小</ins>,<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">目前全国推广面积第一大、第二大、第三大的超级稻品种都没有问题</ins>,这些真相都不难搞清楚,若从最基本的客观、公正和真实的立场来说,<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">都没有必要“向整个超级稻泼脏水”,这不是我的话,而是袁隆平先生的原话。</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">I have been listening, afraid to miss a word from Deng Huafeng who has a quite affable leaning posture. After his explanation and rethinking, I emptied ambiguous and uncertain questions in my mind so that I drew my own conclusion and a clearer truth. " From beginning to the end, the fundamental reason behind “yield loss of 10000 mu Yuan Longping super rice in Anhui” didn’t lie in seeds, let alone to have something to do with Yuan. In addition to the two main causes of "extreme weather" and "inadequate precautionary measures" mentioned earlier, there is another reason for the "inconsistency of the inner and outer packaging" of the seeds for which "suspected counterfeiting" is too much, but which is also likely to mislead farmers. Even if we take a step back, even if the root cause of the "two superior 0293" is the seed problem, it is only a problem of individual varieties instead of all "hybrid rice, made by Longping".. Here based on the facts, the 2014 Anhui "yield loss" storm involves only a small variety, which has small planting area, of more than 100 varieties of super rice. It is not difficult to figure out that the first, second and third largest varieties of super rice which are promoted to have been planted nationwide have no problem. If we take the most basic objective, fair and true position, there is no need to "throw mud at the whole super rice", this is not my words, but the original words of Mr. Yuan Longping.</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">必要“向整个超级稻泼脏水”,这不是我的话,而是袁隆平先生的原话。</del></div></td><td colspan="2"> </td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>我与邓华凤握手告别时,他又坦诚地表示,“安徽万亩水稻减产绝收事件”不 管由谁负责,对所有农业工作者来说,这都是ー个值得吸取的教训,未来对水稻品 种的研究,抗性将会放到更重要的位置,如何研发广适性更好的新品种,一直是所 有“杂交水稻人”努力的目标。他这一席话,让我看到了科学的境界,一篇关乎科 学的报道,必须尊重科学和新闻真实性这ー底线,任何一家媒体都可以对某ー焦点 问题采取“新闻系列追踪报道”,这是新闻工作者的权利,也是天职,但除了权利还 必须恪守职业道德和新闻伦理。如果一家媒体反复炒作一场原本不该发生的灾 难,又不顾及完整的事实真相,攻其一点,不及其余,由此而掀起一轮又一轮的风 浪,对于科学、对于人类,这又何尝不是一场不该发生的灾难?用袁隆平先生的话 说,这是“居心不良”。但说句心里话,我还真没有从“居心不良”上来猜测报道者, 我尽可能从善良的意愿来理解他们,这让我挺佩服他们,而他们的质疑和追问或许 会成为推动科技进步的另ー种力量。至少对于我,正是因为他们的报道,我オ把目 光投向了他们抓住的两个焦点,ー个是产量,ー个是质量,而以袁隆平为代表的中 国科研人员研发的杂交稻、超级稻,在他们看来“被强调的是产量,被忽视的是质 量”一这两个问题在我脑子里也闪回了无数次,一直都很纠结又难辨真相,我相 信这也是亿万中国人最揪心的两个问题:袁隆平为什么一直不遗余力地在创造超 高产的杂交稻?为了追求超高产,袁隆平又是否无暇顾及或根本不顾杂交稻和超 级稻的质量?</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>我与邓华凤握手告别时,他又坦诚地表示,“安徽万亩水稻减产绝收事件”不 管由谁负责,对所有农业工作者来说,这都是ー个值得吸取的教训,未来对水稻品 种的研究,抗性将会放到更重要的位置,如何研发广适性更好的新品种,一直是所 有“杂交水稻人”努力的目标。他这一席话,让我看到了科学的境界,一篇关乎科 学的报道,必须尊重科学和新闻真实性这ー底线,任何一家媒体都可以对某ー焦点 问题采取“新闻系列追踪报道”,这是新闻工作者的权利,也是天职,但除了权利还 必须恪守职业道德和新闻伦理。如果一家媒体反复炒作一场原本不该发生的灾 难,又不顾及完整的事实真相,攻其一点,不及其余,由此而掀起一轮又一轮的风 浪,对于科学、对于人类,这又何尝不是一场不该发生的灾难?用袁隆平先生的话 说,这是“居心不良”。但说句心里话,我还真没有从“居心不良”上来猜测报道者, 我尽可能从善良的意愿来理解他们,这让我挺佩服他们,而他们的质疑和追问或许 会成为推动科技进步的另ー种力量。至少对于我,正是因为他们的报道,我オ把目 光投向了他们抓住的两个焦点,ー个是产量,ー个是质量,而以袁隆平为代表的中 国科研人员研发的杂交稻、超级稻,在他们看来“被强调的是产量,被忽视的是质 量”一这两个问题在我脑子里也闪回了无数次,一直都很纠结又难辨真相,我相 信这也是亿万中国人最揪心的两个问题:袁隆平为什么一直不遗余力地在创造超 高产的杂交稻?为了追求超高产,袁隆平又是否无暇顾及或根本不顾杂交稻和超 级稻的质量?</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">When I was shaking hands with Deng Huafeng in farewell, he also said, frankly, every worker in agricultural field should learn from a lesson from" 10,000 mu rice yield loss incident in Anhui". Resistance should be put in a more important position in future research on rice varieties. The common goal of all "hybrid rice people" is to develop new varieties with better adaptability. His words had enlightenment on me that the bottom line of reporting on science is respecting science and journalistic authenticity. It is the right and nature for journalists to, focus on "news series tracking" of a certain issue However, a journalist must also adhere to professional and journalism ethics. If a media repeatedly speculates on a disaster that should not have happened without taking into account the complete truth thus setting off a wave after wave, how is this not a disaster that should not happen for science as well as mankind? According to Mr. Yuan, this is "ill-intentioned". To be honest, I really try to understand reporters from good will instead of speculating them from the "bad intention". I admire them because their questioning and probing may become another kind of power to promote the progress of science and technology. At least for me, it is because of their reports that I have shifted my attention to the two focal points they have seized upon, one being yield and the other quality.In their minds, the emphasis of hybrid rice or super hybrid rice, developed by Chinese researchers with Yuan Longping as a representative, has been on” yield instead of quality.”. I believe these are also the two most troubling questions for hundreds of millions of Chinese people: Why has Yuan spared no effort to create super-high yielding hybrid rice? In the pursuit of super high yield, did Yuan have no time to care about or just ignore the quality of hybrid rice and super rice? These questions appeared in my minds for thousands of times, which is hard to answer.</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>这两个焦点其实又可归结为ー个主题一舌尖上的安危。</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>这两个焦点其实又可归结为ー个主题一舌尖上的安危。</div></td></tr>
</table>Wang Fanglinghttps://bou.de/u/index.php?title=Report_CN_EN_13:13&diff=154603&oldid=prevChen Jing 1: Created page with "邓华凤那俯身倾斜的姿态挺有亲和力,我也一直在倾听,生怕漏掉了一个字。 经过邓华凤这样一番解释和梳理,我脑子里那些模棱两可、..."2023-03-11T15:21:46Z<p>Created page with "邓华凤那俯身倾斜的姿态挺有亲和力,我也一直在倾听,生怕漏掉了一个字。 经过邓华凤这样一番解释和梳理,我脑子里那些模棱两可、..."</p>
<a href="https://bou.de/u/index.php?title=Report_CN_EN_13:13&diff=154603">Show changes</a>Chen Jing 1