Talk:Ba Jin - Revision history

Random1 at 00:26, 7 December 2012

2012-12-07T00:26:11Z

2012-12-06T22:27:29Z

2012-12-06T22:18:49Z

2012-12-05T08:23:46Z

2012-12-05T07:02:23Z

2012-12-05T06:57:34Z

2012-12-05T06:42:45Z

2012-12-05T04:16:57Z

Created page with 'Looks great, could use some more pictures though. ~~~~'

New page

Looks great, could use some more pictures though. [[User:Pips|Pips]] 04:16, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:26, 7 December 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Very good, you really tried to describe the real Ba Jin. Sources mentioned at the end of the paragraphs. Thanks that you later still uploaded your ppt. [[User:Root\|Root]] 22:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)		Very good, you really tried to describe the real Ba Jin. Sources mentioned at the end of the paragraphs. Thanks that you later still uploaded your ppt. [[User:Root\|Root]] 22:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	The citation and citing of sources was way better then mine. The views seemed like they could say more of your own opinion. [[User:Random1\|Random1]] 00:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 6 December 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Not bad, but you could still cite your sources better. And I agree with them, it could use more pictures than just the one portrait of him. [[User:Mingemperor\|Mingemperor]] 08:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC)		Not bad, but you could still cite your sources better. And I agree with them, it could use more pictures than just the one portrait of him. [[User:Mingemperor\|Mingemperor]] 08:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
	It looks great! I' m curious as to the what people think now of what he wrote.[[User:Pips\|Pips]] 22:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)		It looks great! I' m curious as to the what people think now of what he wrote.[[User:Pips\|Pips]] 22:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	Very good, you really tried to describe the real Ba Jin. Sources mentioned at the end of the paragraphs. Thanks that you later still uploaded your ppt. [[User:Root\|Root]] 22:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 6 December 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Not bad, but you could still cite your sources better. And I agree with them, it could use more pictures than just the one portrait of him. [[User:Mingemperor\|Mingemperor]] 08:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC)		Not bad, but you could still cite your sources better. And I agree with them, it could use more pictures than just the one portrait of him. [[User:Mingemperor\|Mingemperor]] 08:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
		+	It looks great! I' m curious as to the what people think now of what he wrote.[[User:Pips\|Pips]] 22:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:23, 5 December 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I was wondering if people today still see Ba Jin as a traitor or they have changed their mind. I did enjoyed they way you wrote this paper, thanks. Reddragon [[User:Reddragon\|Reddragon]] 07:02, 5 December 2012 (UTC)		I was wondering if people today still see Ba Jin as a traitor or they have changed their mind. I did enjoyed they way you wrote this paper, thanks. Reddragon [[User:Reddragon\|Reddragon]] 07:02, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	Not bad, but you could still cite your sources better. And I agree with them, it could use more pictures than just the one portrait of him. [[User:Mingemperor\|Mingemperor]] 08:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:02, 5 December 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Love the length of this paper and the depth. I agree with the pictures, but I understand because I couldnt find sufficient pictures to use myself. Overall a good paper.--[[User:Foot\|Foot]] 06:57, 5 December 2012 (UTC)		Love the length of this paper and the depth. I agree with the pictures, but I understand because I couldnt find sufficient pictures to use myself. Overall a good paper.--[[User:Foot\|Foot]] 06:57, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	I was wondering if people today still see Ba Jin as a traitor or they have changed their mind. I did enjoyed they way you wrote this paper, thanks. Reddragon [[User:Reddragon\|Reddragon]] 07:02, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:57, 5 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Looks great, could use some more pictures though. [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 04:16, 5 December 2012 (UTC)		Looks great, could use some more pictures though. [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 04:16, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

−	Love the length of this paper and the depth. I agree with the pictures, but I understand because I couldnt find sufficient pictures to use myself. Overall a good paper.	+	Love the length of this paper and the depth. I agree with the pictures, but I understand because I couldnt find sufficient pictures to use myself. Overall a good paper.--[[User:Foot\|Foot]] 06:57, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:42, 5 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Looks great, could use some more pictures though. [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 04:16, 5 December 2012 (UTC)		Looks great, could use some more pictures though. [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 04:16, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	Love the length of this paper and the depth. I agree with the pictures, but I understand because I couldnt find sufficient pictures to use myself. Overall a good paper.