Talk:Du Fu - Revision history

Root at 23:27, 4 March 2013

2013-03-04T23:27:08Z

Chameleon: /* New comments in 2013 */

2013-03-02T02:20:00Z

New comments in 2013

Ignatius J Reilly: /* New comments in 2013 */

2013-03-01T21:54:19Z

New comments in 2013

Joshua B. at 18:37, 1 March 2013

2013-03-01T18:37:58Z

Samantha S at 02:16, 1 March 2013

2013-03-01T02:16:30Z

TaraDFroisland: /* New comments in 2013 */

2013-02-27T23:43:03Z

New comments in 2013

Root at 12:58, 25 February 2013

2013-02-25T12:58:27Z

Whatisthis at 07:05, 5 March 2012

2012-03-05T07:05:59Z

Checksum: /* comment */ new section

2012-03-05T03:39:40Z

comment: new section

Alchemist1330 at 23:26, 4 March 2012

2012-03-04T23:26:03Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =New comments in 2013=
 Excellent! Really enjoyed your article. It's especially fun because you know Chinese and have a better idea of the effect translation has on the poetry. Nicely done. --[[User:Chameleon|Chameleon]] ([[User talk:Chameleon|talk]]) 03:20, 2 March 2013 (CET)
 Brandon! Your article is quite outstanding. I am impressed with the organization and am going to implement some of it in my next article because I feel that it helps things flow a bit better and move along. I would suggest though that when you have the two poems (one in Chinese and one in translation) that you put them side by side so you can tell more easily that they belong together. Also it would show the contrast between the two languages which would be a cool visual to add to what you already have. [[User:Samantha S|Samantha S]] ([[User talk:Samantha S|talk]]) 03:16, 1 March 2013 (CET)
 WOW! I have nothing to say that could really help you. My only suggestion could be to expand your conclusion, but even then I dont know if it really needs it.  --[[User:TaraDFroisland|MerchantThief]] ([[User talk:TaraDFroisland|talk]]) 00:43, 28 February 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:20, 2 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=New comments in 2013=		=New comments in 2013=
		+
		+	Excellent! Really enjoyed your article. It's especially fun because you know Chinese and have a better idea of the effect translation has on the poetry. Nicely done. --[[User:Chameleon\|Chameleon]] ([[User talk:Chameleon\|talk]]) 03:20, 2 March 2013 (CET)
		+
	Brandon! Your article is quite outstanding. I am impressed with the organization and am going to implement some of it in my next article because I feel that it helps things flow a bit better and move along. I would suggest though that when you have the two poems (one in Chinese and one in translation) that you put them side by side so you can tell more easily that they belong together. Also it would show the contrast between the two languages which would be a cool visual to add to what you already have. [[User:Samantha S\|Samantha S]] ([[User talk:Samantha S\|talk]]) 03:16, 1 March 2013 (CET)		Brandon! Your article is quite outstanding. I am impressed with the organization and am going to implement some of it in my next article because I feel that it helps things flow a bit better and move along. I would suggest though that when you have the two poems (one in Chinese and one in translation) that you put them side by side so you can tell more easily that they belong together. Also it would show the contrast between the two languages which would be a cool visual to add to what you already have. [[User:Samantha S\|Samantha S]] ([[User talk:Samantha S\|talk]]) 03:16, 1 March 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 1 March 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Great Article. I like the use of Chinese Characters to go along with the sections. My only suggestions would be perhaps a few more photos so we can get a more visual experience with Du Fu. --[[User:Joshua B.\|Joshua B.]] ([[User talk:Joshua B.\|talk]]) 19:37, 1 March 2013 (CET)		Great Article. I like the use of Chinese Characters to go along with the sections. My only suggestions would be perhaps a few more photos so we can get a more visual experience with Du Fu. --[[User:Joshua B.\|Joshua B.]] ([[User talk:Joshua B.\|talk]]) 19:37, 1 March 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	Wow, indeed! Very cool. I don't really see a need for pictures because the page is so well-written. Excellent. My favorite one yet. [[User:Ignatius J Reilly\|Ignatius J Reilly]] ([[User talk:Ignatius J Reilly\|talk]]) 22:54, 1 March 2013 (CET)

	=Old comments=		=Old comments=

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:37, 1 March 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:

	WOW! I have nothing to say that could really help you. My only suggestion could be to expand your conclusion, but even then I dont know if it really needs it. --[[User:TaraDFroisland\|MerchantThief]] ([[User talk:TaraDFroisland\|talk]]) 00:43, 28 February 2013 (CET)		WOW! I have nothing to say that could really help you. My only suggestion could be to expand your conclusion, but even then I dont know if it really needs it. --[[User:TaraDFroisland\|MerchantThief]] ([[User talk:TaraDFroisland\|talk]]) 00:43, 28 February 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	Great Article. I like the use of Chinese Characters to go along with the sections. My only suggestions would be perhaps a few more photos so we can get a more visual experience with Du Fu. --[[User:Joshua B.\|Joshua B.]] ([[User talk:Joshua B.\|talk]]) 19:37, 1 March 2013 (CET)

	=Old comments=		=Old comments=

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:16, 1 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=New comments in 2013=		=New comments in 2013=
		+	Brandon! Your article is quite outstanding. I am impressed with the organization and am going to implement some of it in my next article because I feel that it helps things flow a bit better and move along. I would suggest though that when you have the two poems (one in Chinese and one in translation) that you put them side by side so you can tell more easily that they belong together. Also it would show the contrast between the two languages which would be a cool visual to add to what you already have. [[User:Samantha S\|Samantha S]] ([[User talk:Samantha S\|talk]]) 03:16, 1 March 2013 (CET)
		+
	Dear Brandon, impressive! Can you try to add a little bit more from the commentator role (maybe indicated by "Contemporary Commentator" and then evaluate and discuss the topic from different angles, put it into context, criticize etc.). Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] ([[User talk:Root\|talk]]) 13:58, 25 February 2013 (CET)		Dear Brandon, impressive! Can you try to add a little bit more from the commentator role (maybe indicated by "Contemporary Commentator" and then evaluate and discuss the topic from different angles, put it into context, criticize etc.). Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] ([[User talk:Root\|talk]]) 13:58, 25 February 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 25 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	=New comments in 2013=
		+	Dear Brandon, impressive! Can you try to add a little bit more from the commentator role (maybe indicated by "Contemporary Commentator" and then evaluate and discuss the topic from different angles, put it into context, criticize etc.). Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] ([[User talk:Root\|talk]]) 13:58, 25 February 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	=Old comments=
	Good start, I'm impressed- your English writing is quite good. Just a word of advice, double check your spelling ( I have trouble with that too!). I corrected a couple of errors for you ("poets" instead of "poems" etc,).		Good start, I'm impressed- your English writing is quite good. Just a word of advice, double check your spelling ( I have trouble with that too!). I corrected a couple of errors for you ("poets" instead of "poems" etc,).

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:05, 5 March 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	But I love your tone and it is written very well, just needs meat on its bones.		But I love your tone and it is written very well, just needs meat on its bones.
	You will hear more from me later!--[[User:Checksum\|Checksum]] 03:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)		You will hear more from me later!--[[User:Checksum\|Checksum]] 03:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	== Comment ==
		+	Late comment, but it seems a bit short... --[[User:Whatisthis\|Whatisthis]] 07:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:39, 5 March 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	===Alchemist1330===		===Alchemist1330===
	I generally like it so far. for your aurument you can analize a poem of your ffrom your point of view like WANTONG not Du Fu and support your claims. bye bye... black bird		I generally like it so far. for your aurument you can analize a poem of your ffrom your point of view like WANTONG not Du Fu and support your claims. bye bye... black bird
		+
		+	== comment ==
		+
		+	I would <3 a picture. Or two. Or five. x3
		+	But I love your tone and it is written very well, just needs meat on its bones.
		+	You will hear more from me later!--[[User:Checksum\|Checksum]] 03:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 4 March 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Have you decided on an argument yet? One option is that you could argue about what had the strongest affect on Du Fu's writing; Taoism, Buddhism, his travels, other poets, personal experiences, or the Classics. You could contrast Du Fu with other poets of the time to prove how he was unique and a rebel, or you could compare him to other poets to show that he wasn't too different. You could try explaining why you think he wasn't popular during his lifetime and why he became popular later. You could argue that he was the best poet, or point out his flaws. You could even do a combination of these things. [[User:Name\|Name]] 08:02, 4 March 2012 (UTC)		Have you decided on an argument yet? One option is that you could argue about what had the strongest affect on Du Fu's writing; Taoism, Buddhism, his travels, other poets, personal experiences, or the Classics. You could contrast Du Fu with other poets of the time to prove how he was unique and a rebel, or you could compare him to other poets to show that he wasn't too different. You could try explaining why you think he wasn't popular during his lifetime and why he became popular later. You could argue that he was the best poet, or point out his flaws. You could even do a combination of these things. [[User:Name\|Name]] 08:02, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	===Alchemist1330===
		+	I generally like it so far. for your aurument you can analize a poem of your ffrom your point of view like WANTONG not Du Fu and support your claims. bye bye... black bird