Talk:Han Han - Revision history

Root at 22:38, 6 December 2012

2012-12-06T22:38:43Z

Pips at 22:29, 6 December 2012

2012-12-06T22:29:02Z

Root at 21:02, 6 December 2012

2012-12-06T21:02:41Z

Foot: Created page with 'Looked like you went well into depth in your presentation, and I assume that your paper will be equally as brilliant. --~~~~'

2012-12-05T06:59:21Z

Created page with 'Looked like you went well into depth in your presentation, and I assume that your paper will be equally as brilliant. --~~~~'

New page

Looked like you went well into depth in your presentation, and I assume that your paper will be equally as brilliant. --[[User:Foot|Foot]] 06:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Looked like you went well into depth in your presentation, and I assume that your paper will be equally as brilliant. --[[User:Foot|Foot]] 06:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
-The version I got by email looks good to me. However, there are some similarities and even taken over parts from Wikipedia. Also the sources should be mentioned in a more detailed way, sometimes you only mention article title and journal title, without year, issue etc. Best, [[User:Root|Root]] 21:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
+The version I got by email looks good to me. However, there are some similarities with Wikipedia (the ones not added there by you). Also the sources should be mentioned in a more detailed way, sometimes you only mention article title and journal title, without year, issue etc. Best, [[User:Root|Root]] 21:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 I liked your presentation. You seemed to answer in ways that he would have.[[User:Pips|Pips]] 22:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 6 December 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The version I got by email looks good to me. However, there are some similarities and even taken over parts from Wikipedia. Also the sources should be mentioned in a more detailed way, sometimes you only mention article title and journal title, without year, issue etc. Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] 21:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)		The version I got by email looks good to me. However, there are some similarities and even taken over parts from Wikipedia. Also the sources should be mentioned in a more detailed way, sometimes you only mention article title and journal title, without year, issue etc. Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] 21:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
		+	I liked your presentation. You seemed to answer in ways that he would have.[[User:Pips\|Pips]] 22:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 6 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Looked like you went well into depth in your presentation, and I assume that your paper will be equally as brilliant. --[[User:Foot\|Foot]] 06:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)		Looked like you went well into depth in your presentation, and I assume that your paper will be equally as brilliant. --[[User:Foot\|Foot]] 06:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	The version I got by email looks good to me. However, there are some similarities and even taken over parts from Wikipedia. Also the sources should be mentioned in a more detailed way, sometimes you only mention article title and journal title, without year, issue etc. Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] 21:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)