Talk:Lu Xun (1881-1936) - Revision history

Mark at 06:57, 10 June 2016

2016-06-10T06:57:01Z

Mark at 06:56, 10 June 2016

2016-06-10T06:56:02Z

Mark at 06:55, 10 June 2016

2016-06-10T06:55:05Z

Mark at 06:53, 10 June 2016

2016-06-10T06:53:59Z

Mark: /* Very Detaied but with a little mistake */ new section

2016-06-10T06:53:12Z

Very Detaied but with a little mistake: new section

Root at 11:46, 23 October 2012

2012-10-23T11:46:48Z

Dekeo at 19:56, 12 October 2012

2012-10-12T19:56:04Z

Dekeo at 19:39, 12 October 2012

2012-10-12T19:39:11Z

Foot at 20:02, 10 October 2012

2012-10-10T20:02:40Z

Pips at 17:34, 9 October 2012

2012-10-09T17:34:09Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Well done, very concise. [[User:Pips|Pips]] 17:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
@@ Line 20: / Line 17: @@
 * I appreciate very much that you still extended your paper after Mingemperor's comment that it should contain more own commentary. [[User:Root|Root]] 11:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
-It's very detaied but has a little mistake.
+It's very Detaied but has a little mistake.
-In the first part concerning Lu Xun's youth, you mentioned that"In his youth, Lu Xun lived comfortably in Peking (Beijing) with his family, including his grandfather [a high ranking government official]",however, it isn't right as we know Lu Xun was born and lived in Zhejiang Province, which is far away from Beijing.
+In the first part concerning Lu Xun's youth, you mentioned that"In his youth, Lu Xun lived comfortably in Peking (Beijing) with his family, including his grandfather [a high ranking government official]",however, it isn't right as we know Lu Xun was born and lived in Zhejiang Province, which is far away from Beijing.--[[User:Mark|Mark]] ([[User talk:Mark|talk]]) 06:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:56, 10 June 2016
Line 19:		Line 19:
	* The pen name hint is a good one, you may add more here too.		* The pen name hint is a good one, you may add more here too.
	* I appreciate very much that you still extended your paper after Mingemperor's comment that it should contain more own commentary. [[User:Root\|Root]] 11:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)		* I appreciate very much that you still extended your paper after Mingemperor's comment that it should contain more own commentary. [[User:Root\|Root]] 11:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	It's very detaied but has a little mistake.
		+	In the first part concerning Lu Xun's youth, you mentioned that"In his youth, Lu Xun lived comfortably in Peking (Beijing) with his family, including his grandfather [a high ranking government official]",however, it isn't right as we know Lu Xun was born and lived in Zhejiang Province, which is far away from Beijing.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 10 June 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	It's very Detaied but has a little mistake.
		+	In the first part concerning Lu Xun's youth, you mentioned that"In his youth, Lu Xun lived comfortably in Peking (Beijing) with his family, including his grandfather [a high ranking government official]",however, it isn't right as we know Lu Xun was born and lived in Zhejiang Province, which is far away from Beijing.
		+
	Well done, very concise. [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 17:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)		Well done, very concise. [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 17:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:53, 10 June 2016
Line 16:		Line 16:
	* The pen name hint is a good one, you may add more here too.		* The pen name hint is a good one, you may add more here too.
	* I appreciate very much that you still extended your paper after Mingemperor's comment that it should contain more own commentary. [[User:Root\|Root]] 11:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)		* I appreciate very much that you still extended your paper after Mingemperor's comment that it should contain more own commentary. [[User:Root\|Root]] 11:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
−
−	~~== Very Detaied but with a little mistake ==~~
−
−	In the first part concerning Lu Xun's youth, you mentioned that"In his youth, Lu Xun lived comfortably in Peking (Beijing) with his family, including his grandfather [a high ranking government official]",however, it isn't right as we know Lu Xun was born and lived in Zhejiang Province, which is far away from Beijing.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:53, 10 June 2016
Line 16:		Line 16:
	* The pen name hint is a good one, you may add more here too.		* The pen name hint is a good one, you may add more here too.
	* I appreciate very much that you still extended your paper after Mingemperor's comment that it should contain more own commentary. [[User:Root\|Root]] 11:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)		* I appreciate very much that you still extended your paper after Mingemperor's comment that it should contain more own commentary. [[User:Root\|Root]] 11:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Very Detaied but with a little mistake ==
		+
		+	In the first part concerning Lu Xun's youth, you mentioned that"In his youth, Lu Xun lived comfortably in Peking (Beijing) with his family, including his grandfather [a high ranking government official]",however, it isn't right as we know Lu Xun was born and lived in Zhejiang Province, which is far away from Beijing.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:46, 23 October 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Nice introduction to an influential writer that we, in the U.S. ought to know more about. You mention "many pen names" but don't list any of them. It might help someone who would like to find some of his works.[[User:Dekeo\|Dekeo]] 19:56, 12 October 2012 (UTC)		Nice introduction to an influential writer that we, in the U.S. ought to know more about. You mention "many pen names" but don't list any of them. It might help someone who would like to find some of his works.[[User:Dekeo\|Dekeo]] 19:56, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	Dear Maranda, looks really great for your first Wiki article. However, you might want to consider the following for your next paper:
		+	* It can still be a little bit more elaborated.
		+	* Lu Xun's main topic in life was "doubt". Maybe you can add something about this
		+	* The pen name hint is a good one, you may add more here too.
		+	* I appreciate very much that you still extended your paper after Mingemperor's comment that it should contain more own commentary. [[User:Root\|Root]] 11:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 12 October 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Too Short. We need deeper information on the best Chinese writer ever. Otherwise, well done. --[[User:Foot\|Foot]] 20:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC)		Too Short. We need deeper information on the best Chinese writer ever. Otherwise, well done. --[[User:Foot\|Foot]] 20:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

−	~~== Childhood ==~~ I though this presentation needed more preparation. I would have like to know more about the author. Reddragon.	+	I though this presentation needed more preparation. I would have like to know more about the author. Reddragon.
		+
		+	Nice introduction to an influential writer that we, in the U.S. ought to know more about. You mention "many pen names" but don't list any of them. It might help someone who would like to find some of his works.[[User:Dekeo\|Dekeo]] 19:56, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 12 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−
	Well done, very concise. [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 17:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)		Well done, very concise. [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 17:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Line 7:		Line 6:

	Too Short. We need deeper information on the best Chinese writer ever. Otherwise, well done. --[[User:Foot\|Foot]] 20:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC)		Too Short. We need deeper information on the best Chinese writer ever. Otherwise, well done. --[[User:Foot\|Foot]] 20:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Childhood == I though this presentation needed more preparation. I would have like to know more about the author. Reddragon.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 10 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~This article is a stub! [[User:Root\|Root]] 21:13, 11 September 2012 (UTC)~~

	Well done, very concise. [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 17:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)		Well done, very concise. [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 17:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Line 6:		Line 5:

	Not bad, formatting looks ok, but did it meet all the requirements? Mr. Woesler said he wanted more commentary and not just "the facts." [[User:Mingemperor\|Mingemperor]] 17:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC)		Not bad, formatting looks ok, but did it meet all the requirements? Mr. Woesler said he wanted more commentary and not just "the facts." [[User:Mingemperor\|Mingemperor]] 17:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	Too Short. We need deeper information on the best Chinese writer ever. Otherwise, well done. --[[User:Foot\|Foot]] 20:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This article is a stub! [[User:Root|Root]] 21:13, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 It looks really good! Great format and images! [[User:Ellafitzgerald|Ellafitzgerald]] 05:30, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 Not bad, formatting looks ok, but did it meet all the requirements? Mr. Woesler said he wanted more commentary and not just "the facts." [[User:Mingemperor|Mingemperor]] 17:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC)