Talk:The 5 Canonized Classics - Revision history

Root at 22:26, 4 March 2013

2013-03-04T22:26:40Z

Ignatius J Reilly: /* New comments in 2013 */

2013-03-01T20:50:27Z

New comments in 2013

Jenny R: /* New comments in 2013 */

2013-03-01T20:48:25Z

New comments in 2013

Joshua B. at 18:21, 1 March 2013

2013-03-01T18:21:55Z

Samantha S at 22:14, 28 February 2013

2013-02-28T22:14:32Z

TaraDFroisland: /* New comments in 2013 */

2013-02-27T23:58:30Z

New comments in 2013

A Nonny Mouse: /* New comments in 2013 */

2013-02-27T23:18:48Z

New comments in 2013

Root at 12:42, 25 February 2013

2013-02-25T12:42:56Z

Root at 12:42, 25 February 2013

2013-02-25T12:42:34Z

Meh at 06:45, 19 April 2012

2012-04-19T06:45:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 4 March 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Dear Kami, please start by uploading your powerpoint presentation and then revise the existing article. Now it is still too short. The final version should be 7 pages. You need not only to describe things, but also switch to the commentator role (maybe indicated by "Contemporary Commentator" and then evaluate and discuss the topic from different angles, put it into context, criticize etc.). If you want to write less, you can integrate more pictures. Please make sure to indicate your source after each sentence or, if there is a whole paragraph with the same source, after each paragraph. You can indicate it like "Smith 2009:345" and in the final section "References" write the long version "Smith, Jared, Confucius revisted, Yale University Press 2009, 415 pp." In the edit mode, section headers are indicated with "=" and sub section headers with "==". In the edit mode, paragraphs need to be marked with 2 line feeds ("Enter" key). 1 Line feed will not show up as a paragraph. For additional editing tips, including how to indicate sources and how to find copyright free pictures, please refer to [http://wiki.vm.rub.de/uvu/index.php/uvu:Community_Portal]. Good luck with your composition! Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] ([[User talk:Root\|talk]]) 13:42, 25 February 2013 (CET)		Dear Kami, please start by uploading your powerpoint presentation and then revise the existing article. Now it is still too short. The final version should be 7 pages. You need not only to describe things, but also switch to the commentator role (maybe indicated by "Contemporary Commentator" and then evaluate and discuss the topic from different angles, put it into context, criticize etc.). If you want to write less, you can integrate more pictures. Please make sure to indicate your source after each sentence or, if there is a whole paragraph with the same source, after each paragraph. You can indicate it like "Smith 2009:345" and in the final section "References" write the long version "Smith, Jared, Confucius revisted, Yale University Press 2009, 415 pp." In the edit mode, section headers are indicated with "=" and sub section headers with "==". In the edit mode, paragraphs need to be marked with 2 line feeds ("Enter" key). 1 Line feed will not show up as a paragraph. For additional editing tips, including how to indicate sources and how to find copyright free pictures, please refer to [http://wiki.vm.rub.de/uvu/index.php/uvu:Community_Portal]. Good luck with your composition! Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] ([[User talk:Root\|talk]]) 13:42, 25 February 2013 (CET)
		+	:Dear Kami, Looks almost perfect. There are hardly things to improve any more. Maybe you can be a little bit more detailed and consistent with the references, sometimes you have numbers, sometimes last name and sometimes last name and page numbers. Also, the license of the images could be mentioned more, if the information is available (creative commons, public domain etc.). It is a little bit descriptive, you could have compared the classics or talk more about their impact. Overall a good article. [[User:Root\|Root]] ([[User talk:Root\|talk]]) 23:26, 4 March 2013 (CET)

	Kami, It looks pretty great and has a lot of information, but I would suggest that instead of displaying all of your information in bullet points maybe you should write a more in depth section with more detail and information in more of an informational essay kind of way. Everything else seems pretty good and I like it. [[User:A Nonny Mouse\|A Nonny Mouse]] ([[User talk:A Nonny Mouse\|talk]])		Kami, It looks pretty great and has a lot of information, but I would suggest that instead of displaying all of your information in bullet points maybe you should write a more in depth section with more detail and information in more of an informational essay kind of way. Everything else seems pretty good and I like it. [[User:A Nonny Mouse\|A Nonny Mouse]] ([[User talk:A Nonny Mouse\|talk]])

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 Kami, I really enjoyed the wiki page. A lot of great details and information.  My only suggestion would be if possible a few more visual aides.  My mind is weird and I learn, remember, and retain things better with visuals.  Otherwise, Great Job! --[[User:Joshua B.|Joshua B.]] ([[User talk:Joshua B.|talk]]) 19:21, 1 March 2013 (CET)
-Kami, Looks pretty good. I just wonder about the addition of the long poems and if it really counts toward your 7 pages. (I was told on my page that the poetry didn't really count as part of my wiki/project because the words were not my own?) [[User:Ignatius J. Reilly|Ignatius J. Reilly]]
+Kami, Looks pretty good. I just wonder about the addition of the long poems and if it really counts toward your 7 pages. (I was told on my page that the poetry didn't really count as part of my wiki/project because the words were not my own?) [[User:Ignatius J Reilly|Ignatius J Reilly]] ([[User talk:Ignatius J Reilly|talk]]) 21:50, 1 March 2013 (CET)
 =Old comments=

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:48, 1 March 2013
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Kami, I really enjoyed the wiki page. A lot of great details and information. My only suggestion would be if possible a few more visual aides. My mind is weird and I learn, remember, and retain things better with visuals. Otherwise, Great Job! --[[User:Joshua B.\|Joshua B.]] ([[User talk:Joshua B.\|talk]]) 19:21, 1 March 2013 (CET)		Kami, I really enjoyed the wiki page. A lot of great details and information. My only suggestion would be if possible a few more visual aides. My mind is weird and I learn, remember, and retain things better with visuals. Otherwise, Great Job! --[[User:Joshua B.\|Joshua B.]] ([[User talk:Joshua B.\|talk]]) 19:21, 1 March 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	Kami, Looks pretty good. I just wonder about the addition of the long poems and if it really counts toward your 7 pages. (I was told on my page that the poetry didn't really count as part of my wiki/project because the words were not my own?) [[User:Ignatius J. Reilly\|Ignatius J. Reilly]]

	=Old comments=		=Old comments=

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 1 March 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Kami, You have a lot of great stuff going on in this article. I would suggest adding more pictures and expanding some of the information as A Nonny Mouse suggested. You also have a broken link where a picture should be I think. If you need help fixing it, let me know and I can help a bit. (You can ask me in class tomorrow if you want.) You could also expand the section on how Confucius relates to the classics as I know that the professor really placed emphasis on that point. --[[User:TaraDFroisland\|MerchantThief]] ([[User talk:TaraDFroisland\|talk]]) 00:58, 28 February 2013 (CET) (Tara)		Kami, You have a lot of great stuff going on in this article. I would suggest adding more pictures and expanding some of the information as A Nonny Mouse suggested. You also have a broken link where a picture should be I think. If you need help fixing it, let me know and I can help a bit. (You can ask me in class tomorrow if you want.) You could also expand the section on how Confucius relates to the classics as I know that the professor really placed emphasis on that point. --[[User:TaraDFroisland\|MerchantThief]] ([[User talk:TaraDFroisland\|talk]]) 00:58, 28 February 2013 (CET) (Tara)
		+
		+	Kami, I really enjoyed the wiki page. A lot of great details and information. My only suggestion would be if possible a few more visual aides. My mind is weird and I learn, remember, and retain things better with visuals. Otherwise, Great Job! --[[User:Joshua B.\|Joshua B.]] ([[User talk:Joshua B.\|talk]]) 19:21, 1 March 2013 (CET)

	=Old comments=		=Old comments=

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 28 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=New comments in 2013=		=New comments in 2013=
		+	Kami! I liked the page but I found that it became redundant with all of the bullet points. I don't really know how to use this site very well but if there are other options of different sized bullet points for your sub points I would suggest using them so they are not all the same. Also I would suggest putting in some narrative to bring it to life a bit more. It might be hard because you are not doing an article on a particular person, but I think it would be beneficial to the reader and anyone who would come acorss the page. Also the narrative would add a variety of different ways you are presenting the information and make it less redundant. [[User:Samantha S\|Samantha S]] ([[User talk:Samantha S\|talk]]) 23:14, 28 February 2013 (CET)
		+
	Dear Kami, please start by uploading your powerpoint presentation and then revise the existing article. Now it is still too short. The final version should be 7 pages. You need not only to describe things, but also switch to the commentator role (maybe indicated by "Contemporary Commentator" and then evaluate and discuss the topic from different angles, put it into context, criticize etc.). If you want to write less, you can integrate more pictures. Please make sure to indicate your source after each sentence or, if there is a whole paragraph with the same source, after each paragraph. You can indicate it like "Smith 2009:345" and in the final section "References" write the long version "Smith, Jared, Confucius revisted, Yale University Press 2009, 415 pp." In the edit mode, section headers are indicated with "=" and sub section headers with "==". In the edit mode, paragraphs need to be marked with 2 line feeds ("Enter" key). 1 Line feed will not show up as a paragraph. For additional editing tips, including how to indicate sources and how to find copyright free pictures, please refer to [http://wiki.vm.rub.de/uvu/index.php/uvu:Community_Portal]. Good luck with your composition! Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] ([[User talk:Root\|talk]]) 13:42, 25 February 2013 (CET)		Dear Kami, please start by uploading your powerpoint presentation and then revise the existing article. Now it is still too short. The final version should be 7 pages. You need not only to describe things, but also switch to the commentator role (maybe indicated by "Contemporary Commentator" and then evaluate and discuss the topic from different angles, put it into context, criticize etc.). If you want to write less, you can integrate more pictures. Please make sure to indicate your source after each sentence or, if there is a whole paragraph with the same source, after each paragraph. You can indicate it like "Smith 2009:345" and in the final section "References" write the long version "Smith, Jared, Confucius revisted, Yale University Press 2009, 415 pp." In the edit mode, section headers are indicated with "=" and sub section headers with "==". In the edit mode, paragraphs need to be marked with 2 line feeds ("Enter" key). 1 Line feed will not show up as a paragraph. For additional editing tips, including how to indicate sources and how to find copyright free pictures, please refer to [http://wiki.vm.rub.de/uvu/index.php/uvu:Community_Portal]. Good luck with your composition! Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] ([[User talk:Root\|talk]]) 13:42, 25 February 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:58, 27 February 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Kami, It looks pretty great and has a lot of information, but I would suggest that instead of displaying all of your information in bullet points maybe you should write a more in depth section with more detail and information in more of an informational essay kind of way. Everything else seems pretty good and I like it. [[User:A Nonny Mouse\|A Nonny Mouse]] ([[User talk:A Nonny Mouse\|talk]])		Kami, It looks pretty great and has a lot of information, but I would suggest that instead of displaying all of your information in bullet points maybe you should write a more in depth section with more detail and information in more of an informational essay kind of way. Everything else seems pretty good and I like it. [[User:A Nonny Mouse\|A Nonny Mouse]] ([[User talk:A Nonny Mouse\|talk]])
		+
		+	Kami, You have a lot of great stuff going on in this article. I would suggest adding more pictures and expanding some of the information as A Nonny Mouse suggested. You also have a broken link where a picture should be I think. If you need help fixing it, let me know and I can help a bit. (You can ask me in class tomorrow if you want.) You could also expand the section on how Confucius relates to the classics as I know that the professor really placed emphasis on that point. --[[User:TaraDFroisland\|MerchantThief]] ([[User talk:TaraDFroisland\|talk]]) 00:58, 28 February 2013 (CET) (Tara)

	=Old comments=		=Old comments=

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =New comments in 2013=
 Dear Kami, please start by uploading your powerpoint presentation and then revise the existing article. Now it is still too short. The final version should be 7 pages. You need not only to describe things, but also switch to the commentator role (maybe indicated by "Contemporary Commentator" and then evaluate and discuss the topic from different angles, put it into context, criticize etc.). If you want to write less, you can integrate more pictures. Please make sure to indicate your source after each sentence or, if there is a whole paragraph with the same source, after each paragraph. You can indicate it like "Smith 2009:345" and in the final section "References" write the long version "Smith, Jared, Confucius revisted, Yale University Press 2009, 415 pp." In the edit mode, section headers are indicated with "=" and sub section headers with "==". In the edit mode, paragraphs need to be marked with 2 line feeds ("Enter" key). 1 Line feed will not show up as a paragraph. For additional editing tips, including how to indicate sources and how to find copyright free pictures, please refer to [http://wiki.vm.rub.de/uvu/index.php/uvu:Community_Portal]. Good luck with your composition! Best, [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 13:42, 25 February 2013 (CET)
 =Old comments=

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 25 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	=New comments in 2013=
		+	Dear Kami, please start by uploading your powerpoint presentation and then revise the existing article. Now it is still too short. The final version should be 7 pages. You need to stick to the 1st person narrative ("I", "me" etc.) and not only describe things, but also switch to the commentator role (maybe indicated by "Contemporary Commentator" and then evaluate and discuss the topic from different angles, put it into context, criticize etc.). If you want to write less, you can integrate more pictures. Please make sure to indicate your source after each sentence or, if there is a whole paragraph with the same source, after each paragraph. You can indicate it like "Smith 2009:345" and in the final section "References" write the long version "Smith, Jared, Confucius revisted, Yale University Press 2009, 415 pp." In the edit mode, section headers are indicated with "=" and sub section headers with "==". In the edit mode, paragraphs need to be marked with 2 line feeds ("Enter" key). 1 Line feed will not show up as a paragraph. For additional editing tips, including how to indicate sources and how to find copyright free pictures, please refer to [http://wiki.vm.rub.de/uvu/index.php/uvu:Community_Portal]. Good luck with your composition! Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] ([[User talk:Root\|talk]]) 13:42, 25 February 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	=Old comments=
	Dear Arnold, that looks really good to me. Please still indicate the sources. You can look at the other articles for how to do it. Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] 05:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)		Dear Arnold, that looks really good to me. Please still indicate the sources. You can look at the other articles for how to do it. Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] 05:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:45, 19 April 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:

	==Comment 2==		==Comment 2==
−	No one adds pictures anymore???? --[[User:Meh\|Meh]] 06:44, 19 April 2012 (UTC)	+	No one adds pictures anymore???? There may exist some pictures of the stuff in calligraphy... --[[User:Meh\|Meh]] 06:44, 19 April 2012 (UTC)