Talk:Zhang Ailing - Revision history

Paperman at 16:02, 10 June 2016

2016-06-10T16:02:20Z

2012-10-23T12:14:35Z

2012-10-23T12:13:00Z

2012-10-12T21:20:44Z

2012-10-10T12:42:27Z

2012-10-10T04:33:04Z

2012-10-09T21:04:59Z

2012-10-09T21:03:49Z

2012-10-09T05:34:15Z

Created page with 'That first line is looking kind of funky... ~~~~'

New page

That first line is looking kind of funky... [[User:Ellafitzgerald|Ellafitzgerald]] 05:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 10 June 2016
Line 17:		Line 17:
	* Indicate sources for each paragraph of the text (or no source, if your own work)		* Indicate sources for each paragraph of the text (or no source, if your own work)
	Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] 12:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)		Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] 12:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	The best page I have seen in this web.It's elaborated and well-organized.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 Dear Corinne, looks good to me, good pictures, text is also good structured and written. There is still room for improvement:
 * Indicate sources for photos (especially license, see [[Gong Li]])
 * Indicate sources for each paragraph of the text (or no source, if your own work)
 Best, [[User:Root|Root]] 12:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 23 October 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I loved the article. Perhaps a few more sources would help to flesh it out a bit more. For example, was there no controversy about her? Great job of citing your sources within the body of the article. A suggestion- you should probably cut "reddragon"'s comment out and copy it on to this page- right now, it looks like a weird start to your article. [[User:Dekeo\|Dekeo]] 21:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)		I loved the article. Perhaps a few more sources would help to flesh it out a bit more. For example, was there no controversy about her? Great job of citing your sources within the body of the article. A suggestion- you should probably cut "reddragon"'s comment out and copy it on to this page- right now, it looks like a weird start to your article. [[User:Dekeo\|Dekeo]] 21:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	I enjoyed this presentation. I though it was well done. I would have liked to see more of your opinion in the wiky and maybe one picture. Reddragon.
		+
		+	Dear Corinne, looks good to me, good pictures, text is also good structured and written. There is still room for improvement:
		+	* Indicate sources for photos (especially license, see [[Gong Li]])
		+	* Indicate sources for each paragraph of the text (or no source, if your own work)
		+	Best, [[User:Root\|Root]] 12:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 12 October 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Thanks Matt!		Thanks Matt!
		+
		+	I loved the article. Perhaps a few more sources would help to flesh it out a bit more. For example, was there no controversy about her? Great job of citing your sources within the body of the article. A suggestion- you should probably cut "reddragon"'s comment out and copy it on to this page- right now, it looks like a weird start to your article. [[User:Dekeo\|Dekeo]] 21:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 10 October 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Your layout was looking a little strange, so I took the liberty to change it for you.[[User:Mattstrock\|Mattstrock]] 04:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC)		Your layout was looking a little strange, so I took the liberty to change it for you.[[User:Mattstrock\|Mattstrock]] 04:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	Thanks Matt!

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:33, 10 October 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	This looks great! [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 21:04, 9 October 2012 (UTC)		This looks great! [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 21:04, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	Your layout was looking a little strange, so I took the liberty to change it for you.[[User:Mattstrock\|Mattstrock]] 04:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 9 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	That first line is looking kind of funky... [[User:Ellafitzgerald\|Ellafitzgerald]] 05:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)		That first line is looking kind of funky... [[User:Ellafitzgerald\|Ellafitzgerald]] 05:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

−	This looks great! [[~~Special~~:~~Contributions/161.28.86.47~~\|~~161.28.86.47~~]] 21:03, 9 October 2012 (UTC)	+	This looks great! [[User:Pips\|Pips]] 21:04, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 9 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	That first line is looking kind of funky... [[User:Ellafitzgerald\|Ellafitzgerald]] 05:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)		That first line is looking kind of funky... [[User:Ellafitzgerald\|Ellafitzgerald]] 05:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	This looks great! [[Special:Contributions/161.28.86.47\|161.28.86.47]] 21:03, 9 October 2012 (UTC)