Difference between revisions of "Talk:Han Han"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The version I got by email looks good to me. However, there are some similarities and even taken over parts from Wikipedia. Also the sources should be mentioned in a more detailed way, sometimes you only mention article title and journal title, without year, issue etc. Best, [[User:Root|Root]] 21:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | The version I got by email looks good to me. However, there are some similarities and even taken over parts from Wikipedia. Also the sources should be mentioned in a more detailed way, sometimes you only mention article title and journal title, without year, issue etc. Best, [[User:Root|Root]] 21:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | I liked your presentation. You seemed to answer in ways that he would have.[[User:Pips|Pips]] 22:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:29, 7 December 2012
Looked like you went well into depth in your presentation, and I assume that your paper will be equally as brilliant. --Foot 06:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
The version I got by email looks good to me. However, there are some similarities and even taken over parts from Wikipedia. Also the sources should be mentioned in a more detailed way, sometimes you only mention article title and journal title, without year, issue etc. Best, Root 21:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC) I liked your presentation. You seemed to answer in ways that he would have.Pips 22:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC)