Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ba Jin"
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I was wondering if people today still see Ba Jin as a traitor or they have changed their mind. I did enjoyed they way you wrote this paper, thanks. Reddragon [[User:Reddragon|Reddragon]] 07:02, 5 December 2012 (UTC) | I was wondering if people today still see Ba Jin as a traitor or they have changed their mind. I did enjoyed they way you wrote this paper, thanks. Reddragon [[User:Reddragon|Reddragon]] 07:02, 5 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Not bad, but you could still cite your sources better. And I agree with them, it could use more pictures than just the one portrait of him. [[User:Mingemperor|Mingemperor]] 08:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | It looks great! I' m curious as to the what people think now of what he wrote.[[User:Pips|Pips]] 22:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Very good, you really tried to describe the real Ba Jin. Sources mentioned at the end of the paragraphs. Thanks that you later still uploaded your ppt. [[User:Root|Root]] 22:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The citation and citing of sources was way better then mine. The views seemed like they could say more of your own opinion. [[User:Random1|Random1]] 00:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:26, 7 December 2012
Looks great, could use some more pictures though. Pips 04:16, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Love the length of this paper and the depth. I agree with the pictures, but I understand because I couldnt find sufficient pictures to use myself. Overall a good paper.--Foot 06:57, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
I was wondering if people today still see Ba Jin as a traitor or they have changed their mind. I did enjoyed they way you wrote this paper, thanks. Reddragon Reddragon 07:02, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Not bad, but you could still cite your sources better. And I agree with them, it could use more pictures than just the one portrait of him. Mingemperor 08:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC) It looks great! I' m curious as to the what people think now of what he wrote.Pips 22:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Very good, you really tried to describe the real Ba Jin. Sources mentioned at the end of the paragraphs. Thanks that you later still uploaded your ppt. Root 22:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
The citation and citing of sources was way better then mine. The views seemed like they could say more of your own opinion. Random1 00:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)