Difference between revisions of "Talk:Han Dynasty"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Root moved page Talk:Overview of the Han Dynasty to Talk:Han Dynasty) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | :I like the descriptions about each of the emperors. It could maybe be a little longer, maybe a little bit more about them? [[User:Leo1299|Leo1299]] ([[User talk:Leo1299|talk]]) 02:42, 1 March 2013 (CET) | |
| + | |||
| + | :Dear Raleigh, This is a good approach, and you have collected a lot of information and images. I fixed a few images for you, where you had forgotten to mention the file extension "jpg" and converted one picture from "gif" to "jpg" for you, since Wiki does not accept gif files. The sources quoted are not quotable, en.Wikipedia.org is not considered a reliable source, but you can use it to get an overview and a start. Also the images are not quoted correctly with reference to their sources and licenses. I have also corrected some formatting errors. The article should not be called "Overview of the Han Dynasty" but "Han Dynasty" and you would not call it "glorious" without context. The text in total is still not 7 pages also you used a lot of images. [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 17:56, 4 March 2013 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 18:56, 4 March 2013
- I like the descriptions about each of the emperors. It could maybe be a little longer, maybe a little bit more about them? Leo1299 (talk) 02:42, 1 March 2013 (CET)
- Dear Raleigh, This is a good approach, and you have collected a lot of information and images. I fixed a few images for you, where you had forgotten to mention the file extension "jpg" and converted one picture from "gif" to "jpg" for you, since Wiki does not accept gif files. The sources quoted are not quotable, en.Wikipedia.org is not considered a reliable source, but you can use it to get an overview and a start. Also the images are not quoted correctly with reference to their sources and licenses. I have also corrected some formatting errors. The article should not be called "Overview of the Han Dynasty" but "Han Dynasty" and you would not call it "glorious" without context. The text in total is still not 7 pages also you used a lot of images. Root (talk) 17:56, 4 March 2013 (CET)