Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zhu Xi and Neo-Confucianism"
(Created page with "This looks really great. Nice use of graphics. ~~~~") |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This looks really great. Nice use of graphics. [[User:Ignatius J Reilly|Ignatius J Reilly]] ([[User talk:Ignatius J Reilly|talk]]) 02:36, 16 April 2013 (CEST) | This looks really great. Nice use of graphics. [[User:Ignatius J Reilly|Ignatius J Reilly]] ([[User talk:Ignatius J Reilly|talk]]) 02:36, 16 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I really enjoyed the article. I thought that the commentary and the critique sections were appropriate for the sections. I would have liked to read more commentary on the other sections as well. [[User:Samantha S|Samantha S]] ([[User talk:Samantha S|talk]]) 05:26, 17 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Looks good; I see you've added more since yesterday, as well. I think the section on calligraphy is a nice touch. --[[User: Cappuccino talk:Cappuccino Cappuccino|Cappuccino]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | I like your formatting and such. I suppose my only suggestion could possibly be to expand the about me section, but even then its not really needed.--[[User:TaraDFroisland|MerchantThief]] ([[User talk:TaraDFroisland|talk]]) 07:21, 16 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I really enjoyed the article. I thought your use of pictures really brought to life the page. I helped me with a better understanding. Only suggestion would be to lengthen the About me section if possible. Overall Great job--[[User:Joshua B.|Joshua B.]] ([[User talk:Joshua B.|talk]]) 22:13, 16 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dear Kami, please still upload your ppt. And for your next article, you may want to add the page numbers for your references in the text. Overall it reads good. Thanks! Best,--[[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 03:52, 22 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:52, 22 April 2013
This looks really great. Nice use of graphics. Ignatius J Reilly (talk) 02:36, 16 April 2013 (CEST)
I really enjoyed the article. I thought that the commentary and the critique sections were appropriate for the sections. I would have liked to read more commentary on the other sections as well. Samantha S (talk) 05:26, 17 April 2013 (CEST)
Looks good; I see you've added more since yesterday, as well. I think the section on calligraphy is a nice touch. --Cappuccino
I like your formatting and such. I suppose my only suggestion could possibly be to expand the about me section, but even then its not really needed.--MerchantThief (talk) 07:21, 16 April 2013 (CEST)
I really enjoyed the article. I thought your use of pictures really brought to life the page. I helped me with a better understanding. Only suggestion would be to lengthen the About me section if possible. Overall Great job--Joshua B. (talk) 22:13, 16 April 2013 (CEST)
Dear Kami, please still upload your ppt. And for your next article, you may want to add the page numbers for your references in the text. Overall it reads good. Thanks! Best,--Root (talk) 03:52, 22 April 2013 (CEST)