Theor App Lit EN 1

Quicklink back to the overview page Overview Page of Translation Theories Applied to Literary Translations

Chapter Theor_App_Lit_EN_1

1 周巧: A Case Study on Chinese Translations of Toni Morrison’s Novel Beloved Based on Catford’s Translation Shifts Theory

摘要

长篇小说宠儿是美国当代黑人女作家托妮·莫里森独具特色的一部作品。因为这部小说的语言具有黑人英语的典型特征，且塑造的黑人形象非常丰满独特。因此本文以美国著名非裔女作家托妮的《宠儿》的汉译本为语料，从卡特福德翻译转化理论的角度分析宠儿的翻译策略和特点，从而更加了解该作品中爱与自我的主题，也更理解奴隶制下美国黑人的生活状态。

翻译转换理论是翻译学家卡特福德站在语言学的角度解释翻译过程中是从源语到目标语出现形式偏离现象的理论。根据该理论，翻译转换包括两种：一为层次转换，一为范畴转换。其中，层次转换包含两类：（1）数的转换及（2）时态和体的转换；而范畴转换则包含四大类：（1）类别转换、（2）单位转换、（3）结构转换及（4）系统内部转换。以美国非裔小说家托妮.莫里森的小说《宠儿》为例，从词汇、句法方面分析其语料特点，结合卡特福德翻译转换理论探讨在文学翻译过程中采取的转换策略与方法，并分析该理论在文学翻译中的可行性。

关键词

翻译转换理论；《宠儿》；黑人英语

Abstract

Beloved is a unique novel of Toni Morrison, who is a contemporary African American female writer. Because the language of this novel has the typical characteristics of black English, and the black characters in this novel are very rich and unique. Therefore, based on the Chinese translation of the Beloved of Toni Morrison, a famous African American female writer, this paper analyzes the translation strategies and characteristics of Beloved from the perspective of Catford's Translation Shifts Theory, so as to better understand the theme of love and self in the work and the living conditions of black Americans under slavery.

Translation Shifts Theory is a theory that translator Catford explains the phenomenon of formal deviation from the source language to the target language in the process of translation from the perspective of linguistics. According to the theory, Translation Shifts fall into two categories: Level Shifts and Category Shifts. In terms of Level Shifts, it includes the transformation of number, tense and aspect. Category Shifts cover four aspects: (1) Class Shifts, (2) Unit Shifts, (3) Structure Shifts and (4) Intra-system Shifts. Taking Beloved as an example, this paper analyzes the characteristics of its corpus from the aspects of vocabulary and syntax, and discusses the shift strategies and methods in the process of literary translation combined with Catford's Translation Shifts Theory, thus analyzing its feasibility in the literary translation.

Key words

Translation Shift Theory; Beloved; Black English

Introduction

The selected text of the translation study is a literary novel written by the African American writer Toni Morrison, which was named Beloved with the themes of love and self. It mainly talks about Seth, a female slave, who was chased on the way to escape with her daughter. Because she didn't want to see her child become a slave again, she resolutely strangled her young daughter. Eighteen years later, slavery had long been abolished, and the baby girl she killed came back to punish her mother's behavior day and night. This book is full of vivid characters, richly detailed descriptions and passionate emotions. The most important feature of the book is there is a range of slang in Afro-American English, which shows language features and reflects characters’ images.(Pan Yue & Lei Ge. 1996:3-342)

In order to have a better understanding of Beloved and Translation Shifts Theory, the author study the Chinese translation of Beloved from the perspective of Catford’s Translation Shifts Theory. The appearance of Catford’s Translation Shift theory can be traced back to 1950s. Instead of talking about formal equivalence, Catford’s theory stresses meaning transmission. It is the typical reflection of the principle that form is not as important as content. The theory, devoted to two aspects, namely level shifts and category shifts, is becoming one of the most practical and influential theories in the studies about translation shifts. Correspondingly, the author writing this report will probe into the utilization of the translation shifts theory which Catford initiated, particularly, the category shifts in the studying.

In order to have a better understanding of Beloved and Translation Shifts Theory, the author studies the Chinese translation of Beloved from the perspective of Catford’s Translation Shifts Theory. The appearance of Catford’s Translation Shift theory can be traced back to 1950s. Instead of talking about formal equivalence, Catford’s theory stresses meaning transmission. It is the typical reflection of the principle that form is not as important as content. The theory, devoted to two aspects, namely level shifts and category shifts, is becoming one of the most practical and influential theories in the studies about translation shifts. Correspondingly, the author writing this report will probe into the utilization of the translation shifts theory which Catford initiated, particularly, the category shifts in the studying. --Fu Hongyan (talk) 06:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

The report is structured as follows: the first part is the introduction of information about the source text, the guidance theory of the translation work and the report outline, followed by the second part which focuses on the linguistic features of Beloved. As for the third part, there provides a theory introduction, namely, Catford’s Translation Shifts Theory which covers level shifts and category shifts. The fourth part is the case analysis of Beloved from the perspectives of this theory. Finally, the report ends with a conclusion, in which the whole report and several deficiencies are briefly reviewed.

The report is structured as following: the first part is the introduction of information about the source text, the guidance theory of the translation work and the report outline, followed by the second part which focuses on the linguistic features of Beloved. As for the third part, there provides a theory introduction, namely, Catford’s Translation Shifts Theory which covers level shifts and category shifts. The fourth part is the case analysis of Beloved from the perspectives of this theory. Finally, the report ends with a conclusion, in which the whole report and several deficiencies are briefly reviewed. --Fu Hongyan (talk) 06:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Introduction to Beloved

In this part, the author will roughly introduce the main content of the novel Beloved and analyze the linguistic features of the text , laying a solid foundation for the following steps.

Main Content

Beloved tells about a black slave named Seth who fled from a Kentucky farm to a Cincinnati farmhouse alone in order to gain freedom. A month later, she was chased by slave owners. For freeing her child from the tragic fate of being a slave, she resolutely cut her throat and buried her. The child who died miserably in the hands of his own mother was named Beloved. Because she killed her children herself, the mother has been hated and rejected by the people in the community and endured the torture of conscience and great loneliness. Beloved returned to the world 18 years later. She turned into a girl, disturbed her mother, and destroyed her mother's stable and warm life.

Based on the life of a small town in Cincinnati, Ohio in 1873, the novel shows the great spiritual crisis left by slavery to American blacks through the story of a young black woman who has been reborn and a black mother who has suffered psychological suffering. It also reveals that slavery still has a strong influence on black people after the abolishment of slavery.

Linguistic Characteristics

The selected text used for this report is the literary novel Beloved and its Chinese Translation by Pan Yue and Lei Ge. This part introduces the linguistic characteristics of the source text from lexis, syntax and discourse specifically. (Pan Yue & Lei Ge. 1996:3-342)

Language features are determined by the specific group, culture, and context. Beloved, written by an African American Writer who has a totally different writing style from normal American writers. The excerpted text has the following linguistic characteristics: In the first place, regarding lexis, many words in the novel are common, but the collocation and usage of these words are not. The words used are exaggerated and humorous, involving a large number of slang words, close to life.

Language features are determined by the specific social group, culture, and context. Beloved, written by an African American Writer who has a totally different writing style from traditional American writers. The excerpted text has the following linguistic characteristics:

In the first place, regarding lexis, many words in the novel are common, but the collocation and usage of these words are not. The words used are humorous, opposite to the common daily language, involving a large number of slang words, close to life.--Fu Hongyan (talk) 07:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Secondly, in terms of syntax, The structure is not rigorous and standard. The omission of be verbs is one of the most prominent features of black English. In addition, double negation is also a common phenomenon, which has obvious characteristics of black English sentence patterns. Finally, in terms of discourse, this book is in the form of dialogue, very colloquial and close to life, therefore the selected text is very smooth and natural. The plot of the story is complicated, twists and turns, exciting and fascinating.

More specifically, one of the most typical linguistic characteristics of this novel is black English. Black English is a kind of informal language that in novels can reveal different images and reveal the special culture of black English. Therefore, some words and phrases in this novel have their own slang meaning, making the characters rich and vivid.

More specifically, one of the most typical linguistic characteristics of this novel is Black English. Black English is a kind of informal language that in novels can reveal different images and the peculiar culture of black English. Therefore, some words and phrases in this novel have their own slang meaning, making the characters rich and vivid. --Fu Hongyan (talk) 07:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Theoretical Foundation

Translation theory guides translation practice as a whole or from a macro perspective. Some translation theories are directly connected with translation practice. In addition, the theory can also be used to guide the criticism and appreciation of the translation. Through the analysis and evaluation of the Chinese versions, we can explore the deep-seated reasons and promote the development of translation practice, which also reflects the promotion of translation theory to practice to some extent. In recent years, more and more scholars have tried to discuss the practical value of shift theory in English-Chinese translation and achieved some results. This paper attempts to use the Translation Shifts Theory to explore the guiding role of shift theory in English-Chinese translation practice through the analysis and study of beloved's translation strategies.(Catford, 1965: 85)

About Catford’s Shifts Theory

Since the 1950s, there has been a tendency for the integration of linguistic methods with translation in such aspects as translation analysis and translation phenomenon classification, based on which many concrete classification methods have been raised. The concept of transformation can be traced back to comparative stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation which was published in 1958 by two Canadian scholars: Jean Darbelnet and Jean Paul Vinay. According to them, among the seven translation techniques and two translation strategies, the "transposition" technique is the rudiment of translation transformation. In this regard, it is the basis for the theory of translation transformation. (Vinay, 1958,:46)

J. C. Catford is a famous British translation theorist. He interprets translation from the perspective of modern linguistics and defines translation as "replacing the text material of another language with that of a different language" (Catford, 1965: 10)He regards the pursuit of equivalence as the central issue of translation research and practice, and makes a descriptive study of different language levels of translation. In A Linguistic Theory of Translation published in 1965, he defined the concept of conversion as a deviation from formal correspondence during the conversion between the source and target languages. He also said that "content is more important than form" (Mu Lei, 1990,:37-42). In fact, Catford borrows the concepts of category and level that were put forward by Halliday (Halliday, 2005: 33-36), then he categorized translation shift as Level Shifts and Category Shifts, offering guidance from a different viewpoint for translation to translator. (Catford, 1965: 10), (Mu Lei, 1990:37-42), (Halliday, 2005:33-36)

Introduction to Level Shifts

According to Catford, there are four possible levels in language: (i) grammatical level, (ii) lexical level, (iii) morphological level and (iv) phonetic level. By a shift of level, we mean that a SL item at one linguistic level has a TL translation equivalent at a different level. The level shifts are embodied in the mutual transformation of grammar and vocabulary. So it can be said that a level shift would be something that can be expressed by grammar in one language and lexis in another.(Catford, 1965:74)

Introduction to Category Shifts

Category Shifts cover four aspects: (1) unit, (2) structure, (3) class and (4) intra-system. Category Shifts include translation without hierarchy and translation with hierarchy. Under the translation without hierarchy which is similar to free translation, there is a hierarchical relationship between the source language and the target language at any proper level. "It is meaningless to talk about category shift unless we assume some degree of formal correspondence between SL and TL"(Catford, 1965:23). There are four kinds of hierarchical relationships:

Structural Shifts: Structural Shifts refer to the change of language structure at the level of unified grammar in translation. According to Catford, structure shift" occurs in the phonological and graphological translation as well as in total translation", such as the change of word order, which does not go beyond the grammatical level of the sentence. (Catford, 1965:77)

Class Shifts: It occurs when “the translation equivalent of a SL item is a number of a different class from the original item”. A typical example is the change of parts of speech. Therefore, the translator could translate the English words into Chinese phrases or sentences or translate the phrases into clauses. (Catford, 1965:78)

Unit Shifts: It is also known as rank shift, which means departures from formal corresponding in which the translation equivalent of a unit at one rank in the SL is a unit at a different rank in the TL. As for ranks in English, it includes word, morpheme, phrase, sentence and clause. Hence, the shifts between these linguistic units can be called Unit Shifts. (Catford, 1965,:79)

Intra-system Shifts: this kind of transformation refers to the system in which there are basic structural forms for the source and target languages, but in translation, it is necessary to choose target words not corresponding to the source words(Catford, 1965: 80). Intra-system Shifts are used for situations where the shifts occur internally (Lin Ling，2009: 74-78，82).

Feasibility

In China, the study of translation methods and strategies has been for decades, but few basic studies have been carried out from the lexical, syntactic, and semantic levels to the specific changes or transformations in the process of translation. After consulting a large number of papers on the Internet, the author finds that literary translation practice is mostly guided by Functionalist Translation Theory, Domestication and Foreignization, Communicative Translation Theory and other theories because these theories are analyzable and can be applied to various types of texts. However, Catford's Translation Shift Theory focuses on the transformation below the sentence level, without considering the translation shift of paragraphs and texts. However, the author chooses the works of Beloved, written by African American writers. Under the background of the melting pot of culture, African American writers are faced with the difficulties of identity authentication, and the helplessness and necessity of identity reconstruction. In order to reflect this personal emotion and retain the original text as much as possible and achieve translation equivalence between the source and target languages, there must be a shift between translation because of the dramatic differences between English and Chinese. The most systematic theory of translation shift is Catford's theory. This paper capitalizes on Catford's Translation Shift Theory to make an analysis of the English Chinese translation in the novel Beloved, to verify the effectiveness of Catford's Translation Shift Theory in guiding English Chinese translation practice, and further carry forward translation practice-related research in the future. (Mao Jingjing，2015:145-146)

In China, the study of translation methods and strategies has been a long history for decades, but few basic studies have been carried out from the lexical, syntactic, and semantic levels to the specific changes or transformations in the process of translation. After consulting a large number of papers on the Internet, the author finds that literary translation practice is mostly guided by Functionalist Translation Theory, Domestication and Foreignization, Communicative Translation Theory and other theories because these theories are analyzable and can be applied to various types of texts. However, Catford's Translation Shift Theory focuses on the transformation below the sentence level, without considering the translation shift of paragraphs and texts. However, the author chooses the works of Beloved, written by African American writers. Under the background of the melting pot of culture, African American writers are faced with the difficulties of identity authentication, and the helplessness and necessity of identity reconstruction. In order to reflect this personal emotion and retain the original text as much as possible and achieve translation equivalence between the source and target languages, there must be a shift between translation because of the dramatic differences between English and Chinese. The most systematic theory of translation shift is Catford's theory. This paper capitalizes on Catford's Translation Shift Theory to make an analysis of the English Chinese translation in the novel Beloved, to verify the effectiveness of Catford's Translation Shift Theory in guiding English Chinese translation practice, and further carry forward translation practice-related research in the future. (Mao Jingjing，2015:145-146)--Fu Hongyan (talk) 07:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Catford's Translation Shift Theory is of practical value. His work is the first attempt to expound translation in a general sense. Previously, translation textbooks only touched on some empirical principles and methods. Catford describes a number of translation concepts in a systematic and detailed manner and sets objective criteria for subjective judgment of some previous concepts. Catford also illustrates why it is reasonable to realize translation transformation and equivalence, and points out that the concept of equivalence occupies a central position in translation studies. Equivalence does not mean the complete reproduction of the original language content and information, nor the blind pursuit of "formal equivalence", but "textual equivalence". His comprehensive classification of all kinds of conversions reasonably explains the actual conversions in the process of C-E and E-C translation. Therefore, Catford's Translation Shift Theory is used to analyze the grammatical, syntactic, and semantic levels in this paper.

To sum up, taking Beloved's Chinese translation as the research object, this paper analyzes the translation strategies from the perspective of level shifts and category shifts, and demonstrates the effectiveness of translation shifts theory in literary translation, so as to provide a useful reference for literary translation appreciation and practice.

The Advantage of Catford’s Translation Shifts Theory Applied in the Chinese Version

By comparing and analysis of Catford's Translation Shifts Theory, the paper is aimed to analyze the theory of translation shifts which is applied to the Chinese versions of English novels as the language material. According to the analysis of Catford's theory of translation shifts by the Chinese version, the merits of Catford's theory of translation shifts can be probed.

Level Shifts Applied in the Version

Level Shifts refer to the conversion of a source language unit at one language level into a target language unit at another language level in the process of translation. More specifically, it refers to the conversion between the grammatical level and the lexical level; in other words, one language is represented by grammar, and when translated into another language, it is represented by vocabulary and vice versa. In the process of level transformation, the exchange of lexical level and grammatical level is particularly common in English Chinese translation. Chinese is a typical analytic language, which uses word order and function words to express grammatical relations instead of inflectional changes. English, as a synthetic language, expresses such categories as number, tense, aspect and gender through grammatical means.(Catford, 1965:79)

Tense and Aspects Shifts

Example 1

ST1: As soon as two tiny hand prints appeared in the cake (that was it for Howard). Neither boy waited to see more; another kettleful of chickpeas smoking in a heap on the floor; soda crackers crumbled and strewn in a line next to the door sill.

TT1: 蛋糕里出现了两个小手印（这个则马上把霍华德逼出了家门）。两个男孩谁也没有等着往下看；又有一锅鹰嘴豆堆在地板上冒烟儿; 苏打饼干被捻成碎末，沿门槛撒成一道线。

In English, verbs have tense and aspect changes. Tenses in English include present tense, past tense, future tense. The past tense, which indicates the action or state in the past at a certain time, is usually expressed by adding the affix ed directly after the verb. In the above examples, appeared, waited and crumbled demonstrated that all actions that happened in the past. However, for Chinese, tense, plural, and mood can not be expressed through corresponding grammar. Therefore, the translator can only translate the meaning of the original text by using level shifts. Then, time-related words, such as “了”, “着”,“过”, are selected.

Example 2

ST2: Counting on the stillness of her own soul, she had forgotten the other one: the soul of her baby girl. Who would have thought that a little old baby could harbor so much rage? Rutting among the stones under the eyes of the engraver's son was not enough.

TT2: 只想着自己灵魂的安宁,她忘记了另一个灵魂:她的宝贝女儿的亡灵。谁能想到一个小小的婴儿会心怀这么多的愤懑？在石头中间,在刻字工的儿子眼皮底下与人苟合还不够。

Counting and Rutting in the above examples are a current participle with ing structure, which can also represent the current or active actions. At this time, the present participle is used as the adverbial of manner, and its logical subject is the subject in the sentence. In the above example, the present participle counting and rutting in the sentence shows that their actions happen simultaneously with the predicate. In this sentence, it is obviously unreasonable to translate the counting and rutting into “正在”, and it is more appropriate to regard it as the active actions.

Example 3

ST3: And not noticing how high the weeds had grown until the itching was all the way to her knees. Then something. The plash of water, the sight of her shoes and stockings awry on the path where she had flung them;

TT3: 直到膝盖觉得刺痒,她才留意野草已长得这么高了。然后就有了什么。也许是水花的飞溅声，被她扔在路上的鞋袜七扭八歪的样子。

The perfect tense refers to the action being in a completed state. There are three general categories of perfect tense: present, past, and future perfect tenses. The construction of the perfect tense is divided into two parts: one is the auxiliary verb（have/has/had）, the other is the past participle of a verb. In the above sentence, had grown and had flung are past perfect tenses, which refers to an action that has taken place or completed before a certain time or action in the past, focusing on the result of the event. However, in Chinese translation, there is no corresponding grammatical structure to express this tense, which can only be realized by adverbs or auxiliary words, such as "已经", "了", "过", etc.

Shifts between Plurality and Lexis

Example 4

ST4: Boys hanging from the most beautiful sycamores in the world.

TT4: 小伙子们吊死在世上最美丽的梧桐树上。

Example 5

ST5: For years each put up with the spite in his own way, but by 1873 Sethe and her daughter Denver were its only victims.

TT5: 多年以来，每个人都以各自的方式忍受着这恶意，可是到了1873年，塞丝和女儿丹芙成了它仅存的受害者。

Example 6

ST6: Nor did they wait for one of the relief periods: the weeks, months even, when nothing was disturbed.

TT6: 他们也没有再等一个间歇期，几个星期、甚至几个月的风平浪静。

Any language has the category of number, and the number can be divided into singular and plural. English is a typical singular and plural language, with obvious plural markers. Chinese nouns have no marked form but have the concept of singular and plural. Therefore, there are great differences in plural expression between English and Chinese.

There are uncountable and countable English nouns. Countable nouns can be divided into the singular and the plural. The plural is usually realized through the inflectional changes, and the rules of which are various. The general rule is to add s, es, ics, ves at the end of the word. The plural of Chinese nouns can not be expressed by the form of nouns themselves, but by other words or methods. 1) Use quantifiers to express the plural, such as "群", "次", "双" and so on.2) Add "们" after pronouns or nouns to form the plural, such as“我们”, “女士们”, “孩子们”, etc. 3) Some nouns or quantifiers can express the plural concept by reduplication. Such as “家家”, “人人”，“事事”, etc. In the above examples, when translating boys, years and weeks, the translator chooses to use the Quantifier "们" , adjectives "多" and quantifier “个” in front of the noun to express the concept of plural and convey the original meaning more correctly.

Category Shifts Applied in the Version

According to Halliday, gradations represent the five levels of language units: morphemes, words, phrases, clauses and sentences. Catford's category shifts are the free transfer between these different levels.

Catford also proposed unrestricted translation and restricted translation. The distinction between the two depends on whether there is an intention to limit the target language and the source language to specific language units. Catford's translation method of category shifts is unrestricted translation, which is suitable for most cases. Category shifts, as previously mentioned, cover structure shifts, class shifts, unit shifts, intra-system shifts.

Structure Shifts

In E-C translation, considering the factors of sentence structure and expression focus, sometimes in the process of translation, the translator needs to make corresponding structural changes, such as changing sentence structure and adjusting word order. Structural shifts are divided into (1) shifts between positive expression and negative expression; and (2) shifts between active expression and passive expression.(Maojingjing, 2015:145-146)

In E-C translation, considering the factors of sentence structure and expression focus, sometimes in the process of translation, the translator needs to make corresponding structural changes, such as changing sentence structure and adjusting word order. Structural shifts are divided into (1) shifts between positive voice and negative voice; and (2) shifts between active expression and passive expression.(Maojingjing, 2015:145-146)--Fu Hongyan (talk) 07:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC) The difference between two points is a little confusing. Maybe they both mean positive and negative voive? Or something else. It's better if proveiding a more clear explanation.

4.2.1.1 Shifts from Active Voice to Passive Voice

Example 7

ST7: Neither boy waited to see more; another kettleful of chickpeas smoking in a heap on the floor; soda crackers crumbled and strewn in a line next to the door sill. Nor did they wait for one of the relief periods: the weeks, months even, when nothing was disturbed.

TT7: 两个男孩谁也没有等着往下看:又有一锅鹰嘴豆堆在地板上冒烟儿;苏打饼干被捻成碎末，沿门槛撒成一道线。他们也没有再等一个间歇期，几个星期、甚至几个月的风平浪静。

Chinese and English share common grounds in active voice and passive voice, but the use of the voices is not the same. Due to the different characteristics of English and Chinese and the different ways of thinking of the two nations, generally speaking, English has more passive sentences than Chinese. There are two ways to translate English passive voice into Chinese. One is to translate it into Chinese with the structure of “被” or a similar structure. Besides “被”, we can also use other lexical means to express the passive voice (such as “由”, “把”，“受”，“为”, etc ). The second is to translate it into active voice or other structures, which is the most commonly used. (Lian Shuneng，1993:90)

In the sentence above, was disturbed is the obvious passive voice. Through analysis, it can be seen that the passive voice in this sentence has no subject of the agent. When translated into Chinese in passive voice, such as "没有事情被打扰", it obviously deviates from Chinese expression habits, therefore, the translator translated it into the active sentence by using sentence without a subject.

4.2.1.2 Shifts from Affirmation to Negation

Example 8

ST8: For twelve years, long before Grandma Baby died, there had been no visitors of any sort and certainly no friends.

TT8:贝比奶奶还未去世的整整十二年时间里，从没有过任何一种来访者，当然也就没有朋友。

Example 9

ST9:It had been a long time since anybody (good-willed whitewoman, preacher, speaker or newspaperman) sat at their table, their sympathetic voices called liar by the revulsion in their eyes.

TT9:好久没有什么人（好心的白女人、牧师、演说家或是报社记者——他们眼中的反感证明他们同情的声音不过是谎言）来坐在她们家的桌子旁边了。

Example 10

ST10: When he got to his house he was too tired to eat the food his sister and nephews had prepared.

TT10: 他回到家时，累得吃不下妹妹和外甥们做好的晚饭。

Due to the different social and cultural backgrounds and ways of thinking, tremendous differences exist in expressing negative meaning between English and Chinese. Both English and Chinese can express the same concept from the positive or the negative. In the process of translation, some sentences expressed from the positive can be processed into negative expressions, and the contents expressed from the negative can also be processed into positive expressions.

In the above examples, before Grandma Baby died, and It had been a long time since are affirmative expressions. If translated literally into “在贝比奶奶死之前” and “自从……，已经很久”, although it does express the original meaning, it seems lengthy and unnatural. In order to make the translation concise, clear, proper for the context, and consistent with Chinese expression habits, it is necessary to use negative expressions to replace positive expressions. This kind of translation method is very common in English Chinese translation. In addition to using negative words to express negation, they are other ways to express relatively implicit negation by using words (absence, lack, refusal, etc), phrases (free from, short of, blind to, etc), and so on. In this sense, appropriate conversion is of great importance.

4.2.1.3 Shifts from Postpositive Attributives to Prepositive Attributives

Example 10

ST10: Not only did she have to live out her years in a house palsied by the baby's fury at having its throat cut, but those ten minutes she spent pressed up against dawn-colored stone studded with star chips, her knees wide open as the grave, were longer than life, more alive, more pulsating than the baby blood that soaked her fingers like oil.

TT10:她不仅必须在那因割断喉咙的婴儿的暴怒而瘫痪的房子里度日， 而且她紧贴着缀满星斑的曙色墓石、双膝墓穴般敞开时付出的那十分钟，比生命更长，更活跃，比那油一般浸透手指的婴儿的鲜血更加脉动不息。

Under different language families, English and Chinese are different in the utilization of attributives. Chinese attributives are usually placed in front of the headword. While in English, postpositive attributives are often used. From the sentence above, it is easy to know that palsied by the baby's fury at having its throat cut, studded with star chips and that soaked her fingers like oil are post attributives to modify the former noun. Because the length of the attributive is a bit long and does not contain complex meaning, it is more appropriate to translate part of the attributive into Chinese postpositive attributive, which can also clearly express the meaning of the sentence and avoid being top-heavy.

Class Shifts

Class Shifts refer to the conversion of part of speech between the source text and the target language, which often involves the shift of nouns, adjectives, adverbs, prepositions, and verbs.

It is not difficult to find that English sentences are mostly static words, while Chinese sentences are mostly dynamic words. Therefore, class switching often needs to change the part of speech to adapt to the target language. The conversion of part of speech of English nouns can be roughly divided into two situations: one is related to the part of speech of the core word of the word; the other is that the word itself has multiple parts of speech, which should be changed according to the specific context.

4.2.2.1 Shifts of Prepositions

Example 11

ST11: "Not a house in the country ain't packed to its rafters with some dead Negro's grief. We lucky this ghost is a baby.

TT11: “在这个国家里,没有哪座房子不是从地板到房梁都塞满了黑人死鬼的悲伤。我们还算幸运，这个鬼不过是个娃娃。

Example 12

ST12: And Sethe would oblige her with anything from fabric to her own tongue. Winter in Ohio was especially rough if you had an appetite for color.

TT12: 塞丝就用一切来满足她,从布料到自己的舌头。如果你对色彩有所奢望，那么俄亥俄的冬天就尤其令人不堪忍受。

English prepositions, function words as they are, are crucial links in English lines and articles and play an extremely important role in English. Due to the lack of various prepositions in Chinese and the fact that most of them come from the grammaticalization of ancient verbs, the translation of prepositions between English and Chinese is very complicated. But the most common way is to translate prepositions into verbs. (Zhong Jingyao，2003:84-85)

In the above examples, the preposition with is frequently used in English, and its meaning is different according to the contexts. In the above example, with in both sentences can only be translated into verbs in Chinese. But because the object behind is not the same, so the collocation of verbs is not the same. The object of the first sentence is "悲伤", so it can be combined with "塞满". The object of the second sentence is "一切", so we choose the word "用".

4.2.2.2 Shifts of Adjectives

Example 13

ST13: 124 was so full of strong feeling perhaps she was oblivious to the loss of anything at all.

TT13: 时时刻刻有强烈的感情占据着124号，也许她对任何一种丧失都无动于衷了。

Example 14

ST14: My birth was and I got saved all the time. And that I shouldn't be afraid of the ghost. It wouldn't harm me because I tasted its blood when Ma'am nursed me.

TT14: 我的出生就是这样，而且后来我也总被救活。我不该怕那个鬼魂。它不会伤害我,因为太太喂我的时候我尝过它的血。

In the above sentence, full of is a fixed phrase, which is often used by native English speakers. Its meaning is easy to understand, but if translated literally into “充满了”, it is not in line with the Chinese expression habits, not authentic at all. Therefore, the translator shifts the part of speech of the word full into the Chinese verb "占据". Afraid in the second sentence is also an adjective, which can not be translated as "害怕的". It is better translated as the verb "害怕". English and Chinese are different. In translation, for the sake of fluency and accuracy, the conversion of part of speech is essential.

4.2.2.3 Shifts of Nouns

Example 15

ST15: "Not if you scared, they ain't." Garner's smile was wide. "But if you a man yourself, you'll want your niggers to be men too."

TT15:“要是你自己胆小，他们就不是了。”加纳咧开嘴笑了，“可如果你自己是个男子汉，你就希望你的黑鬼也是男子汉了。”

Example 16

ST16: Exhausted again, she sat down on the first handy place--a stump not far from the steps of 124. By then keeping her eyes open was less of an effort.

TT16: 她再一次精疲力尽，就近坐下一一 坐在离124号的台阶不远的一个树桩上。这时她睁开双眼已经不那么费劲了。

In English to Chinese translation, nouns in English are often translated into verbs in Chinese. As Wang Ziwen said, many wonderful English sentences often use nouns to express the meaning of action, but the Chinese tend to use verbs when they express actions[12]. In the above two sentences, smile and effort are nouns in English, but the translator changes the part of speech when translating. According to the habit of Chinese expression, it is more appropriate to change smile into the verb "咧开嘴笑". Effort in the second example can use the same translation method, in which the noun effort is converted into the verb "费劲". This reflects the original meaning on the one hand and caters to Chinese expression on the other hand.

Unit Shifts

According to Catford, unit shifts refer to grade switching, that is, the equivalent component of the previous unit in the source language is a form corresponding to the unit in different grades of the target language. As is known, unlike hypotactic language represented by English, Chinese is a paratactic language, unit shifts often occur between words, phrases, or sentences in translation. (Catford, 1965:80)

4.2.3.1 Shifts from Words to Phrases or Clauses

Example 17

ST17: Unfortunately，her brain was devious. She might be hurrying across a field, running practically, to get to the pump quickly and rinse the chamomile sap from her legs.

TT17: 遗憾的是她的脑子迂回曲折难以捉摸。比如，她正匆匆穿过一片田野.简直是在奔跑,就为以快赶到压水井那里,洗掉腿上的春黄菊汁。

Example 18

ST18:And although there was not a leaf on that farm that did not make her want to scream, it rolled itself out before her in shameless beauty.

TT18: 尽管那个农庄里没有一草一木不令她失声尖叫，它仍然在她面前展开无耻的美丽。

In example 17, unfortunately is an adverb, while in Chinese a single adverb is seldom used at the beginning of the sentence. Accordingly, the translator transforms the word unfortunately into a Chinese phrase when translating.

In the example18, the literal meanings of the verbs a leaf and scream are "一片叶子" and "尖叫" respectively. If they are put into the translation rigidly, it seems not smooth enough. Therefore, the translator transforms the English noun into Chinese phrase "一草一木" and "失声尖叫" to express her feeling of surprise and happiness, which is more like Chinese expression and makes the target language readers understand the meaning more clearly and completely. Whether in English or Chinese, there are concise expressions. A word can express more complex meanings, and if it is translated literally, it may not express clearly. Therefore, if necessary, the translator should supplement the content left out in the original text.

4.2.3.2 Shifts from sentence to sentence groups

Example 21

ST21: And although she was afraid to leave Sethe and Beloved alone all day not knowing what calamity either one of them would create, she came to realize that her presence in that house had no influence on what either woman did.

TT21: 尽管整天把塞丝和宠儿留在家里，让她提心吊胆，不知道她们哪一个会闯什么祸，但是，她逐渐认识到，自己在房子里存在与否，根本影响不了她们的所作所为。

The sentence above can be seen as an adverbial clause of concession with a negative of the present participle(not v+ing) and two objective clauses. Although the sentence is complex, its meaning is easy to understand. When dealing with this kind of clause, the translator should first break the sentence, that is, disassemble the long sentence into multiple short ones; after that, adjust the word order and add the appropriate subject and conjunction words in the translation. Finally, the whole sentence is translated into Chinese with several sentences to make the translation coherent and smooth.

Intra-system Shifts

Intra-system Shifts refer to the case that the transformation occurs within the system. In other words, if the source and target languages feature fixed structures, but the translation needs to select a non-corresponding term in the translation system. For example, nouns in English and French have singular and plural forms, but the translator does not translate the singular and plural forms in the original into corresponding forms.

Example 22

ST22: On a riverbank in the cool of a summer evening two women struggled under a shower of silvery blue.

TT22: 在一个夏夜微凉的河岸上,两个女人在银蓝色的光芒下挣扎着。

Articles are the most frequently used words in English. However, it is difficult for the Chinese to learn articles. During translation, the meaning of an article can not be underestimated. To deal with it correctly is necessary to improve the quality of translation, and sometimes even the key to the success of translation.

The indefinite article has two grammatical functions: the generic function and the numerical function. When the indefinite article helps to explain the category of a noun, that is, when the indefinite article is used in the generic sense, it should not be translated as "一". In example 22, if the literal translation of a shower of silvery blue is "一道银蓝色的光芒", then the translator does not understand the usage of the indefinite article a very well. Or not familiar with Chinese expressions. Here, the translator deletes “一道” in the translation to improve the quality of the translation.

Example 23

ST23: She flattened herself on the ground, dirtying her bold stripes, and touched the rocking faces with her own.

TT23: 她平趴在地上,用自己的脸去接触水中那些摇动的脸，衣服上奔放的条纹都弄脏了。

The is a definite article commonly used by native English speakers. For English learners, the meaning of this phrase is easy to understand while how to translate it is very variable according to different contexts. In fact, there are many optional means of translating the word the in Chinese by applying “这”、“一”、“有个”、“那些”etc. Therefore, in the sentence above, the translator applies the Intra-system Shifts to achieve the equivalence of meaning by using “那些”.

Conclusion

This paper studies the feasibility of Catford’s Translation Shift Theory in literary novel translation with the material from Toni, Morrison's Beloved, a famous novel written by numerous people. The thesis focuses on the advantages of translation shift theory.

Major Findings of the Study

After the analysis of Beloved's Chinese translation translated by Pan Yue and Lei Ge from the perspective of Catford's Translation Shift Theory. The author sees that the translators use many translation methods in the process of translation, especially Catford's Translation Shift Theory, which can be clearly embodied in translation. Because English and Chinese belong to two different language families, and there are great differences in grammatical structure, the shift is essential in English-Chinese translation. In addition, I also found that.

Firstly, Catford's Translation shift Theory can be applied to the translation of novels. Moreover, this theory is also essential in translation. It is a strategy and method to make the translation closer to the original text, so as to achieve equivalence.

Secondly, the translation of literary novels is the most difficult among different texts. Because the language of literary works is more visualized, and more rhetorical figures are used to express complex emotions. For translators, translating literary novels should not only accurately convey the information of the article, but also express the author's complex feelings.

Secondly, the translation of literary novels is the most difficult among different genres. Because the language of literary works is more visualized, and more rhetorical figures are used to express complex emotions. For translators, translating literary novels should not only accurately convey the information of the article, but also express the author's complex feelings.--Fu Hongyan (talk) 07:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Limitations of the Study

The whole thesis discusses the feasibility of Catford's Translation Shift Theory in literary translation. The examples selected by the author do prove this. However, the limitations of this theory are quite obvious. This theory only applies to sentences and sentences below, and is not suitable for larger units, such as paragraphs and texts. As a literary novel, the connotation and emotion of books are the essences of novels, which require the translator to convey them well, and shift theory just ignores this phenomenon. Therefore, in the actual translation process, except Catford's Translation Shift Theory, other translation methods can also be used, such as Foreignization and Domestication, Functional Equivalence, and so on.

References

Catford J C (1965). A Linguistic Theory of Translation[M]. London: Oxford University Press, 85－91.

Halliday M A(2005). On Grammer[M]. London: Continuum International Publishing.

Lian Shuneng 连淑能(1993). 英汉对比研究[M] Contrastive Studies of English and Chinese. 北京: 高等教育出版社 Beijing: Higher education Press, 90.

Lin Ling 林铃（2009）．卡特福德翻译转换模式下的翻译过程研究[J] A Study on the Translation Process under Catford's Translation Transformation Model．外语教育与教学 Foreign Language Teaching and Learning，5：74-75，82．

Mao Jingjing 毛菁菁(2015). 翻译转换理论在汉英翻译中的应用——以莫言《红高粱》英译本为例[J] The Application of Translation Shift Theory in C- E Translation -- Taking the English Version of Mo Yan's Red Sorghum as an Example. 兰州教育学院学报 Journal of Lanzhou Institute of Education, 3: 145-146.

Monday J(2006). Introducing Translation Studies [M]. London: Routledge.

Mu Lei 穆雷 (1990)．评卡特福德的《翻译的语言学理论》[J] On Catford‘s A Linguistic Theory of Translation. 外语教学 Foreign Language Teaching，2：37-42．

Pan Yue & Lei Ge 潘岳、雷格 (1996). 宠儿[M] Beloved. 北京：中国文学出版社 Beijing:Chinese Literature Press, 3-245.

Vinay J P, Darbelnet J (1958). Translation and activism[M]. Paris: Didier.

Zhong Jingyao 仲晶瑶(2003). 从动词特性看英汉介词[J] Prepositions in English and Chinese from the Perspective of Verb Characteristics. 黑龙江教育学院学报 Journal of Heilongjiang Institute of Education , 3: 84-85.