Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zhang Ailing"

From China Studies Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
This looks great! [[User:Pips|Pips]] 21:04, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 
This looks great! [[User:Pips|Pips]] 21:04, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
Your layout was looking a little strange, so I took the liberty to change it for you.[[User:Mattstrock|Mattstrock]] 04:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
Thanks Matt!
 +
 +
I loved the article. Perhaps a few more sources would help to flesh it out a bit more. For example, was there no controversy about her? Great job of citing your sources within the body of the article. A suggestion- you should probably cut "reddragon"'s comment out and copy it on to this page- right now, it looks like a weird start to your article. [[User:Dekeo|Dekeo]] 21:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
I enjoyed this presentation. I though it was well done. I would have liked to see more of your opinion in the wiky and maybe one picture. Reddragon.
 +
 +
Dear Corinne, looks good to me, good pictures, text is also good structured and written. There is still room for improvement:
 +
* Could be even longer.
 +
* You could have written more about her position in literary history, her works and how she influenced other writers, especially female writers.
 +
* Indicate sources for photos (especially license, see [[Gong Li]])
 +
* Indicate sources for each paragraph of the text (or no source, if your own work)
 +
Best, [[User:Root|Root]] 12:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
The best page I have seen in this web.It's elaborated and well-organized.

Latest revision as of 18:02, 10 June 2016

That first line is looking kind of funky... Ellafitzgerald 05:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

This looks great! Pips 21:04, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Your layout was looking a little strange, so I took the liberty to change it for you.Mattstrock 04:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Matt!

I loved the article. Perhaps a few more sources would help to flesh it out a bit more. For example, was there no controversy about her? Great job of citing your sources within the body of the article. A suggestion- you should probably cut "reddragon"'s comment out and copy it on to this page- right now, it looks like a weird start to your article. Dekeo 21:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

I enjoyed this presentation. I though it was well done. I would have liked to see more of your opinion in the wiky and maybe one picture. Reddragon.

Dear Corinne, looks good to me, good pictures, text is also good structured and written. There is still room for improvement:

  • Could be even longer.
  • You could have written more about her position in literary history, her works and how she influenced other writers, especially female writers.
  • Indicate sources for photos (especially license, see Gong Li)
  • Indicate sources for each paragraph of the text (or no source, if your own work)

Best, Root 12:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

The best page I have seen in this web.It's elaborated and well-organized.