Difference between revisions of "Talk:Han Han"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Looked like you went well into depth in your presentation, and I assume that your paper will be equally as brilliant. --[[User:Foot|Foot]] 06:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC) | Looked like you went well into depth in your presentation, and I assume that your paper will be equally as brilliant. --[[User:Foot|Foot]] 06:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | The version I got by email looks good to me. However, there are some similarities | + | The version I got by email looks good to me. However, there are some similarities with Wikipedia (the ones not added there by you). Also the sources should be mentioned in a more detailed way, sometimes you only mention article title and journal title, without year, issue etc. Best, [[User:Root|Root]] 21:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC) |
| + | |||
I liked your presentation. You seemed to answer in ways that he would have.[[User:Pips|Pips]] 22:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | I liked your presentation. You seemed to answer in ways that he would have.[[User:Pips|Pips]] 22:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:38, 7 December 2012
Looked like you went well into depth in your presentation, and I assume that your paper will be equally as brilliant. --Foot 06:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
The version I got by email looks good to me. However, there are some similarities with Wikipedia (the ones not added there by you). Also the sources should be mentioned in a more detailed way, sometimes you only mention article title and journal title, without year, issue etc. Best, Root 21:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
I liked your presentation. You seemed to answer in ways that he would have.Pips 22:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC)