Difference between revisions of "Talk:Novel 'Jin Ping Mei'"

From China Studies Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Looks super good! I really like the formatting and the information included there. Very clearly formatted which makes it easy to follow and understand. --[[User:Chameleon|Chameleon]] ([[User talk:Chameleon|talk]]) 19:40, 16 April 2013 (CEST)
 +
 
I still need to expand some of my sections and upload my presentation. --[[User:TaraDFroisland|MerchantThief]] ([[User talk:TaraDFroisland|talk]]) 07:39, 14 April 2013 (CEST)
 
I still need to expand some of my sections and upload my presentation. --[[User:TaraDFroisland|MerchantThief]] ([[User talk:TaraDFroisland|talk]]) 07:39, 14 April 2013 (CEST)
  
 
Your page looks good; the organization of the page is one of the strongest points. The pictures look relevant and the information is good. Not sure what else to say; it looks strong. --[[User:Brandon H|Cappuccino]]
 
Your page looks good; the organization of the page is one of the strongest points. The pictures look relevant and the information is good. Not sure what else to say; it looks strong. --[[User:Brandon H|Cappuccino]]
 +
 +
Format of the article was great.  Also the pictures added were a nice touch. Solid article, no complaints from me.--[[User:Joshua B.|Joshua B.]] ([[User talk:Joshua B.|talk]]) 22:16, 16 April 2013 (CEST)
 +
 +
I think your presentation and the wiki page go well together. Both were really engaging. I did feel like some of the pictures were really big and over powered your article in some places. But overall I enjoyed it. [[User:Samantha S|Samantha S]] ([[User talk:Samantha S|talk]]) 05:40, 17 April 2013 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 05:40, 17 April 2013

Looks super good! I really like the formatting and the information included there. Very clearly formatted which makes it easy to follow and understand. --Chameleon (talk) 19:40, 16 April 2013 (CEST)

I still need to expand some of my sections and upload my presentation. --MerchantThief (talk) 07:39, 14 April 2013 (CEST)

Your page looks good; the organization of the page is one of the strongest points. The pictures look relevant and the information is good. Not sure what else to say; it looks strong. --Cappuccino

Format of the article was great. Also the pictures added were a nice touch. Solid article, no complaints from me.--Joshua B. (talk) 22:16, 16 April 2013 (CEST)

I think your presentation and the wiki page go well together. Both were really engaging. I did feel like some of the pictures were really big and over powered your article in some places. But overall I enjoyed it. Samantha S (talk) 05:40, 17 April 2013 (CEST)