Difference between revisions of "China Economy"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
= Rating of China = | = Rating of China = | ||
| − | I begin by stating I feel inadequate to rate such an immensely huge country, one with such a long standing and rich history. For instance, China has a history of colleges (schools) and texts we can affectionately regard as encyclopedias dating back to pre-Jesus Christ days. A country in a niche of its own, it has not too often been overrun with the sanctifying cry of war as Europe-has. It is a silent giant steeped in tradition and honored by roots of a class of people | + | I begin by stating I feel inadequate to rate such an immensely huge country, one with such a long standing and rich history. For instance, China has a history of colleges (schools) and texts we can affectionately regard as encyclopedias dating back to pre-Jesus Christ days. A country in a niche of its own, it has not too often been overrun with the sanctifying cry of war as Europe-has. It is a silent giant steeped in tradition and honored by roots of a class of people of over 1 billion strong. Our roots in the USA have grown uniquely from the roots the likes of European’s who sued for religious freedoms. Our country is capitalistic and finds strength in economic growth. |
Whereas Chinese people are stuck in a rut of one child policy, it gets a rating of zero corrected for recent news that the leaders of the Republic are considering making a change--THREE. Everybody knows that for a country to grow it needs people to labor. With such a strangle-hold on birth rate an economy is doomed. It has been reported that the dowry of a woman at the age of 30 years is one earned out incredibly hard toil, even striking at the core of her virtue- (Dr. Woesler’s reports from mainland China.) | Whereas Chinese people are stuck in a rut of one child policy, it gets a rating of zero corrected for recent news that the leaders of the Republic are considering making a change--THREE. Everybody knows that for a country to grow it needs people to labor. With such a strangle-hold on birth rate an economy is doomed. It has been reported that the dowry of a woman at the age of 30 years is one earned out incredibly hard toil, even striking at the core of her virtue- (Dr. Woesler’s reports from mainland China.) | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Whereas China builds numerous apartments and has a very poor income level per person, it gets a –THREE. The wealth must be distributed in order to make things fair. This was brought to my attention in the class session where I presented my “China go green” power point. With millions of vacant apartments one might think the economic bubble would burst, yet it hasn’t. I believe the government must regard the individual-more, not the unlike of which is our Bill of Rights. | Whereas China builds numerous apartments and has a very poor income level per person, it gets a –THREE. The wealth must be distributed in order to make things fair. This was brought to my attention in the class session where I presented my “China go green” power point. With millions of vacant apartments one might think the economic bubble would burst, yet it hasn’t. I believe the government must regard the individual-more, not the unlike of which is our Bill of Rights. | ||
| − | I have ranked China 7 times in broad categories. It’s scores are: 6, 10, 5, 6, 10, 10, 3, and 3, the categories are resources,6; character of people,10; infrastructure,5; spirituality,6; go green,10; ideal to improve,10; bubble burst,3, and one child policy,3. I expect a bright future for China. I would like to learn its language. I believe it is not a warring state. It does invest in military. What a tragedy that we have to do such silly things. On average China gets a 54 ranking out of a possible 80. How does it rank with you? | + | I have ranked China 7 times in broad categories. It’s scores are: 6, 10, 5, 6, 10, 10, 3, and 3, the categories are resources,6; character of people,10; infrastructure,5; spirituality,6; go green,10; ideal to improve,10; bubble burst,3, and one child policy,3. I expect a bright future for China. I would like to learn its language. I believe it is not a warring state. It does invest in military. What a tragedy that we have to do such silly things. On average China gets a 54 ranking out of a possible 80. How does it rank with you?[[User:Tim G|Tim G]] 12:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC) |
= Comparison to the US = | = Comparison to the US = | ||
Revision as of 14:36, 3 December 2012
This article tries a rating of China, not from a judge, but from an environmental scientist student attending a culture class on China in the fall of 2012. The topic of regard is China “economically,” further, China economically and “green.”
Rating of China
I begin by stating I feel inadequate to rate such an immensely huge country, one with such a long standing and rich history. For instance, China has a history of colleges (schools) and texts we can affectionately regard as encyclopedias dating back to pre-Jesus Christ days. A country in a niche of its own, it has not too often been overrun with the sanctifying cry of war as Europe-has. It is a silent giant steeped in tradition and honored by roots of a class of people of over 1 billion strong. Our roots in the USA have grown uniquely from the roots the likes of European’s who sued for religious freedoms. Our country is capitalistic and finds strength in economic growth.
Whereas Chinese people are stuck in a rut of one child policy, it gets a rating of zero corrected for recent news that the leaders of the Republic are considering making a change--THREE. Everybody knows that for a country to grow it needs people to labor. With such a strangle-hold on birth rate an economy is doomed. It has been reported that the dowry of a woman at the age of 30 years is one earned out incredibly hard toil, even striking at the core of her virtue- (Dr. Woesler’s reports from mainland China.)
Whereas a five year plan of goals for the “improvement” of China has been documented and successfully run twelve consecutive times since 1953, it gets a rating of- -TEN. In 1956 it lost 20 million people to starvation because of gross misjudgment by the government. This can be seen as a terrible sanctification for China, one which surely they will see-to-it that it never happens again. The goals for improvement have taken on the flavor of “watch-out for the citizen, protect him.”
Whereas China is working with architects from the USA to create a city which will be a green city where the city proper can be crossed by a fifteen minute walk, cutting down on the many needs of the automobile, it gets a rating of--TEN. This is to be a city cut out of the countryside and is set to begin this fall. Ten cities are being tested for alternative fuel cars with 1000 cars for the test. This is good testing of a good ideal in real time.
Whereas China and its culture are steeped in religious roots of Confucius, Daoism, Buddhism, Taoism, ancestral worship, and also linked-up with help from the communists, it gets a ranking of --SIX. When an individual cannot effectively make-up his mind to act I think it is bad. This lack of decisiveness and commitment to a cause may be a stumbling block. But it is not the place of me to say things won’t turn-out alright. The worst thing here could be the individual right of choice and the low value placed upon the individual. A person can get hit by a bus and the body only gets thrown away instead-of ID searched-out, burial, or next-of-kin notified. (Class discussion, experience, Dr. Woosler.) The ideal of democratic vote does not exist. Telmond square is an example of what can happen when the Chinese choose to congregate and demonstrate.
Whereas pollution is bad in cities and infrastructure lags behind the industrial trends of bloom, it gets a rating of--FIVE. It is very costly to put-in water, sewer, electric, and gas, apartments for workers coming from rural to urban centers. There is no environmental protection agency, no OSHA, etc. Reports indicate a thirty year growth of at least 10%. Solar and wind hardware are sold from China, leading the world markets. Their prices undercut the bare bones price of production in other countries. Steeling of patents is out of control in China. China’s investment in rail, roads, and energy is staggering and commendable. Relocation of peoples to the western part of China so as to get a 51% majority influx for a purer Chinese representation is interesting to say the least. This big bag of bones is a bugger to babble about or to blubber-over. After dealing with this and still seeing a positive result anybody will be proud and hopeful toward the future. Imagine them this and us, all have to do is elect the next president of the United States.
Whereas the Chinese people are respectful and have strong character, it gets a rating of--TEN. Imagine a culture where education attainment is very highly respected and job leadership also. A desire of a person is to understand your ranking and pay you respect for your arrival and accomplishment. Imagine having to relocate from your rural home to an urban one because the government said so. Are there not possibilities to be separated from family? I view the Chinese as very obedient people, ones that can find themselves in a situation and be able to turn it around and call it a blessing. A view of skyscrapers of Chinese design reveals good taste and belief in the unseen world around us.
Whereas China is currently a land of undeveloped raw materials, it gets a rating of—SIX. China has done fine by importing jobs and materials and industry and making a good go of them. Can this be maintained? Whereas China builds numerous apartments and has a very poor income level per person, it gets a –THREE. The wealth must be distributed in order to make things fair. This was brought to my attention in the class session where I presented my “China go green” power point. With millions of vacant apartments one might think the economic bubble would burst, yet it hasn’t. I believe the government must regard the individual-more, not the unlike of which is our Bill of Rights.
I have ranked China 7 times in broad categories. It’s scores are: 6, 10, 5, 6, 10, 10, 3, and 3, the categories are resources,6; character of people,10; infrastructure,5; spirituality,6; go green,10; ideal to improve,10; bubble burst,3, and one child policy,3. I expect a bright future for China. I would like to learn its language. I believe it is not a warring state. It does invest in military. What a tragedy that we have to do such silly things. On average China gets a 54 ranking out of a possible 80. How does it rank with you?Tim G 12:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Comparison to the US
To be fair, let us rate the USA as a comparison: resources, 7, character of people, 7, infrastructure, 10, spirituality, 8, go green, 8, ideal to improve, 7.5, bubble burst, 5, and one child policy, 9. 61.5 out of 80 is the rating of the USA according to my rating.
Written by Tim G.
Teaching material
PowerPoint presentation [[1]]