Difference between revisions of "Talk:Three Kingdoms"
Anonymous5 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This looks good ,great maps and pictures. Good overall presentation of facts and information.~~~~") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This looks good ,great maps and pictures. Good overall presentation of facts and information.[[User:Anonymous5|Anonymous5]] ([[User talk:Anonymous5|talk]]) 21:29, 1 March 2013 (CET) | This looks good ,great maps and pictures. Good overall presentation of facts and information.[[User:Anonymous5|Anonymous5]] ([[User talk:Anonymous5|talk]]) 21:29, 1 March 2013 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dear Lance, in total a good article. The pictures still need some formating, so far they mess up the text lines. The references you quote are not quotable. En.wikipedia.org is not a reliable source. You could use them as a starting point and quote their references as well as our textbooks. Also, you need to indicate clearly after each sentence and after each paragraph, which sources you use. It still looks a little bit descriptive. I need some conclusions, setting into context, comparison, evaluation and commenting from your side. It would be great if you could still add some book or article sources. [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 18:24, 4 March 2013 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:24, 4 March 2013
This looks good ,great maps and pictures. Good overall presentation of facts and information.Anonymous5 (talk) 21:29, 1 March 2013 (CET)
Dear Lance, in total a good article. The pictures still need some formating, so far they mess up the text lines. The references you quote are not quotable. En.wikipedia.org is not a reliable source. You could use them as a starting point and quote their references as well as our textbooks. Also, you need to indicate clearly after each sentence and after each paragraph, which sources you use. It still looks a little bit descriptive. I need some conclusions, setting into context, comparison, evaluation and commenting from your side. It would be great if you could still add some book or article sources. Root (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2013 (CET)