Difference between revisions of "Talk:The predecessors of newspapers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*Maybe separate the works cited sections a bit more from the rest of your text? | *Maybe separate the works cited sections a bit more from the rest of your text? | ||
--[[User:Meh|Meh]] 05:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC) | --[[User:Meh|Meh]] 05:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===comment 3=== | ||
| + | I'm just curious, what exactly does "The first successful Chinese-language newspaper was published in Hong Kong in 1864." mean? Were there other not successful newspapers? | ||
| + | It looks great but rather short. This is understandable because there isnt really much to say about it. Maybe better structure or clearer text? --[[User:Checksum|Checksum]] 07:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:01, 19 April 2012
Add some Pictures and Fix your title with proper capitalization. Alchemist1330
Comment 2
- Some pictures would be nice - if there are any, that is.
- Maybe separate the works cited sections a bit more from the rest of your text?
--Meh 05:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
comment 3
I'm just curious, what exactly does "The first successful Chinese-language newspaper was published in Hong Kong in 1864." mean? Were there other not successful newspapers? It looks great but rather short. This is understandable because there isnt really much to say about it. Maybe better structure or clearer text? --Checksum 07:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)