Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lu Xun (1881-1936)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
Well done, very concise. [[User:Pips|Pips]] 17:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC) | Well done, very concise. [[User:Pips|Pips]] 17:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
Not bad, formatting looks ok, but did it meet all the requirements? Mr. Woesler said he wanted more commentary and not just "the facts." [[User:Mingemperor|Mingemperor]] 17:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC) | Not bad, formatting looks ok, but did it meet all the requirements? Mr. Woesler said he wanted more commentary and not just "the facts." [[User:Mingemperor|Mingemperor]] 17:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Too Short. We need deeper information on the best Chinese writer ever. Otherwise, well done. --[[User:Foot|Foot]] 20:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:02, 10 October 2012
Well done, very concise. Pips 17:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
It looks really good! Great format and images! Ellafitzgerald 05:30, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Not bad, formatting looks ok, but did it meet all the requirements? Mr. Woesler said he wanted more commentary and not just "the facts." Mingemperor 17:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Too Short. We need deeper information on the best Chinese writer ever. Otherwise, well done. --Foot 20:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC)