Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lu Xun (1881-1936)"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Too Short. We need deeper information on the best Chinese writer ever. Otherwise, well done. --[[User:Foot|Foot]] 20:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC) | Too Short. We need deeper information on the best Chinese writer ever. Otherwise, well done. --[[User:Foot|Foot]] 20:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | I though this presentation needed more preparation. I would have like to know more about the author. Reddragon. | |
| + | |||
| + | Nice introduction to an influential writer that we, in the U.S. ought to know more about. You mention "many pen names" but don't list any of them. It might help someone who would like to find some of his works.[[User:Dekeo|Dekeo]] 19:56, 12 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 12 October 2012
Well done, very concise. Pips 17:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
It looks really good! Great format and images! Ellafitzgerald 05:30, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Not bad, formatting looks ok, but did it meet all the requirements? Mr. Woesler said he wanted more commentary and not just "the facts." Mingemperor 17:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Too Short. We need deeper information on the best Chinese writer ever. Otherwise, well done. --Foot 20:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
I though this presentation needed more preparation. I would have like to know more about the author. Reddragon.
Nice introduction to an influential writer that we, in the U.S. ought to know more about. You mention "many pen names" but don't list any of them. It might help someone who would like to find some of his works.Dekeo 19:56, 12 October 2012 (UTC)