Difference between revisions of "Talk:The 5 Canonized Classics"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | =New comments in 2013= | ||
| + | Dear Kami, please start by uploading your powerpoint presentation and then revise the existing article. Now it is still too short. The final version should be 7 pages. You need to stick to the 1st person narrative ("I", "me" etc.) and not only describe things, but also switch to the commentator role (maybe indicated by "Contemporary Commentator" and then evaluate and discuss the topic from different angles, put it into context, criticize etc.). If you want to write less, you can integrate more pictures. Please make sure to indicate your source after each sentence or, if there is a whole paragraph with the same source, after each paragraph. You can indicate it like "Smith 2009:345" and in the final section "References" write the long version "Smith, Jared, Confucius revisted, Yale University Press 2009, 415 pp." In the edit mode, section headers are indicated with "=" and sub section headers with "==". In the edit mode, paragraphs need to be marked with 2 line feeds ("Enter" key). 1 Line feed will not show up as a paragraph. For additional editing tips, including how to indicate sources and how to find copyright free pictures, please refer to [http://wiki.vm.rub.de/uvu/index.php/uvu:Community_Portal]. Good luck with your composition! Best, [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 13:42, 25 February 2013 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Old comments= | ||
Dear Arnold, that looks really good to me. Please still indicate the sources. You can look at the other articles for how to do it. Best, [[User:Root|Root]] 05:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC) | Dear Arnold, that looks really good to me. Please still indicate the sources. You can look at the other articles for how to do it. Best, [[User:Root|Root]] 05:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:42, 25 February 2013
New comments in 2013
Dear Kami, please start by uploading your powerpoint presentation and then revise the existing article. Now it is still too short. The final version should be 7 pages. You need to stick to the 1st person narrative ("I", "me" etc.) and not only describe things, but also switch to the commentator role (maybe indicated by "Contemporary Commentator" and then evaluate and discuss the topic from different angles, put it into context, criticize etc.). If you want to write less, you can integrate more pictures. Please make sure to indicate your source after each sentence or, if there is a whole paragraph with the same source, after each paragraph. You can indicate it like "Smith 2009:345" and in the final section "References" write the long version "Smith, Jared, Confucius revisted, Yale University Press 2009, 415 pp." In the edit mode, section headers are indicated with "=" and sub section headers with "==". In the edit mode, paragraphs need to be marked with 2 line feeds ("Enter" key). 1 Line feed will not show up as a paragraph. For additional editing tips, including how to indicate sources and how to find copyright free pictures, please refer to [1]. Good luck with your composition! Best, Root (talk) 13:42, 25 February 2013 (CET)
Old comments
Dear Arnold, that looks really good to me. Please still indicate the sources. You can look at the other articles for how to do it. Best, Root 05:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
This looks very good I would try to find at least one picture to add though I realize that may be hard to. Alchemist1330
Comment 2
No one adds pictures anymore???? There may exist some pictures of the stuff in calligraphy... --Meh 06:44, 19 April 2012 (UTC)