Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Merchant Elite and Vernacular Writing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Really nicely done. The formatting is interesting and broken up well. The illustrations are well-placed and balanced. The information is easy to follow and said well. Looks good. --[[User:Chameleon|Chameleon]] ([[User talk:Chameleon|talk]]) 22:16, 15 April 2013 (CEST) | Really nicely done. The formatting is interesting and broken up well. The illustrations are well-placed and balanced. The information is easy to follow and said well. Looks good. --[[User:Chameleon|Chameleon]] ([[User talk:Chameleon|talk]]) 22:16, 15 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Very thorough, well-researched work. [[User:Ignatius J Reilly|Ignatius J Reilly]] ([[User talk:Ignatius J Reilly|talk]]) 02:42, 16 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 02:42, 16 April 2013
Maybe you could add more info on what Vernacular Writing means? --MerchantThief (talk) 10:25, 14 April 2013 (CEST)
Really nicely done. The formatting is interesting and broken up well. The illustrations are well-placed and balanced. The information is easy to follow and said well. Looks good. --Chameleon (talk) 22:16, 15 April 2013 (CEST)
Very thorough, well-researched work. Ignatius J Reilly (talk) 02:42, 16 April 2013 (CEST)