Difference between revisions of "Talk:Novel 'Jin Ping Mei'"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Your page looks good; the organization of the page is one of the strongest points. The pictures look relevant and the information is good. Not sure what else to say; it looks strong. --[[User:Brandon H|Cappuccino]] | Your page looks good; the organization of the page is one of the strongest points. The pictures look relevant and the information is good. Not sure what else to say; it looks strong. --[[User:Brandon H|Cappuccino]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Format of the article was great. Also the pictures added were a nice touch. Solid article, no complaints from me.--[[User:Joshua B.|Joshua B.]] ([[User talk:Joshua B.|talk]]) 22:16, 16 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 22:16, 16 April 2013
Looks super good! I really like the formatting and the information included there. Very clearly formatted which makes it easy to follow and understand. --Chameleon (talk) 19:40, 16 April 2013 (CEST)
I still need to expand some of my sections and upload my presentation. --MerchantThief (talk) 07:39, 14 April 2013 (CEST)
Your page looks good; the organization of the page is one of the strongest points. The pictures look relevant and the information is good. Not sure what else to say; it looks strong. --Cappuccino
Format of the article was great. Also the pictures added were a nice touch. Solid article, no complaints from me.--Joshua B. (talk) 22:16, 16 April 2013 (CEST)