Talk:Wang Anshi

From China Studies Wiki
Revision as of 06:17, 17 April 2013 by Samantha S (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your page looks very good. The organization is specifically very strong. The layout is interesting and the information is presented in a logical and understandable way. I especially liked the author notes on the biography. I think more commentary could definitely add to the piece. Also, I think you section "What is 'Ten Thousand Word Memorial?'" could be divided into smaller categories. You can make smaller headings by putting a different number of "=" around your headings. Five "=" marks

makes a bolded, unobtrusive heading, like this,

which can be effectively added in to strengthen an already strong page. Cappuccino (talk)


I agree, the section "what is ten thousand word memorial" could be more broken up with smaller headings. Your page looks good though. I also wouldn't mind reading more under the biography section. It was kind of short, but maybe it's hard to find information about him, i don't know. But nicely done! It looks great and the pictures are fun. Good choice --Chameleon (talk) 22:10, 15 April 2013 (CEST)


If the original 10k word memorial is a copy of the original document or primary text, perhaps a way to set that apart to make it more apparent? Otherwise, well done. As stated before, nice use of pictures. Ignatius J Reilly (talk) 02:39, 16 April 2013 (CEST)

Wow thats awesome information! Agreed that subheadings could help break it up. Love how you link to external sources--MerchantThief (talk) 07:25, 16 April 2013 (CEST).

Thought the article was awesome. Only suggestion would be to maybe split up the 10K word Memorial if possible. As I saw that, It seemed a daunting task to read it. --Joshua B. (talk) 22:15, 16 April 2013 (CEST)


I wrote this article of course. I tried to make the "ten thousand word memorial" italic but it wouldn't work at all. Also I was debating only putting parts of the document...I don't like the way it looks because of all the writing in one place. Samantha S (talk) 06:17, 17 April 2013 (CEST)