History of China/Chapter 3

From China Studies Wiki
< History of China
Revision as of 13:19, 16 April 2026 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Import Chapter 3: The Shang Dynasty)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Chapter 3: The Shang Dynasty — Oracle Bones, Bronze, and the First Chinese State (ca. 1600–1046 BCE)

1. Introduction: The Shang as the First Verified Dynasty

The Shang dynasty holds a unique position in the history of China: it is the earliest Chinese dynasty whose existence has been confirmed by contemporary written evidence. While the Xia dynasty, discussed in the previous chapter, remains a subject of scholarly debate — attested in later texts but lacking contemporary documentation — the Shang left behind a massive corpus of inscribed oracle bones and bronze vessels that provide direct, firsthand evidence of its political structure, religious practices, military activities, and daily life. The discovery and decipherment of these inscriptions, beginning in the late nineteenth century, ranks among the greatest achievements of modern historical scholarship and transformed the study of early China from a branch of classical philology into an empirically grounded discipline.

According to the traditional account preserved in Sima Qian's Shiji (ca. 100 BCE), the Shang dynasty was founded by a king named Tang (汤), who overthrew the last ruler of the Xia, and lasted for approximately thirty kings over some five to six centuries. Modern scholarship, combining archaeological evidence with textual analysis, generally dates the Shang to approximately 1600–1046 BCE, though the beginning date remains uncertain. The dynasty's capital moved several times; the best-known capital, Yin (殷), was located near modern Anyang in Henan province and served as the royal seat during the dynasty's last two and a half centuries (the so-called "Late Shang" period, ca. 1300–1046 BCE). It is from Yin that the vast majority of our evidence comes.

This chapter examines the Shang dynasty in all its dimensions — as a political entity, a religious system, a technological achievement, and a cultural complex — drawing on the rich archaeological and inscriptional evidence that has accumulated over more than a century of excavation and research.

2. The Discovery of the Shang: From Antiquarian Legend to Archaeological Science

The Shang dynasty was known from transmitted texts throughout Chinese history, but for most of that time it was regarded as a semi-legendary period, its reality impossible to verify independently. This changed dramatically in 1899, when the scholar and antiquarian Wang Yirong (王懿荣), then chancellor of the Imperial Academy in Beijing, noticed that some of the "dragon bones" (龙骨, longgu) sold in Chinese traditional medicine shops bore what appeared to be ancient inscriptions. Wang recognized these as an archaic form of Chinese writing and began collecting them. His discovery — the identification of oracle bone inscriptions as records of the Shang royal court — opened an entirely new window onto ancient Chinese civilization.[1]

Wang Yirong died in 1900, during the Boxer Uprising, but his collection passed to the scholar Liu E (刘鹗), who published the first collection of oracle bone rubbings in 1903. Over the following decades, as more bones appeared on the antiquarian market, scholars traced their provenance to Xiaotun (小屯) village, near Anyang in Henan province. In 1928, the newly established Academia Sinica began systematic excavations at Anyang under the direction of Li Ji (李济), China's first professionally trained archaeologist. The Anyang excavations, conducted in fifteen seasons between 1928 and 1937 (interrupted by the Japanese invasion), yielded tens of thousands of oracle bones, spectacular bronze vessels, royal tombs of enormous size, and the foundations of palatial buildings — confirming beyond doubt the historical reality of the Shang dynasty and establishing Anyang as its last capital.[2]

Since 1949, excavations have continued at Anyang and have expanded to many other Shang-period sites across northern China. The most important non-Anyang Shang site is Zhengzhou (郑州), where a massive walled city dating to the early Shang period (the Erligang phase, ca. 1,600–1,400 BCE) was discovered in the 1950s. The Zhengzhou site, with its enormous rammed-earth wall enclosing an area of approximately 3.4 square kilometers, demonstrates that the Shang state was capable of mobilizing vast human labor for construction projects from an early date.

3. Anyang: The Royal Capital

The Shang capital at Yin, located in the Anyang area of northern Henan, was a sprawling complex rather than a compact, walled city. Unlike the earlier Shang capital at Zhengzhou, Anyang appears to have lacked a continuous city wall; instead, it consisted of a series of functionally distinct zones spread over an area of approximately 30 square kilometers along the Huan River.

The core of the capital was the palace-temple complex at Xiaotun, where the remains of over fifty rammed-earth building foundations have been identified. These structures, arranged in three main clusters, are believed to have served as royal residences, ancestral temples, and administrative buildings. The largest foundations measure over 30 meters in length, with rows of large post holes indicating that the buildings were substantial timber-framed structures with thatched or tiled roofs. Beneath the foundations, and in pits nearby, archaeologists have found the remains of human sacrificial victims — men, women, and children, some decapitated, some buried alive — whose deaths accompanied the construction or consecration of royal buildings.[3]

North of the Huan River, at Xibeigang (西北冈), lies the royal cemetery, containing eleven large cruciform-shaped tombs and over a thousand smaller burials. The large tombs, attributed to Shang kings, are enormous underground chambers, the largest measuring approximately 14 by 18 meters at the mouth and extending to a depth of over 12 meters, with four ramps extending from the cardinal directions. Though all eleven royal tombs were robbed in antiquity, the remaining contents — fragments of bronze, jade, and bone; chariot fittings; and the skeletons of sacrificial victims buried in and around the tombs — attest to the extraordinary wealth and power of the Shang royal house.

The most spectacular unlooted Shang tomb was discovered not at Xibeigang but at Xiaotun in 1976, when the archaeologist Zheng Zhenxiang (郑振香) excavated the tomb of Fu Hao (妇好), identified through bronze inscriptions as a consort of King Wu Ding (武丁, r. ca. 1250–1192 BCE). Fu Hao's tomb, though relatively small (5.6 by 4 meters), contained over 1,600 objects, including 468 bronze vessels and weapons, 755 jade objects, 564 bone artifacts, and 6,900 cowrie shells (used as a form of currency). The bronzes include some of the finest examples of Shang craftsmanship, and the inscriptions on many of the vessels confirm Fu Hao's identity and her remarkably active role in Shang political and military life.[4]

4. Oracle Bone Inscriptions: The Birth of Chinese Writing

The oracle bone inscriptions (甲骨文, jiaguwen) are the earliest substantial corpus of Chinese writing and one of the most important primary sources for any period of Chinese history. They were produced as part of the Shang practice of pyromantic divination: the king or his diviners would address questions to the royal ancestors or to the high god Di (帝) by applying a heated rod to the back of a turtle plastron (belly shell) or cattle scapula (shoulder blade), causing the front surface to crack. The cracks were then "read" as positive or negative answers to the question posed. In many cases, the question, the date, the name of the diviner, and sometimes the result of the divination were inscribed on the bone or shell, creating a permanent record.

Over 150,000 oracle bone fragments have been recovered, the vast majority from the Anyang site, and they bear an estimated 4,500 distinct characters. Of these, approximately 1,700 have been deciphered; the remainder are either too rare to identify with certainty or represent personal names, place names, or technical terms whose referents are unknown. The deciphered characters demonstrate that oracle bone script is a direct ancestor of modern Chinese characters: many oracle bone graphs are recognizable as archaic forms of characters still in use today, and the writing system already employs the same basic structural principles (pictographic, ideographic, and phonetic-semantic compound characters) that characterize all subsequent forms of Chinese writing.[5]

The content of the oracle bone inscriptions ranges widely. The most common topics include:

Weather and agriculture: Will it rain in the next ten days? Will the millet harvest be good? Should the king order planting to begin?

War and military campaigns: Should the king attack the Qiang (羌) people? Will the campaign be successful? How many captives should be offered in sacrifice?

Hunting: Will the king's hunt be successful? Will he encounter game?

Royal health and reproduction: Is the queen's illness caused by the anger of ancestor X? Will the queen bear a son?

Ancestral sacrifice: Should the king offer cattle, sheep, or human victims to ancestor Y? On which day should the sacrifice be performed?

Dreams and ominous events: The king dreamed of X — is this an auspicious or inauspicious sign?

These inscriptions provide an extraordinarily detailed picture of Shang royal life, but they also have significant limitations as historical sources. They represent the concerns of the king and his immediate circle, not of Shang society as a whole. They record questions asked of the spirit world, not objective descriptions of events. And they are concentrated in the last two and a half centuries of the dynasty (the reigns of kings from Wu Ding to Di Xin), leaving the earlier Shang largely undocumented.[6]

5. Bronze Technology and Ritual Culture

5.1 The Piece-Mold Casting Tradition

The Shang dynasty is one of the great bronze-producing civilizations of the ancient world, and Shang bronze vessels are among the supreme achievements of ancient art and technology. The Shang bronze-casting tradition differed fundamentally from the contemporary traditions of Western Asia, the Mediterranean, and the Eurasian steppe. Whereas these other traditions relied primarily on the lost-wax method (in which a wax model is encased in clay, the wax melted out, and molten bronze poured in), the Shang developed a distinctive piece-mold technique.

In the piece-mold method, the artisan first created a clay model of the desired vessel. Sections of the model's surface were then used to create clay mold pieces, which reproduced the vessel's shape and surface decoration in negative. The model was pared down to serve as a core, and the mold pieces were assembled around it, leaving a narrow gap between core and mold. Molten bronze — an alloy of copper, tin, and sometimes lead — was poured into this gap, filling the space and reproducing the form and decoration of the original model. After cooling, the mold was broken away to reveal the finished vessel.

This technique had several important consequences. It required a high degree of planning and coordination, since the decoration had to be carved into the mold pieces before casting — unlike the lost-wax method, which allowed decoration to be added to the model at any stage. It was particularly well suited to producing vessels with flat surfaces and angular profiles, rather than the rounded forms typical of lost-wax casting. And it encouraged a characteristic decorative style in which pattern and vessel form were integrated from the outset, producing what Robert Bagley has called a "seamless unity of form and ornament."[7]

5.2 Types and Functions of Bronze Vessels

Shang bronze vessels fall into several functional categories, corresponding to the different components of ancestral sacrifice: vessels for cooking food (ding 鼎, li 鬲, yan 甗), vessels for holding grain (gui 簋, xu 盨), vessels for warming and pouring wine (jue 爵, jia 斝, he 盉), vessels for storing wine (you 卣, zun 尊, hu 壶), and vessels for washing (pan 盘, yi 匜). The most important type was the ding — a large, heavy, round or rectangular cauldron on legs, used for cooking sacrificial meat and subsequently treated as the supreme symbol of political authority. Possession of ding signified legitimate rulership; the phrase "asking about the ding" (问鼎, wen ding) became a metaphor for challenging royal authority.

The quantity and quality of bronze produced by the Shang state are staggering. The Simuwu fangding (司母戊方鼎), discovered near Anyang in 1939, is the largest ancient bronze vessel ever found, weighing approximately 833 kilograms and standing 133 centimeters tall. Its production required an estimated 1,000 kilograms of copper, 125 kilograms of tin, and the coordinated labor of hundreds of workers — miners, smelters, charcoal-makers, mold-makers, and casters. The ability to organize such a complex production process on such a large scale is itself powerful evidence of the Shang state's organizational capacity.[8]

5.3 Bronze Decoration: The Taotie and Its World

The most characteristic feature of Shang bronze decoration is the taotie (饕餮) — a frontal animal face with prominent eyes, curved horns or crests, and a complex body composed of interlocking spirals, hooks, and lines. The taotie appears on virtually every category of Shang bronze vessel, as well as on jade objects, bone carvings, and other media. It is the dominant visual motif of Shang civilization, yet its meaning remains one of the great unsolved puzzles of Chinese art history.

The name taotie was applied to the motif by Song dynasty antiquarians (eleventh–thirteenth centuries CE) based on a brief mention in the Lushi chunqiu (ca. 239 BCE), which describes the taotie as a gluttonous monster. Whether the Shang themselves used this term or had a name for the motif at all is unknown. Various scholars have interpreted the taotie as a representation of a specific animal (tiger, ox, owl, deer), as a composite creature combining features of multiple animals, as a shamanic mask, as a representation of a deity or ancestor, or as a purely decorative convention with no specific referent. The most influential recent interpretation, proposed by K.C. Chang, links the taotie to shamanic practice: Chang argues that the animal faces on Shang bronzes represent spirit beings with whom shamans communicated during ritual trances, and that the bronze vessels themselves served as instruments for shamanic communication between the human and spirit worlds.[9]

6. Shang Religion: Ancestors, Divinities, and Sacrifice

The religious world of the Shang, as revealed by the oracle bone inscriptions, was dominated by three categories of supernatural beings: the royal ancestors, the high god Di, and a range of nature spirits associated with rivers, mountains, winds, and other natural phenomena.

The royal ancestors were the most frequently invoked figures in Shang divination. The Shang king communicated with his deceased predecessors through a regular cycle of sacrificial rituals, offering them wine, grain, and animal victims (including cattle, sheep, pigs, dogs, and horses) in exchange for their continued protection and assistance. The ancestors were believed to have the power to influence weather, harvests, battles, and the king's health; they could also send misfortune if neglected or displeased. The sacrificial calendar was organized into a ten-day cycle (旬, xun), with different ancestors receiving offerings on different days according to the heavenly stem (天干, tiangan) associated with their posthumous name.[10]

Above the ancestors stood Di (帝), the supreme deity of the Shang pantheon. Di controlled the forces of nature — wind, rain, thunder, drought — and could command disaster or prosperity. Unlike the ancestors, Di was not addressed directly in divination; the king could petition his ancestors to intercede with Di on his behalf, but he could not communicate with Di directly. The relationship between Di and the royal ancestors is one of the most debated questions in Shang religious studies. Some scholars have argued that Di was a deified ancestor, perhaps the progenitor of the Shang royal line; others have argued that Di was a nature god, a cosmic force, or an abstract principle of universal authority. The Zhou dynasty's concept of Tian (天, Heaven) may have evolved from, or been conflated with, the Shang concept of Di.[11]

Human sacrifice was a prominent feature of Shang religion, on a scale that has few parallels in the ancient world. The oracle bone inscriptions record the sacrifice of captives — primarily prisoners taken in wars against neighboring peoples, especially the Qiang (羌) — in quantities ranging from a few individuals to several hundred at a time. Archaeological evidence confirms the inscriptional record: at Anyang, the remains of thousands of sacrificial victims have been found in and around royal tombs, building foundations, and sacrificial pits. Some victims were decapitated, some dismembered, some buried alive; some were placed in groups, arranged in rows or layers. The Shang conception of the afterlife appears to have required that kings be accompanied in death by servants, soldiers, concubines, charioteers, and their horses and chariots, all of whom were killed and interred with the royal corpse.[12]

The scale and systematization of Shang human sacrifice raise important questions about the nature of the Shang state and its relationship with surrounding peoples. The frequent sacrifice of Qiang captives suggests that warfare against the Qiang and other non-Shang groups served not only political and economic purposes (territorial expansion, resource acquisition, defense) but also religious ones: the capture of sacrificial victims was itself a purpose of military campaigns. This intertwining of warfare and religion was a defining characteristic of the Shang political order.

7. The Shang State and Military Organization

The Shang state was a patrimonial kingdom centered on the person of the king and the royal lineage. The king was the supreme political, military, and religious authority — the only person who could communicate with the royal ancestors through divination, and therefore the indispensable mediator between the human and spirit worlds. Political power radiated outward from the royal court to a network of subordinate lineages, some related to the royal line by blood or marriage and others linked by ties of alliance, tribute, or coercion.

The oracle bone inscriptions reveal a political landscape of considerable complexity. The Shang king directly controlled a core territory (the "royal domain") around the capital, but his authority over more distant regions was exercised through a network of subordinate lords (侯, hou; 伯, bo; and other titles) who governed their own territories, maintained their own military forces, and owed varying degrees of allegiance and tribute to the Shang king. This was not a centralized bureaucratic state in the later Chinese sense; it was a patrimonial system in which personal relationships — kinship, marriage, patronage, and reciprocal obligation — were the primary bonds of political cohesion.[13]

The Shang military was organized around the war chariot, which appears to have been introduced from Central Asia in the mid-second millennium BCE. The Shang chariot was a light, two-wheeled vehicle drawn by two horses and crewed by three men: a driver, an archer, and a spearman. Chariots were expensive to build and maintain, and they required trained horses and skilled drivers; their military significance was therefore as much symbolic as tactical. The possession of chariots marked the Shang elite as a warrior aristocracy, and the burial of chariots with horses and their human crews was a conspicuous display of wealth and power.

Infantry formed the bulk of the Shang army. The oracle bone inscriptions record military mobilizations of up to 13,000 troops — large numbers for the Bronze Age, though these figures may be exaggerated or refer to total forces rather than single campaigns. Weapons included bronze-tipped halberds (戈, ge), spears, daggers, and composite bows with bronze arrowheads. Bronze body armor is not attested; soldiers appear to have relied on leather or lacquered leather for protection, supplemented in some cases by bronze helmets.

The Shang fought frequently against their neighbors, including the Qiang to the west, the Tu Fang (土方) to the north, the Ren Fang (人方) and Yi (夷) to the east, and numerous other groups identified by name in the oracle bone inscriptions. These conflicts were driven by a combination of territorial competition, resource acquisition (particularly captives for sacrifice), and the need to maintain the authority of the Shang king over a politically fragmented landscape. The frequency and ferocity of Shang warfare suggest a world of chronic insecurity, in which military prowess was essential to political survival.[14]

8. The Shang and Surrounding Cultures

One of the most important advances in Shang studies in recent decades has been the recognition that the Shang was not an isolated civilization but one node in a complex network of interacting Bronze Age cultures across East Asia. The traditional narrative, derived from the transmitted texts, portrayed the Shang as the sole center of civilization in its time, surrounded by "barbarian" peoples of little historical consequence. Archaeological discoveries have fundamentally revised this picture.

The most dramatic revision has come from the excavation of the Sanxingdui (三星堆) site in Guanghan, Sichuan province. Discovered in 1986, Sanxingdui's two sacrificial pits yielded a breathtaking assemblage of bronze, gold, jade, and ivory objects unlike anything found at Anyang or any other Shang site. The bronzes include life-sized human figures, monumental face masks with protruding eyes and angular features, a bronze tree over 3.9 meters tall, and gold-covered objects of remarkable craftsmanship. Nothing in the Shang material repertoire prepares one for the Sanxingdui bronzes: their style, iconography, and apparent function are fundamentally different from anything in the Shang tradition.[15]

Sanxingdui demonstrates that the Sichuan Basin was home to a sophisticated Bronze Age civilization that developed independently of the Shang, with its own artistic traditions, religious practices, and political structures. The relationship between Sanxingdui and the Shang is unclear: some Sanxingdui bronzes show Shang influence (particularly in the use of the taotie motif), suggesting contact and exchange, but the overall cultural assemblage is so different that direct political control by the Shang seems unlikely.

Other non-Shang Bronze Age cultures have been identified across southern China. The Panlongcheng (盘龙城) site in Hubei province, dating to the Erligang phase (early Shang), appears to have been a Shang colonial outpost in the middle Yangtze region, suggesting that the early Shang state pursued an expansionist strategy in the south. The Xin'gan (新干) burial in Jiangxi province, dating to the late Shang period, contained a rich assemblage of bronze vessels and weapons that combine Shang and local stylistic elements, suggesting a regional elite that participated in Shang cultural networks while maintaining its own identity. The Wucheng (吴城) site, also in Jiangxi, provides further evidence of a sophisticated bronze-using culture in the middle Yangtze that was influenced by but distinct from the Shang.[16]

To the north and west, the Shang interacted with steppe and semi-steppe cultures that had their own bronze traditions. The Northern Zone, stretching across the border of the steppe and the sown from Gansu to Liaoning, was home to pastoral and semi-pastoral peoples who produced distinctive bronze weapons, tools, and animal-style ornamental plaques. These cultures served as intermediaries in the transmission of technologies — including the chariot, horse domestication techniques, and possibly metallurgical innovations — from the Eurasian steppe to the Chinese heartland.[17]

9. The Fall of Shang

The traditional account of the fall of the Shang, preserved in the Shiji and the Shangshu, is a morality tale. The last Shang king, Di Xin (帝辛, known pejoratively as Zhou 纣), is portrayed as a tyrant of legendary depravity: he built a palace of wine and meat, forced his subjects to engage in orgies, tortured his ministers, and ignored the warnings of loyal advisors. His misrule so alienated the people and the subordinate lords that King Wu of Zhou (周武王), leading a coalition of western states, was able to defeat the Shang army at the Battle of Muye (牧野) in approximately 1046 BCE. Di Xin committed suicide by setting fire to his palace, and the Shang dynasty came to an end.

How much of this narrative is historical fact and how much is moralistic fiction composed by the victorious Zhou to justify their conquest is impossible to determine with certainty. The Zhou had powerful incentives to demonize the last Shang king: their entire political ideology — the Mandate of Heaven — rested on the claim that the Shang had forfeited Heaven's favor through moral failure and that the Zhou had received it in their place. The specific accusations against Di Xin — drunkenness, sexual excess, cruelty — conform so perfectly to the stereotypical portrait of the "bad last ruler" (as seen in the parallel accounts of Jie, the last Xia king) that their historical accuracy must be regarded with suspicion.

What is clear from the archaeological record is that the transition from Shang to Zhou involved significant disruption. The Anyang capital was destroyed and abandoned; major Shang sites across the Yellow River valley were either destroyed or reorganized under new management. The Zhou, based in the Wei River valley in modern Shaanxi, established a new political order that drew on Shang precedents but also introduced fundamental innovations — most notably the fengjian (封建) system of enfeoffment, in which the Zhou king granted territories to members of the royal family and loyal allies, creating a network of semi-autonomous vassal states bound to the Zhou court by ties of kinship, ritual obligation, and political loyalty.[18]

The Shang did not disappear entirely. The Zhou enfeoffed a descendant of the Shang royal line as the lord of Song (宋), a small state in the eastern plain (modern Henan), where Shang cultural and ritual traditions were maintained for several centuries. Elements of Shang culture — the bronze ritual tradition, the ancestral cult, the writing system, divination practices — were absorbed and transformed by the Zhou, becoming the foundation of a shared cultural heritage that would eventually be recognized as "Chinese." In this sense, the fall of the Shang was not an ending but a transition: the beginning of a new phase in the long process by which the diverse peoples and cultures of the Yellow River valley and beyond were woven into the complex fabric of Chinese civilization.

10. The Significance of the Shang

The Shang dynasty's significance extends far beyond its role as the "first" Chinese dynasty. It established patterns and precedents that would shape Chinese civilization for millennia: the centrality of ancestor worship in political and social life; the use of bronze ritual vessels as symbols of legitimate authority; the practice of recording and preserving official records; the integration of religious and political power in the person of the ruler; and the development of a writing system that, despite enormous changes in form and medium, maintains an unbroken continuity from the oracle bones of Anyang to the digital screens of twenty-first-century China.

The Shang also demonstrates the complexity and diversity of ancient Chinese civilization. Far from being a monolithic "Chinese" culture, the Shang was one of several competing Bronze Age civilizations in East Asia, interacting with and influenced by cultures in Sichuan, the Yangtze valley, the northern steppe, and beyond. The eventual emergence of a unified "Chinese" cultural identity was not a foregone conclusion but the product of centuries of contact, conflict, and synthesis among diverse peoples — a process that was only beginning in the Shang period and would not approach completion until the imperial unification of the Qin.

The study of the Shang is a field in rapid transformation. Major new discoveries — the ongoing excavations at Anyang, the revelation of Sanxingdui, the recovery of bamboo and bronze inscriptions from across the Yellow River valley — continue to revise our understanding of this foundational period. As the archaeological record expands, the Shang grows not simpler but more complex, not more familiar but more strange, challenging us to understand the earliest chapters of Chinese history on their own terms rather than through the lens of later tradition.[19]

References

  1. Keightley, Sources of Shang History, 3–17.
  2. Li Chi [Li Ji], Anyang (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1977), 1–30.
  3. Chang, Shang Civilization, 79–130.
  4. Robert L. Thorp, China in the Early Bronze Age: Shang Civilization (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006), 155–178; Institute of Archaeology, CASS, Yinxu Fu Hao mu (Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe, 1980).
  5. Keightley, Sources of Shang History, 18–55; Qiu Xigui, Chinese Writing, trans. Gilbert L. Mattos and Jerry Norman (Berkeley: Society for the Study of Early China and Institute of East Asian Studies, 2000), 29–62.
  6. David N. Keightley, "The Shang: China's First Historical Dynasty," in The Cambridge History of Ancient China, ed. Loewe and Shaughnessy, 232–291.
  7. Bagley, Shang Ritual Bronzes in the Arthur M. Sackler Collections, 21–65; W. Thomas Chase, Ancient Chinese Bronze Art: Casting the Precious Sacral Vessel (New York: China Institute in America, 1991), 10–35.
  8. Jessica Rawson, Chinese Bronzes: Art and Ritual (London: British Museum, 1987), 1–30; Thorp, China in the Early Bronze Age, 179–210.
  9. K.C. Chang, Art, Myth, and Ritual: The Path to Political Authority in Ancient China (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983), 56–80; Robert Bagley, "Meaning and Explanation," in The Problem of Meaning in Early Chinese Ritual Bronzes, ed. Roderick Whitfield (London: Percival David Foundation of Chinese Art, 1993), 34–55.
  10. David N. Keightley, "The Religious Commitment: Shang Theology and the Genesis of Chinese Political Culture," History of Religions 17 (1978): 211–225.
  11. Robert Eno, "Was There a High God Ti in Shang Religion?," Early China 15 (1990): 1–26; Sarah Allan, The Shape of the Turtle: Myth, Art, and Cosmos in Early China (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991), 55–80.
  12. Zhongguo Shehui Kexueyuan Kaogu Yanjiusuo [Institute of Archaeology, CASS], Yinxu de faxian yu yanjiu (Beijing: Kexue chubanshe, 1994), 310–345; Keightley, "Shang," 268–276.
  13. Keightley, "Shang," 244–268; Li Feng, Early China, 68–98.
  14. Edward L. Shaughnessy, "Historical Perspectives on the Introduction of the Chariot into China," Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 48, no. 1 (1988): 189–237; David N. Keightley, "Warfare and Its Representations in Shang Oracle-Bone Inscriptions," in Studies in the History of Chinese Texts (forthcoming).
  15. Robert Bagley, "An Early Bronze Age Culture in Sichuan Province," in Ancient Sichuan: Treasures from a Lost Civilization, ed. Robert Bagley (Seattle: Seattle Art Museum, 2001), 43–66; Jay Xu, "Bronze at Sanxingdui," in The Oxford Handbook of Early China, ed. Childs-Johnson, 285–310.
  16. Kwang-chih Chang, The Archaeology of Ancient China, 4th ed., 313–355; Thorp, China in the Early Bronze Age, 211–240.
  17. Nicola Di Cosmo, Ancient China and Its Enemies, 44–90.
  18. Li Feng, Landscape and Power in Early China: The Crisis and Fall of the Western Zhou, 1045–771 BC (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 1–35; Edward L. Shaughnessy, "Western Zhou History," in The Cambridge History of Ancient China, ed. Loewe and Shaughnessy, 292–351.
  19. For recent surveys, see Li Feng, Early China, 56–102; Thorp, China in the Early Bronze Age, 240–265; Bagley, "Shang Archaeology," 124–231.