History of China/Chapter 17

Previous◀ Chapter 16

History of China

NextChapter 18 ▶

Chapter 17: The Early Republic (1912–1928)

1. Introduction: Revolution Without a State

The Republic of China (中华民国, Zhonghua Minguo), proclaimed on January 1, 1912, was born in hope and immediately engulfed in crisis. The 1911 Revolution had destroyed the world's oldest continuous political system — two millennia of imperial rule — but it had not created the institutions, the consensus, or the leadership necessary to replace it. The sixteen years between the founding of the Republic and the establishment of a national government at Nanjing in 1928 were among the most turbulent, violent, and intellectually fertile in Chinese history. They saw the brief presidency and attempted monarchical restoration of Yuan Shikai, the descent into warlordism and political fragmentation, the May Fourth Movement and the New Culture revolution that transformed Chinese intellectual life, the founding of the Chinese Communist Party, the reorganization of the Guomindang under Sun Yat-sen with Soviet assistance, and the Northern Expedition that reunified the country under Nationalist rule — at the cost of a bloody rupture with the Communists that would shape China's destiny for the remainder of the century.

This period defies simple characterization. It was an era of political chaos — with dozens of rival warlord regimes, multiple governments claiming national legitimacy, and endemic civil war that devastated the countryside and impoverished the population. But it was also an era of extraordinary cultural creativity — when Chinese writers, artists, scholars, and activists engaged in a radical reassessment of their civilization's past and future that produced some of the most important intellectual and literary achievements in modern Chinese history. The early Republic was, in short, a revolutionary interregnum — a period in which the old order had been destroyed but the new order had not yet been built, and in which the fundamental questions of Chinese modernity — What kind of state? What kind of society? What kind of culture? — were debated with an intensity and urgency that have rarely been matched.

2. Yuan Shikai and the Failure of the Republic (1912–1916)

The Republic's first crisis was the presidency of Yuan Shikai (袁世凯, 1859–1916), the former Qing general who had brokered the abdication of the dynasty in exchange for the provisional presidency. Yuan was a pragmatic, authoritarian strongman with deep roots in the late Qing military and bureaucratic establishment. He had no commitment to democratic principles and viewed the Republic primarily as a vehicle for his personal power. Sun Yat-sen, who had surrendered the presidency to Yuan in the expectation that Yuan would uphold the provisional constitution and move toward democratic government, quickly discovered that he had made a Faustian bargain.

The provisional constitution of 1912 established a parliamentary system with a bicameral legislature — the Senate (参议院, Canyiyuan) and the House of Representatives (众议院, Zhongyiyuan) — and guaranteed civil liberties, freedom of the press, and the separation of powers. National elections were held in early 1913, and the newly organized Guomindang (国民党, Guomindang, Nationalist Party), led by the brilliant young politician Song Jiaoren (宋教仁, 1882–1913), won a commanding majority in both chambers. Song, a parliamentary democrat who envisioned a British-style cabinet government with the president as a figurehead, posed a direct threat to Yuan's autocratic ambitions. On March 20, 1913, Song Jiaoren was assassinated at the Shanghai railway station — almost certainly on Yuan's orders, though the evidence was never conclusive enough to secure a conviction.

Song's assassination provoked the "Second Revolution" (二次革命, Erci Geming) of July–September 1913, in which Sun Yat-sen and other Guomindang leaders attempted to rally southern provinces against Yuan. The rebellion was quickly and decisively suppressed by Yuan's superior Beiyang Army forces. Sun fled to Japan, and Yuan moved systematically to consolidate his dictatorship: he dissolved the Guomindang, dismissed the parliament, promulgated a new constitution that concentrated all power in the presidency, and in January 1914 dissolved the remaining provincial assemblies. China's brief experiment with parliamentary democracy was over.

Yuan's ambitions extended further still. On December 12, 1915, he announced his intention to restore the monarchy with himself as emperor, adopting the reign name Hongxian (洪宪, "Grand Constitutional"). The monarchical movement was supported by a coterie of opportunistic advisors and boosted by a farcical petition campaign that presented Yuan with "popular demand" for a new dynasty. But the restoration provoked fierce opposition from across the political spectrum — from republicans, from provincial military commanders who resented Yuan's centralizing ambitions, and even from Yuan's own Beiyang subordinates who feared being subordinated in a new imperial hierarchy. Yunnan province, led by the military commander Cai E (蔡锷, 1882–1916), declared independence in December 1915 and launched the "National Protection War" (护国运动, Huguo Yundong). Province after province followed suit, and Yuan was forced to abandon the restoration in March 1916. Humiliated and ill, he died on June 6, 1916, leaving behind a power vacuum that would plunge China into a decade of warlordism.

3. The Warlord Era (1916–1928)

Yuan Shikai's death unleashed the forces of political fragmentation that had been building since the late Qing. With no leader capable of commanding national authority, China disintegrated into a patchwork of rival military regimes, each controlled by a "warlord" (军阀, junfa) who governed his territory through military force, extracting taxes, conscripting soldiers, and fighting endless wars against his rivals. The warlord era (1916–1928) — though the exact boundaries are debated — was one of the darkest periods in modern Chinese history, characterized by endemic civil war, economic devastation, banditry, and the suffering of the common people.

The warlord system had its roots in the decentralization of military power that had occurred during the Taiping Rebellion, when the Qing court had been forced to rely on regionally raised armies commanded by Chinese scholar-officials. Yuan Shikai's Beiyang Army (北洋军, Beiyangjun) — the most powerful military force in the country — was itself a collection of personal networks and patron-client relationships rather than a unified national institution, and upon Yuan's death it fragmented into competing factions. The most important were the Zhili clique (直系, Zhixi), the Anhui clique (皖系, Wanxi), and the Fengtian clique (奉系, Fengxi) — each named after the home province or base of its leading figure and each controlling different regions of northern China.

The warlord era was not simply a period of anarchy. Many warlords attempted to govern their territories with some degree of order and even reform. Yan Xishan (阎锡山, 1883–1960) in Shanxi promoted education, road-building, and economic development. Feng Yuxiang (冯玉祥, 1882–1948), the "Christian General," was known for his populist policies and his soldiers' discipline. Zhang Zuolin (张作霖, 1875–1928), the former Manchurian bandit who became the warlord of the northeast, promoted industrial development in Manchuria. But these were exceptions. Most warlords were predatory rulers who exploited their territories ruthlessly, imposed crushing taxation, conscripted young men into their armies, and left their populations impoverished and brutalized.

The human cost of the warlord era was staggering. Conservative estimates suggest that warlord wars killed hundreds of thousands of soldiers and civilians between 1916 and 1928, with millions more displaced or impoverished. The wars disrupted agriculture, destroyed infrastructure, and prevented the development of a national economy. Perhaps most importantly, the warlord era discredited the Republic itself — the parliamentary institutions, the constitution, the democratic process — which came to be seen as empty facades behind which military strongmen pursued their naked ambitions. This disillusionment with liberal democracy would have lasting consequences for Chinese political culture.

Despite the political chaos, a nominal central government continued to exist in Beijing, claiming to represent the Republic of China and maintaining diplomatic relations with foreign powers. But this government was a plaything of whichever warlord faction happened to control the capital at any given time. Between 1916 and 1928, Beijing saw a bewildering succession of presidents, premiers, and cabinets — many lasting only weeks or months — as different warlord factions competed for control. The Beijing government's sole significant function was its recognition by foreign powers, which gave it control over customs revenues and access to foreign loans — resources that made control of Beijing a prize worth fighting for, even as the government itself had virtually no power over the rest of the country.

4. The New Culture Movement and the Intellectual Revolution

While China's political life descended into warlordism, its intellectual life underwent a revolution of unprecedented scope and intensity. The New Culture Movement (新文化运动, Xin Wenhua Yundong), which emerged around 1915–1917 and reached its climax with the May Fourth Movement of 1919, represented the most radical reassessment of Chinese civilization in history — a comprehensive critique of Confucian tradition and a passionate embrace of science, democracy, and modernity that transformed Chinese thought, literature, education, and social values.

The movement's intellectual center was Peking University (北京大学, Beijing Daxue, commonly known as Beida 北大), where the reformist chancellor Cai Yuanpei (蔡元培, 1868–1940) had assembled a brilliant faculty that included some of the most original minds of the era. Its principal organ was the journal New Youth (新青年, Xin Qingnian), founded in 1915 by Chen Duxiu (陈独秀, 1879–1942), which became the most influential publication in modern Chinese intellectual history. Chen's editorials called for a total break with Confucian tradition — which he identified as the root cause of China's weakness — and the wholehearted embrace of "Mr. Science" (赛先生, Sai Xiansheng) and "Mr. Democracy" (德先生, De Xiansheng) as the guiding principles of Chinese modernity.

The most transformative achievement of the New Culture Movement was the literary revolution — the replacement of classical Chinese (文言文, wenyanwen) with the vernacular language (白话文, baihuawen) as the medium of serious writing. The campaign was launched by Hu Shi (胡适, 1891–1962), a Columbia University-trained philosopher, in a 1917 article in New Youth entitled "A Modest Proposal for the Reform of Literature" (文学改良刍议, Wenxue Gailiang Chuyi). Hu argued that classical Chinese — a literary language as remote from spoken Chinese as Latin was from modern Italian — was an elitist barrier to mass education and cultural development, and that only writing in the living, spoken language could create a literature that was vital, democratic, and capable of engaging with the modern world. The literary revolution succeeded with astonishing rapidity: by 1920, the Ministry of Education had mandated the use of vernacular Chinese in all primary school textbooks, and within a decade, virtually all serious Chinese writing — fiction, poetry, essays, journalism, scholarship — had shifted to the vernacular.

The New Culture Movement also produced a flowering of modern Chinese literature. Lu Xun (鲁迅, 1881–1936), widely regarded as the greatest modern Chinese writer, published his devastating short story "A Madman's Diary" (狂人日记, Kuangren Riji) in New Youth in 1918 — the first modern short story written in vernacular Chinese. The story, an allegorical attack on Confucian society as a system of cannibalism, announced the arrival of a new literary sensibility that was psychologically penetrating, politically engaged, and formally innovative. Lu Xun's subsequent works — particularly The True Story of Ah Q (阿Q正传, A Q Zhengzhuan) and the short story collection Call to Arms (呐喊, Nahan) — established the model for modern Chinese fiction and made Lu Xun a cultural icon whose influence persists to the present day.

Beyond literature, the New Culture Movement challenged virtually every aspect of traditional Chinese society. Reformers attacked the patriarchal family system, advocated women's emancipation and free-choice marriage, criticized arranged marriages and footbinding (which was finally declining), promoted physical education and public health, called for the reform of the Chinese writing system, and debated the relative merits of anarchism, socialism, liberalism, and pragmatism as models for China's future. The movement was not monolithic — its participants disagreed fiercely on almost everything except the need for radical change — but its collective impact was transformative. It created the intellectual foundations for modern Chinese culture and politics, and its key debates — about tradition and modernity, democracy and authoritarianism, individual freedom and collective welfare — remain central to Chinese intellectual life today.

5. The May Fourth Movement (1919)

The intellectual revolution of the New Culture Movement was catalyzed into a mass political movement by the events of May 4, 1919. At the Paris Peace Conference that followed World War I, China's representatives discovered that the victorious Allied powers had secretly agreed to transfer Germany's territorial concessions in Shandong province — including the strategically important port of Qingdao (青岛) — not to China but to Japan, which had seized them during the war. This decision, made despite China's participation in the war on the Allied side (China had sent 140,000 laborers to support the Allied war effort in France), was a devastating betrayal that exposed the hollowness of Woodrow Wilson's rhetoric about national self-determination and the rights of small nations.

When news of the Shandong decision reached China, it provoked an explosion of outrage. On May 4, 1919, over 3,000 students from Peking University and other Beijing institutions marched to Tiananmen (天安门) and the foreign legation quarter, carrying banners denouncing the "Twenty-One Demands" (二十一条, Ershiyi Tiao) that Japan had imposed on China in 1915 and demanding that the Chinese delegation at Paris refuse to sign the treaty. The demonstration turned violent when students attacked the residence of Cao Rulin (曹汝霖), the pro-Japanese foreign minister, and beat Zhang Zongxiang (章宗祥), the Chinese minister to Japan, who was present at Cao's house. The Beijing government arrested dozens of students, but the arrests only inflamed public opinion further.

The student protests rapidly expanded into a nationwide movement of strikes, boycotts, and demonstrations. Workers in Shanghai launched a general strike that shut down the city's factories, shops, and transport systems. Merchants organized boycotts of Japanese goods. Students in cities across China organized protest marches, founded patriotic associations, and published newspapers and pamphlets. The May Fourth Movement — as it came to be known — was the first modern mass political movement in Chinese history, uniting students, workers, merchants, and intellectuals in a common cause and demonstrating the political potential of popular mobilization.

The immediate political impact of the May Fourth Movement was limited — the Beijing government released the arrested students and dismissed the pro-Japanese officials, and the Chinese delegation at Paris refused to sign the Treaty of Versailles, but the Shandong concessions remained in Japanese hands until 1922. The movement's lasting significance, however, was profound. It radicalized a generation of Chinese intellectuals and students, pushing many of them toward more radical political positions — particularly Marxism and Leninism, which offered both an explanation for China's humiliation (imperialism as the product of capitalism) and a program for national liberation (revolution led by a disciplined vanguard party). The May Fourth Movement thus created the political and intellectual conditions for the founding of the Chinese Communist Party two years later.

6. The Founding of the Chinese Communist Party (1921)

The May Fourth Movement's turn toward radicalism coincided with the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, which had a galvanizing effect on Chinese intellectuals. The Russian Revolution demonstrated that a backward, predominantly agrarian country could overthrow its ruling class, defeat foreign intervention, and begin to build a new society based on socialist principles — a model that seemed directly relevant to China's situation. Lenin's theory of imperialism — which explained the exploitation of colonial and semi-colonial countries as a structural feature of global capitalism — provided Chinese intellectuals with a powerful analytical framework for understanding their country's subordination to the Western powers and Japan.

The key figure in the reception of Marxism in China was Li Dazhao (李大钊, 1889–1927), the chief librarian at Peking University and one of the most respected intellectuals in the country. Li's articles in New Youth in 1918 and 1919, celebrating the Bolshevik Revolution as "the victory of Bolshevism" and "the new era of the world revolution," introduced Marxist-Leninist ideas to a wide audience and inspired the formation of Marxist study groups at universities across China. Chen Duxiu, the founder of New Youth, also embraced Marxism after the May Fourth Movement, and the two men became the principal founders of the Chinese Communist movement.

The Chinese Communist Party (中国共产党, Zhongguo Gongchandang, CCP) was formally established at its First National Congress, held in Shanghai from July 23 to August 2, 1921. The congress was attended by thirteen delegates representing approximately fifty-seven members from Marxist groups in Shanghai, Beijing, Changsha, Wuhan, Jinan, Guangzhou, and Tokyo. Among the delegates was a twenty-seven-year-old assistant librarian from Hunan named Mao Zedong (毛泽东, 1893–1976), who represented the Changsha group. The congress, which was organized with the assistance of Comintern (Communist International) representatives, adopted a Marxist-Leninist program calling for the overthrow of capitalism, the establishment of a dictatorship of the proletariat, and the abolition of private property.

The early CCP was a tiny, predominantly intellectual organization with virtually no mass base. Its transformation into a significant political force was made possible by the Comintern's strategic decision to promote a "united front" (统一战线, tongyi zhanxian) between the CCP and Sun Yat-sen's Guomindang — a decision driven by the Soviet Union's geopolitical interest in creating a friendly government in China that could serve as a counterweight to the Western powers and Japan.

7. Sun Yat-sen, Soviet Aid, and the First United Front

Sun Yat-sen had spent the years since the failure of the Second Revolution in 1913 attempting to build a base from which to reunify China and establish a genuine republic. Operating from Guangzhou (Canton), where he depended on the unreliable support of local warlords, Sun had experienced repeated frustrations and failures. By the early 1920s, he had concluded that the Western democracies were uninterested in helping China — they were content to maintain the unequal treaty system and to deal with whatever government controlled Beijing — and that only the Soviet Union offered the assistance China needed.

The Soviet Union, for its part, was eager to cultivate Sun Yat-sen as an ally. In 1923, Sun and the Soviet diplomat Adolph Joffe issued a joint declaration establishing the basis for Sino-Soviet cooperation. The Soviet Union agreed to provide the Guomindang with military advisors, weapons, and financial support; in return, Sun agreed to reorganize the Guomindang along Leninist lines — as a tightly disciplined, hierarchically organized "vanguard party" — and to admit individual CCP members into the Guomindang while maintaining the CCP as a separate organization. This arrangement — the First United Front (第一次国共合作, Di-yi ci Guogong Hezuo) — was formally established in January 1924 at the First National Congress of the reorganized Guomindang.

The Soviet Union sent its most capable operative, Mikhail Borodin (鲍罗廷, Baoluoting), to serve as Sun's chief political advisor. Borodin reorganized the Guomindang into a disciplined party with a clear hierarchy, a system of party cells, and a propaganda apparatus modeled on the Soviet Communist Party. The Soviets also established the Whampoa Military Academy (黄埔军校, Huangpu Junxiao) near Guangzhou in 1924, which trained a new generation of politically committed military officers for the revolutionary army. The academy's commandant was Chiang Kai-shek (蒋介石, Jiang Jieshi, 1887–1975), a military officer who had studied in Japan and the Soviet Union and who would emerge as the dominant figure in Chinese politics for the next quarter-century. The political director of the academy was Zhou Enlai (周恩来, 1898–1976), a CCP member who would become one of the most important leaders of the Communist movement.

Sun Yat-sen died of cancer on March 12, 1925, leaving behind a political legacy of enormous importance but also deep ambiguity. His Three Principles of the People provided the ideological framework for the Guomindang, but they were sufficiently vague to be interpreted in radically different ways by the party's left and right wings. His acceptance of Soviet aid and CCP cooperation was a tactical masterstroke that gave the Guomindang the organizational and military capabilities it needed, but it also planted the seeds of a devastating split between Nationalists and Communists that would come to fruition within two years of his death.

8. The May Thirtieth Movement and Rising Nationalism

The political radicalization that the May Fourth Movement had begun was accelerated by the May Thirtieth Incident (五卅运动, Wu-Sa Yundong) of 1925. On May 30, police in the International Settlement of Shanghai — commanded by a British officer — opened fire on Chinese demonstrators protesting the killing of a Chinese worker by a Japanese foreman at a Japanese-owned cotton mill, killing thirteen people. The shootings provoked an eruption of anti-imperialist fury that dwarfed even the May Fourth Movement.

A general strike in Shanghai, involving over 200,000 workers, shut down the city for weeks. In Guangzhou, a massive demonstration on June 23 was fired upon by British and French troops on Shamian Island (沙面, Shamian), killing over fifty demonstrators and triggering a sixteen-month boycott of British goods and a strike by Chinese workers in Hong Kong that paralyzed the colony's economy. The wave of strikes, boycotts, and demonstrations spread to cities across China, and anti-imperialist sentiment — already intense — reached a fever pitch.

The May Thirtieth Movement was a turning point for both the Guomindang and the CCP. The Guomindang's membership surged as patriotic Chinese flocked to the only political party that seemed capable of standing up to the imperialist powers. The CCP, which had played a leading role in organizing the strikes and demonstrations, also grew dramatically — from fewer than 1,000 members in early 1925 to nearly 58,000 by April 1927. More broadly, the movement demonstrated the political power of organized labor and urban mass mobilization, and it convinced both Nationalists and Communists that the anti-imperialist struggle and the social revolution were inseparable.

9. The Northern Expedition and the Shanghai Massacre (1926–1927)

On July 9, 1926, the National Revolutionary Army (国民革命军, Guomin Geming Jun) — the Guomindang's new military force, trained and equipped with Soviet assistance — launched the Northern Expedition (北伐, Beifa), a military campaign to reunify China by defeating the warlords and establishing a national government. The expedition was commanded by Chiang Kai-shek, who had consolidated his control over the Guomindang's military apparatus following Sun Yat-sen's death.

The Northern Expedition was one of the most successful military campaigns in modern Chinese history. The revolutionary army, combining military force with political mobilization — CCP organizers went ahead of the advancing troops, organizing workers' unions, peasant associations, and propaganda campaigns that undermined warlord support — swept through Hunan, Hubei, Jiangxi, and Fujian in a matter of months. By the end of 1926, the expedition had reached the Yangtze valley, and Wuhan (武汉) had been captured. By early 1927, the revolutionary forces controlled most of southern and central China.

But as the expedition advanced, tensions between the Guomindang's right wing (led by Chiang Kai-shek) and its left wing (which included the CCP and sympathizers) escalated into a fundamental conflict over the direction of the revolution. The CCP and the Guomindang left, based in Wuhan, favored a continuation of the social revolution — land reform, workers' rights, anti-imperialism — alongside the military campaign. Chiang Kai-shek, who had increasingly aligned himself with conservative business interests, landlords, and secret society leaders in the prosperous Yangtze Delta region, viewed the CCP's social radicalism as a threat to the social order and to his own power.

The crisis came to a head in Shanghai. In March 1927, CCP-led workers staged a general strike and armed uprising that seized control of much of the city before the arrival of Chiang's troops. On April 12, 1927, Chiang launched a devastating purge — the "April 12 Incident" (四一二事件, Si-Yi-Er Shijian), known to Communists as the "April 12 Counter-Revolutionary Coup" (四一二反革命政变). Using troops and members of the Green Gang (青帮, Qingbang), a powerful Shanghai criminal organization, Chiang's forces attacked Communist-controlled labor unions, arrested and executed CCP members and suspected sympathizers, and crushed the workers' movement in a campaign of white terror that killed thousands. Similar purges followed in Guangzhou, Changsha, and other cities.

The Shanghai Massacre of April 12, 1927, was a decisive turning point in modern Chinese history. It destroyed the First United Front, decimated the CCP's urban organization, and drove the surviving Communists underground or into the countryside. The Wuhan government, led by Wang Jingwei (汪精卫, 1883–1944), initially condemned Chiang's actions but soon carried out its own purge of Communists in July 1927. The Soviet advisors were expelled, and the CCP — which had been a rapidly growing urban party with nearly 60,000 members — was reduced to a hunted remnant.

For the CCP, the catastrophe of 1927 necessitated a fundamental strategic reorientation. Having been nearly destroyed in the cities, the surviving Communist leaders — most importantly Mao Zedong — would turn to the countryside, to the peasantry, and to guerrilla warfare as the basis for a revolutionary strategy that would ultimately prove successful, though the path from the ashes of Shanghai to the victory of 1949 would take over two decades of struggle, sacrifice, and reinvention.

10. Conclusion: The Unfinished Revolution

By 1928, when Chiang Kai-shek's forces captured Beijing (renamed Beiping, 北平, "Northern Peace") and nominally reunified China under the Nationalist government at Nanjing, the early Republic era had produced a paradoxical legacy. On the one hand, the period had been a catastrophe of political fragmentation, military violence, and foreign exploitation. Parliamentary democracy had been tried and had failed. The warlords had devastated the country. The promise of the 1911 Revolution — a unified, democratic, modern China — remained unfulfilled.

On the other hand, the period had been one of the most creative and consequential in Chinese history. The New Culture Movement had transformed Chinese intellectual life, replacing classical Chinese with the vernacular, introducing modern literary forms, and initiating a searching critique of Chinese tradition that would shape Chinese culture for generations. The May Fourth Movement had created modern Chinese nationalism as a mass political force. The founding of the CCP had introduced Marxism-Leninism as a major ideological force in Chinese politics. The reorganization of the Guomindang had created the first modern Chinese political party. And the Northern Expedition had demonstrated that military force, combined with political mobilization and a coherent ideology, could reunify the country.

The fundamental question that the early Republic had raised but not answered was whether China's future lay with the Nationalists or the Communists — with Chiang Kai-shek's vision of a centralized, authoritarian state led by a modernizing elite, or with Mao Zedong's vision of a revolutionary transformation led by the peasant masses. The next two decades — the Nanjing Decade, the war against Japan, and the civil war — would provide the answer, though at a cost that no one in 1928 could have foreseen.