History of Chinese Culture/Chapter 10

Previous◀ Chapter 9

History of Chinese Culture

NextChapter 11 ▶

Chapter 10: Qing Dynasty Culture I — The Manchu-Chinese Synthesis (1644–ca. 1800)

1. Introduction: Conquest and Cultural Negotiation

The Manchu conquest of China in 1644 inaugurated the last — and, in many respects, the most culturally productive — dynasty in Chinese imperial history. The Qing dynasty (1644–1912), founded by the Manchu Aisin Gioro clan from the forests and plains of Manchuria (modern northeastern China), faced a cultural challenge of extraordinary complexity: how could a non-Chinese people, whose own traditions of nomadic warfare, shamanism, and tribal confederation were radically different from those of Chinese civilization, establish legitimate rule over the world's most culturally self-confident society?

The answer the Qing rulers devised was a masterful strategy of dual identity — a simultaneous presentation of themselves as Manchu warrior-rulers and Chinese sage-emperors, maintaining the distinctive cultural practices of the Manchu elite (the Manchu language, martial skills, hunting, bannerman identity) while embracing, patronizing, and in many respects surpassing the cultural achievements of the Chinese classical tradition. This strategy of cultural synthesis — not the suppression of Chinese culture, but its appropriation, patronage, and redirection — enabled the Qing to rule China for 268 years and to preside over a period of cultural achievement that, in its scope and quality, bears comparison with any period in Chinese history.

The Qing dynasty's cultural achievement was concentrated above all in the reigns of three extraordinary rulers: the Kangxi Emperor (康熙, r. 1661–1722), the Yongzheng Emperor (雍正, r. 1722–1735), and the Qianlong Emperor (乾隆, r. 1735–1796) — a period of 135 years that is sometimes called the "High Qing" and that witnessed an unprecedented combination of imperial patronage, scholarly enterprise, artistic production, and territorial expansion. This chapter examines the culture of the High Qing under ten headings: the Manchu-Chinese identity; the court culture of the great emperors; the Siku quanshu and other scholarly projects; painting and calligraphy; Peking opera; bannerman culture; porcelain and global trade; Tibetan Buddhism at court; the literary inquisition; and the Qing cultural legacy.

2. The Manchu-Chinese Identity

The cultural identity of the Qing ruling elite was defined by a deliberate and carefully managed duality. The Manchus were acutely conscious that the Mongol Yuan dynasty had failed — had lasted less than a century — in part because the Mongol rulers had never fully engaged with Chinese culture and had never secured the loyalty of the Chinese literati. The Qing rulers were determined to avoid this mistake, and from the very beginning of their rule, they pursued a policy of demonstrating their mastery of Chinese culture while simultaneously maintaining the distinctive identity of the Manchu elite.

The most visible symbol of Manchu identity — and the one that most deeply affected the daily life of the Chinese population — was the requirement that Chinese men adopt the Manchu hairstyle: shaving the front of the head and wearing the remaining hair in a long braid (辫子, bianzi, known in English as the "queue"). This requirement, enforced under penalty of death, was bitterly resented by the Chinese as a humiliation and a desecration of the Confucian principle that one's body, received from one's parents, should not be damaged. The queue became the most potent symbol of Manchu domination and would remain a focus of anti-Manchu sentiment until the fall of the dynasty in 1912.

Yet the Manchu rulers also made extraordinary efforts to present themselves as exemplary Chinese rulers. They mastered the Chinese classical language, wrote poetry in Chinese (the Kangxi and Qianlong emperors were both prolific poets), practiced Chinese calligraphy, patronized Chinese painting, supported the Confucian examination system, honored Confucius with elaborate rituals, and commissioned vast scholarly projects that celebrated and preserved the Chinese literary heritage. The Kangxi Emperor personally conducted a famous series of lectures on the Confucian classics, demonstrating his mastery of the texts and his commitment to the ideals they embodied. The Qianlong Emperor, who styled himself a universal ruler presiding over a multicultural empire, presented himself simultaneously as a Confucian sage-king, a Buddhist bodhisattva, a Tibetan chakravartin, and a Manchu warrior-chief — a performance of multiple identities that was intended to legitimate his authority over the diverse peoples of the Qing Empire.

The Manchu rulers also maintained institutions and practices designed to preserve Manchu ethnic identity and prevent the complete absorption of the Manchu elite into Chinese culture. The "Eight Banners" (八旗, baqi) system — the military-administrative organization that structured Manchu (and allied Mongol and Chinese) society — remained the institutional framework of Manchu identity throughout the dynasty. Bannermen were garrisoned in designated quarters of major cities, forbidden to marry Chinese commoners (at least officially), required to maintain proficiency in Manchu language and martial skills, and provided with hereditary stipends that freed them from the necessity of manual labor. The Manchu homeland of Manchuria was declared off-limits to Chinese settlement — a policy that was increasingly violated in practice but that reflected the Qing rulers' determination to maintain a Manchu territorial and cultural base.

3. The Court Culture of the Great Emperors

The reigns of the Kangxi, Yongzheng, and Qianlong emperors constituted a golden age of Chinese court culture — a period in which the resources of the world's wealthiest and most powerful state were deployed in support of cultural enterprises of unparalleled scope and ambition.

The Kangxi Emperor (1654–1722), who ascended the throne at the age of seven and ruled for sixty-one years — the longest reign in Chinese history — was a man of extraordinary intellectual curiosity and cultural breadth. He studied Western mathematics and astronomy with the Jesuit missionaries at his court (particularly the Flemish Jesuit Ferdinand Verbiest, 1623–1688), commissioned a comprehensive atlas of the Qing Empire using Western cartographic techniques, sponsored the compilation of the Kangxi zidian (康熙字典, Kangxi Dictionary, 1716) — the most comprehensive Chinese dictionary up to that time, containing 47,035 characters — and patronized the production of some of the finest porcelain, enamelware, and lacquerwork in Chinese history.

The Yongzheng Emperor (1678–1735), who ruled for only thirteen years but governed with exceptional energy and efficiency, was a patron of the arts and a practitioner of both Confucian and Buddhist meditation. His personal involvement in the design and production of imperial porcelain — he sent detailed instructions to the Jingdezhen kilns specifying colors, patterns, and quality standards — resulted in wares of extraordinary refinement and technical perfection.

The Qianlong Emperor (1711–1799), who ruled for sixty years before voluntarily abdicating in 1796 (so as not to exceed his grandfather Kangxi's reign in length), was the most culturally ambitious ruler in Chinese history. He was a prolific poet (he composed more than 43,000 poems, the largest poetic output attributed to any individual in world literature), an avid calligrapher, a passionate collector of art and antiquities (his personal collection included thousands of paintings, calligraphies, bronzes, jades, porcelains, and rare books), and a patron of scholarly, artistic, and architectural projects on a scale that dwarfed the efforts of any previous ruler. His commissions included the expansion of the Forbidden City, the construction of the Old Summer Palace (圆明园, Yuanmingyuan) — a vast complex of palaces, gardens, and waterworks that combined Chinese and European architectural styles and was described by contemporaries as the most beautiful garden in the world — and the encyclopedic Siku quanshu project described below.

The cultural impact of the great emperors' patronage extended beyond the court. The standards of taste, the aesthetic preferences, and the cultural values promoted by the court — in painting, calligraphy, ceramics, architecture, garden design, and literary composition — shaped the cultural life of the entire empire. The court was the ultimate arbiter of cultural excellence, and the imperial collections — which were systematically catalogued, inscribed with imperial seals and colophons, and stored in the palaces and libraries of the Forbidden City — constituted the most comprehensive repository of Chinese cultural heritage in existence.

4. The Siku Quanshu and Scholarly Enterprises

The most ambitious scholarly enterprise of the Qing dynasty — and one of the most ambitious in world history — was the compilation of the Siku quanshu (四库全书, "Complete Collection of the Four Treasuries"), a comprehensive anthology of Chinese literature ordered by the Qianlong Emperor in 1772 and completed in 1782. The project, which employed more than 3,800 scholars and copyists over a period of ten years, collected, edited, and transcribed 3,461 titles comprising approximately 79,000 volumes — making it the largest collection of books ever assembled up to that time and one of the most comprehensive repositories of Chinese cultural knowledge in existence.

The Siku quanshu was organized according to the traditional four-fold classification of Chinese literature: jing (经, Classics), shi (史, History), zi (子, Philosophy), and ji (集, Belles-lettres) — the "Four Treasuries" of the title. The collection encompassed the full range of Chinese intellectual achievement — Confucian philosophy, Buddhist and Daoist texts, histories, geographies, scientific and medical treatises, literary criticism, poetry, fiction, and encyclopedias — and its compilation required the systematic survey of the literary holdings of the entire empire. Seven manuscript copies of the complete collection were made and housed in specially constructed libraries throughout the empire.

The Siku quanshu was, however, a double-edged cultural enterprise. While it preserved and made accessible an enormous body of Chinese literature, it also served as an instrument of censorship. The compilation process involved the systematic review of the entire body of Chinese literature, and works deemed offensive to the Manchu rulers — particularly works that contained anti-Manchu sentiment, derogatory references to the northern "barbarian" peoples, or material considered politically subversive — were destroyed, expurgated, or suppressed. The number of works destroyed during the Siku compilation has been estimated at approximately 2,600 titles — a staggering act of cultural destruction that was the dark side of the Qianlong Emperor's cultural patronage.

Other major scholarly enterprises of the Qing included the Kangxi zidian (mentioned above); the Gujin tushu jicheng (古今图书集成, "Complete Collection of Illustrations and Writings from the Earliest to Current Times," 1725), a massive encyclopedia of 10,000 volumes that was the largest encyclopedia in the world until the creation of Wikipedia; and a series of imperially sponsored editions of the Confucian classics, Buddhist scriptures, and Manchu-language texts that reflected the Qing rulers' commitment to both Chinese and Manchu cultural traditions.

5. Qing Painting and Calligraphy

Qing dynasty painting was characterized by a remarkable diversity of styles and approaches — from the faithful continuation of the Ming literati tradition to the bold experimentation of the "Individualist" masters to the meticulous realism of court painting influenced by Western techniques.

The most celebrated painters of the early Qing were the so-called "Four Monks" (四僧, Si seng): Hongren (弘仁, 1610–1664), Kuncan (髡残, 1612–1673), Shitao (石涛, 1642–1707), and Bada Shanren (八大山人, 1626–1705) — all of whom had taken Buddhist vows (hence their collective designation) and all of whom were descended from the fallen Ming imperial house or its supporters. Their art — intensely personal, emotionally charged, and technically innovative — expressed the anguish of the Ming-Qing transition and the determination to preserve individual creative freedom in the face of political catastrophe.

Bada Shanren, a member of the Ming imperial clan who spent decades living as a Buddhist and Daoist monk, created paintings of astonishing originality and emotional power — particularly his images of birds, fish, and flowers, rendered in bold, minimal brushstrokes, with expressions that seem to convey the painter's own feelings of bewilderment, defiance, and sardonic humor in the face of a world turned upside down. Shitao, equally innovative, developed a philosophy of painting that emphasized the primacy of individual creative vision over the authority of tradition: "The method of no-method is the supreme method," he wrote in his theoretical treatise Hua yulu (画语录, "Remarks on Painting") — a statement that anticipated the artistic individualism of the modern era.

The court painters of the Qing, by contrast, worked in a realistic style that was increasingly influenced by Western techniques. The Italian Jesuit painter Giuseppe Castiglione (郎世宁, Lang Shining, 1688–1766), who served at the court of the Kangxi, Yongzheng, and Qianlong emperors for over fifty years, developed a unique hybrid style that combined European techniques of perspective, shading, and anatomical accuracy with Chinese compositional principles and painting materials. His paintings — which included portraits of the emperor and his consorts, hunting scenes, horse paintings, and botanical illustrations — represent one of the most successful examples of cross-cultural artistic synthesis in world history.

The Orthodox School (正统派, Zhengtong pai), represented by the "Four Wangs" — Wang Shimin (王时敏, 1592–1680), Wang Jian (王鉴, 1598–1677), Wang Hui (王翚, 1632–1717), and Wang Yuanqi (王原祁, 1642–1715) — pursued a more conservative approach, creating landscape paintings that consciously emulated the styles of the Yuan and Song masters. Their art, which enjoyed imperial patronage and dominated the official painting establishment, represented the culmination of the literati painting tradition that had been developing since the Yuan dynasty.

6. Peking Opera

Peking opera (京剧, Jingju), which would become the most internationally recognized form of Chinese theater, had its origins in the Qing dynasty. The art form emerged from the fusion of several regional operatic traditions — particularly the Anhui opera (徽剧, Huiju) and the Hubei opera (汉剧, Hanju) — that were brought to Beijing by touring theatrical troupes in the late eighteenth century. The conventional date for the "birth" of Peking opera is 1790, when four Anhui opera troupes were invited to Beijing to perform at the eightieth birthday celebration of the Qianlong Emperor.

The theatrical traditions that came together in Peking opera were themselves the product of centuries of development, drawing on the Yuan zaju tradition, the Ming chuanqi (传奇, "marvel tales") dramatic tradition, the regional operatic traditions of southern and central China, and the performance traditions of storytelling, acrobatics, martial arts, and popular entertainment. The synthesis of these diverse elements into a unified art form was a gradual process that continued throughout the nineteenth century and reached its mature form only in the late Qing and early Republican period.

Peking opera is a total theater that integrates singing, recitation, acting, and acrobatic combat (唱念做打, chang nian zuo da) into a highly stylized performance that draws on a system of role types, stage conventions, musical modes, and gestural vocabularies that had been developed and refined over centuries. The four principal role types — sheng (生, male roles), dan (旦, female roles), jing (净, "painted face" roles), and chou (丑, comic roles) — each have their own vocal styles, movement vocabularies, and costume conventions, and the training required to master a single role type is extraordinarily rigorous, typically beginning in childhood and continuing for a decade or more.

The cultural significance of Peking opera extended far beyond the theater. It became a medium through which the stories, values, and moral exemplars of Chinese civilization were transmitted to a broad popular audience — including the illiterate majority of the population who had no access to the literary culture of the elite. The great characters of Chinese history and legend — Guan Yu (关羽), the paragon of loyalty; Zhuge Liang (诸葛亮), the embodiment of wisdom; Bao Zheng (包拯), the incorruptible judge — were made vivid and memorable by the performances of great actors, and the moral lessons embodied in the plays — the importance of loyalty, filial piety, righteousness, and integrity — were reinforced by the emotional power of the theatrical experience.

7. Bannerman Culture

The Eight Banners system created a distinctive Manchu elite culture that existed alongside — and in complex interaction with — the broader Chinese culture of the Qing Empire. Bannermen (旗人, qiren), who constituted a hereditary military and administrative class, lived in designated quarters (旗营, qiying) of major cities, received hereditary stipends from the government, and were expected to maintain their Manchu identity through the practice of the Manchu language, horsemanship, archery, and other martial skills.

The culture of the bannerman community was a distinctive blend of Manchu and Chinese elements. While bannermen were expected to maintain Manchu traditions, they were also deeply immersed in Chinese culture — particularly the culture of the Beijing elite, with its passion for opera, poetry, painting, calligraphy, cricket-fighting, bird-keeping, and the pursuit of leisure and refinement. The great Qing novel Honglou meng (红楼梦, Dream of the Red Chamber, also known as The Story of the Stone), written by the bannerman Cao Xueqin (曹雪芹, ca. 1715–1763), is a masterpiece that draws deeply on the culture of the bannerman aristocracy — its wealth, its refinement, its obsession with art and beauty, and its underlying awareness of impermanence and decline.

The bannerman quarters of Beijing developed a distinctive urban culture that combined Manchu and Chinese elements in creative ways. Bannerman cuisine — which incorporated Manchu traditions of meat preparation (particularly mutton and game), Chinese culinary techniques, and imperial court recipes — contributed to the development of the rich and varied food culture that makes Beijing one of the great culinary capitals of the world. The bannerman tradition of storytelling (评书, pingshu), martial arts practice, and the patronage of theater and music also left lasting marks on the cultural life of the capital.

8. Porcelain and Global Trade

The porcelain industry of the Qing dynasty constitutes one of the most remarkable chapters in the history of material culture — a story of artistic virtuosity, technological innovation, and global commerce that made Chinese ceramics the most widely distributed luxury commodity in the early modern world and that established aesthetic standards that continue to influence ceramic production today.

The Qing dynasty brought Chinese porcelain to its final peak of technical and artistic achievement. The imperial kilns at Jingdezhen, under the supervision of a series of talented directors — most notably Tang Ying (唐英, 1682–1756), who served as director for nearly thirty years during the Yongzheng and Qianlong reigns — produced wares of astonishing technical virtuosity, including new glaze colors (such as the delicate pink fenghong 粉红, achieved with gold chloride — the famille rose palette), new decorative techniques (such as falangcai 珐琅彩, painted enamel on porcelain), and imitations of other materials (jade, bronze, lacquer, wood, bamboo) so convincing that they can only be distinguished from the originals by touch.

The global trade in Qing porcelain was conducted on an enormous scale. The Dutch East India Company (VOC), the English East India Company, and other European trading companies imported millions of pieces of Chinese porcelain to Europe during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and Chinese porcelain became one of the most sought-after luxury goods in the European market. The demand was so great that Chinese manufacturers produced vast quantities of "export porcelain" (外销瓷, waixiaoci) decorated with designs specifically intended for the European market — including European coats of arms, biblical scenes, and copies of European prints — a remarkable example of cross-cultural commercial adaptation.

The cultural impact of Chinese porcelain on European material culture was transformative. Chinese porcelain changed European dining habits (replacing pewter and wooden tableware), influenced European interior design (porcelain collecting and display became a major aristocratic fashion), stimulated the development of European porcelain manufacturing, and contributed to the broader European fascination with Chinese culture that characterized the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Augustus the Strong of Saxony (1670–1733), who famously declared that he suffered from a maladie de porcelaine, amassed a collection of more than 35,000 pieces and established the Meissen porcelain factory specifically to replicate the Chinese product. The French, English, and Dutch followed suit, establishing factories at Sevres, Worcester, and Delft that produced wares inspired by — and often directly copying — Chinese models. The global circulation of Chinese porcelain was thus not merely a commercial phenomenon but a cultural one: it carried Chinese aesthetic sensibilities, decorative motifs, and artistic techniques to every corner of the globe, making Chinese porcelain one of the most powerful vehicles of cross-cultural artistic exchange in human history.

The domestic Chinese market for porcelain was equally significant. Porcelain was not merely a luxury for the elite but an essential material of daily life at every social level — from the finest imperial wares to the sturdy blue-and-white bowls and plates used by ordinary households. The Jingdezhen kilns produced porcelain in an astonishing range of qualities and prices, ensuring that the products of Chinese ceramic art were accessible to a broad segment of the population. The cultural significance of porcelain in Chinese domestic life extended to its role in religious practice (porcelain incense burners, ritual vessels, and devotional images were essential furnishings of temples and household shrines), in social ritual (tea sets, wine cups, and banquet ware were central to the ceremonies of hospitality and social interaction), and in aesthetic cultivation (the connoisseurship of fine porcelain was an essential accomplishment of the cultivated gentleman).

9. Tibetan Buddhism and the Literary Inquisition

Tibetan Buddhism (藏传佛教) played an important role in Qing court culture, continuing the pattern established during the Yuan dynasty. The Qing rulers, who controlled Tibet and Mongolia as well as China proper, used Tibetan Buddhism as a tool of imperial governance — patronizing Tibetan Buddhist institutions, building Tibetan-style temples, and presenting themselves as Buddhist universal monarchs (chakravartins) to their Tibetan and Mongolian subjects. The Qianlong Emperor was particularly devoted to Tibetan Buddhism: he studied Tibetan Buddhist texts, received initiations from Tibetan lamas, and commissioned the construction of Tibetan Buddhist temples in Beijing and at the imperial summer retreat in Chengde (承德).

The Qing court's patronage of Tibetan Buddhism had significant cultural consequences. Tibetan Buddhist art — particularly the tradition of thangka painting (唐卡, religious paintings on silk or cotton), Buddhist sculpture, and the iconographic traditions of Vajrayana Buddhism — was introduced to the Chinese cultural sphere on a large scale, and Tibetan artistic influences can be detected in Qing court art, architecture, and ritual practice. The Yonghegong (雍和宫, "Palace of Harmony"), originally the Yongzheng Emperor's princely residence and converted into a Tibetan Buddhist temple in 1744, remains one of the most important Tibetan Buddhist temples outside Tibet and a visible symbol of the Qing dynasty's multicultural religious policy.

The literary inquisition (文字狱, wenziyu, literally "prison of words") was the dark counterpart of the Qing dynasty's cultural patronage. Throughout the dynasty — but with particular intensity during the Kangxi, Yongzheng, and Qianlong reigns — the Qing government conducted systematic campaigns to identify and punish authors, publishers, and readers of texts deemed offensive to the Manchu rulers. The offenses that could trigger persecution ranged from explicit anti-Manchu sentiment to the inadvertent use of words or phrases that could be interpreted as disrespectful to the ruling dynasty — a paranoid hermeneutic that created an atmosphere of fear and self-censorship that permeated Chinese intellectual life.

The consequences of the literary inquisition for Chinese culture were severe. Scholars learned to avoid politically sensitive topics, particularly those related to the Ming-Qing transition, the Manchu conquest, and the relationship between Chinese and non-Chinese peoples. The resulting redirection of scholarly energy away from contemporary political and philosophical questions and toward the "safe" fields of textual criticism, philology, and antiquarian scholarship — what came to be known as kaozheng (考证, "evidential research") — produced impressive scholarly achievements but also contributed to the intellectual conservatism that would characterize late Qing culture.

10. The Novel and Literary Culture

The Qing dynasty produced what is widely regarded as the greatest work of Chinese fiction and one of the supreme achievements of world literature: Honglou meng (红楼梦, Dream of the Red Chamber, also known as The Story of the Stone), written by the bannerman Cao Xueqin (曹雪芹, ca. 1715–1763). This vast, intricate, and deeply moving novel — which tells the story of the decline of a great aristocratic family through the eyes of its sensitive, artistic young scion, Jia Baoyu (贾宝玉) — is at once a realistic portrait of the life of the Qing elite in all its beauty and corruption, a philosophical meditation on the nature of desire, attachment, and illusion, a love story of extraordinary emotional power, and a prophetic allegory of the decline of Chinese civilization itself.

Honglou meng was, along with the three great Ming novels — Sanguozhi yanyi, Shuihu zhuan, and Xiyou ji — and the satirical novel Rulin waishi (儒林外史, The Scholars, ca. 1750) by Wu Jingzi (吴敬梓, 1701–1754), part of a tradition of long prose fiction that constituted one of the most original and culturally significant literary achievements of the Qing dynasty. The novel Liaozhai zhiyi (聊斋志异, Strange Stories from a Chinese Studio, completed 1679) by Pu Songling (蒲松龄, 1640–1715), a collection of supernatural tales written in elegant classical Chinese, demonstrated that the classical language remained a vital medium of literary creativity even as the vernacular novel was reaching new heights of artistic achievement.

The literary culture of the High Qing also included a vast body of poetry, literary criticism, and scholarly prose. The kaozheng school of evidential scholarship, while primarily associated with philology and textual criticism, also produced works of considerable literary merit, and the poetic traditions of the Qing — which included both continuators of the classical traditions and innovative voices that pushed the boundaries of poetic expression — were rich and varied. The Qing literary scene was enlivened by lively debates about the nature of literature, the relationship between emotion and reason, the relative merits of ancient and modern styles, and the proper function of literary art — debates that anticipated many of the concerns of modern literary criticism.

11. Conclusion: The Qing Cultural Synthesis

The culture of the High Qing — the period from approximately 1660 to 1800 — represented the culmination of the Chinese imperial cultural tradition. The Manchu rulers, through a combination of military power, political skill, and cultural patronage, created a multicultural empire of unprecedented extent and a court culture of extraordinary refinement and sophistication. The scholarly enterprises of the Kangxi, Yongzheng, and Qianlong reigns — the dictionaries, encyclopedias, collected works, and catalogues — constituted the most comprehensive attempt in Chinese history to collect, organize, and preserve the cultural heritage of the civilization. The painting, calligraphy, ceramics, and decorative arts of the High Qing reached levels of technical virtuosity and aesthetic refinement that have never been surpassed.

Yet the Qing cultural synthesis also contained tensions and contradictions that would become increasingly apparent in the nineteenth century. The literary inquisition, while preserving political stability, stifled intellectual creativity and created a culture of caution and conformity. The maintenance of Manchu ethnic identity, while serving the political interests of the ruling elite, created a social division that would eventually undermine the dynasty's legitimacy. And the confident cultural self-sufficiency of the High Qing — the conviction that Chinese civilization had nothing to learn from the outside world — would prove dangerously inadequate when the empire confronted the military and technological power of the industrialized West in the nineteenth century.